Jump to content

Wikipedia:Office actions: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Reverted edits by COD Reviewer (talk) to last revision by CharlieEchoTango (HG)
Mazordude (talk | contribs)
Blanked the page
Line 1: Line 1:
{{dablink|"WP:OA" redirects here. You may be looking for [[Wikipedia:Online Ambassadors]].}}
{{procedural policy|WP:OFFICE|WP:OA|text=This page is also a [[Wikimedia Foundation|Wikimedia]] [[WP:PG|official policy]], established by [[Jimmy Wales]] and endorsed by the Foundation as necessary for the operation of the sites under its jurisdiction.}}
{{nutshell|Sometimes the Wikimedia Foundation has to delete, protect or blank a page without going through the normal site/community process(es). These edits are temporary measures to prevent legal trouble or personal harm and ''should not be undone'' by any user.}}
{{Policylist}}

'''Office actions''' are official changes made on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation, by members of its office. These are removals of questionable or illegal Wikimedia content following complaints. Office actions are performed so that the end result is a legally compliant article on the subject. Neither this policy nor actions taken under it override core policies, such as [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutrality]].

The most common complaints are [[defamation]], [[Privacy laws of the United States|privacy violations]] and [[copyright infringement]].

==Short explanation==
Because "official edits" may seem strange in the context of an openly editable encyclopedia, some common causes for confusion should be clarified:

* Office actions are extremely rare.
* Office actions only occur by formal complaint made off-wiki (e.g. postal mail, electronic mail, telephone, or personal meetings).
* Grievances must be grounded in the law or be violations of Wikimedia standards. Requests for preferential treatment or attempts at intimidation are not heeded.
* The vast majority of cases are: libel, unjustifiable invasion of personal privacy, and copyright infringement. Since these are all inappropriate on Wikimedia anyway, office actions are preventable: if you see such a violation on a wiki, correct it or delete it and there will be no cause for complaint and no need for an "office action".
** {{tl|blp}}, {{tl|db-attack}}, and {{tl|db-copyvio}} templates have been established for the correction of these problems and are useful for this.

== Process ==
Office actions will be clearly indicated both during and after to prevent ambiguities. Office actions may be authorized by any representative or delegate of the Wikimedia Foundation – such as its chair (currently [[User:Wing|Ting Chen]]), a member of the Foundation [[Foundation:Board of Trustees|Board of Trustees]], the Foundation's legal counsel, or a member of the [[Foundation:Current staff|Foundation office]].

When a page is modified under this policy, the template "{{[[Template:pp-office|pp-office]]}}" will be placed prominently on the page and the page will be [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|protected]]. An article may be reduced to a few sentences to remove questionable content, and people then invited to build it up to a more reputable state. This will be indicated by the template {{tl|reset}}. In either case, the instructions on the template should be followed by everyone.

Administrators, who have the technical power to undo protections and deletions, are strongly cautioned against modifying these edits. Official statements and past incidents indicate that such unauthorized modifications will be actively reverted, and possibly the [[Wikipedia:User access levels|rights]] of the modifier will be revoked. When in doubt, consult the user applying the protection/template, or the [[meta:Wikimedia Foundation|Wikimedia Foundation]].

== Who initiates office actions ==
# [[User:Zackexley|Zack Exley (Chief Community Officer)]], [[User:Philippe (WMF)|Philippe Beaudette (Head of Reader Relations)]], [[User:Christine (WMF)|Christine Moellenberndt (Community Associate)]], certain other senior staff members of the Wikimedia Foundation Office and the Wikimedia Foundation's legal counsel.
# Members of the [[foundation:Board of Trustees|Board of Trustees]], and particularly [[User:Jimbo Wales|Jimbo Wales]], co-founder of Wikipedia and founder of the Wikimedia Foundation.

== Currently under scrutiny ==
For images that have been deleted for copyright reasons, enter the name/description into a search engine to see what they looked like. If you see similar images bring them to the attention of the Office.
<!--{| class=wikitable
!Page name
!How to edit
!Date added
|-
| colspan="3" | There is currently nothing under office scrutiny.
|}-->
{| class=wikitable
!Page name
!How to edit
!Date added
|-
| [[Texas Instruments signing key controversy]]
| Article is available to edit except for inclusion of signing keys. If you'd like to appeal, please contact [[User:Philippe (WMF)]].
| 2009-10-07
|-
| [[Conventional PCI]]
| Article is available to edit except for inclusion of PCI Local Bus Specifications, as detailed on the article talk page. If you'd like to appeal, please contact [[User:Philippe (WMF)]].
| 2011-01-03
|-
| [[Choose Your Own Adventure]]
| Article is protected from editing. If you'd like to appeal, please contact [[User:Philippe (WMF)]].
| 2011-01-05
|}


For an automated, up-to-date list derived from {{tl|Pp-office}}, see [[:Category:Wikipedia Office-protected pages|Category:Wikipedia Office-protected pages]].

== Originalia ==

; [[User:Jimbo Wales|Jimbo's]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Office_actions&diff=prev&oldid=38516715 original comment], from 6 February 2006
: In particular,
:* "Please note that this is official policy, and reverting a WP:OFFICE may be grounds for blocking. I do not recommend that admins block for this, I'm just saying... don't revert a WP:OFFICE edit unless and until you've asked and know what you are doing. There may at times be legal reasons for this."
:* "This quick action is in no way meant to override or replace the process of community consensus. There is still plenty of time, and there are still plenty of places, for the community to discuss and replace articles in due course."

; Relevant mailing list discussions
* Jimbo's clarification {{cn}}
* [http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2006-March/041666.html I am Danny]
* [http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2006-March/041684.html Phone calls]
* [http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2006-March/041700.html Apology]
* [http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2006-April/044384.html Libel chill]
* (Relevant selections from these discussions are available at [[/Originalia]])

==DMCA compliance==
In some cases, the Foundation may be required to remove content from a Wikimedia Project due to a [[Digital Millennium Copyright Act|DMCA]] take-down notice. In order to retain safe harbor status, the Foundation is required to comply with validly formulated notices even if they are spurious. In the event that material is removed due to a DMCA notice, the only recourse for restoring such material is to file a counter-notice with the Foundation. If you believe that a take-down notice, which has been acted upon by the Foundation, is without legal basis, please visit the following sites to learn about filing a counter-notice:
*[http://www.citmedialaw.org/legal-guide/responding-dmca-takedown-notice-targeting-your-content "Responding to a DMCA Takedown Notice Targeting Your Content"] at Citizen Media Law Project
*[http://www.chillingeffects.org/question.cgi?QuestionID=132 Chilling Effects Clearinghouse FAQ]
*[http://www.chillingeffects.org/dmca/counter512.pdf Chilling Effects Clearinghouse counter-notice generator]
*[http://www.newmediarights.org/guide/legal/copyright/dmca/Sample_DMCA_CounterNotice_letter_when_claiming_fair_use_of_a_copyrighted_work newmediarights.org]

Please note that filing a counter-notice may lead to legal proceedings between you and the complaining party to determine ownership of the material. The DMCA process requires that you consent to the jurisdiction of a United States court. All notices should be sent to the Foundation's [[:wikimedia:Designated agent|designated agent]].

[[Category:Wikipedia administration|{{PAGENAME}}]]
[[Category:Wikipedia policy|{{PAGENAME}}]]
[[Category:Wikipedia procedural policy]]

[[de:Wikipedia:Office Action]]
[[no:Wikipedia:Kontor]]
[[simple:Wikipedia:Office actions]]
[[zh:Wikipedia:基金會行動]]

Revision as of 23:07, 3 March 2011