Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Golden stag beetle.jpg

Golden Stag Beetle[edit]

Reason: Sharp, well lit, good EV - all the attributes of an FP
Articles this image appears in: Stag beetle
Creator: Fir0002

Support as nominator --Fir0002 10:55, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support. I'm assuming the 'armour' of the beetle is iridescent and so the colour is hard to get accurate, but it does look a bit peculiar. Other than that though, good capture. You certainly have a backlog of images from summer '07! Diliff | (Talk) (Contribs) 12:39, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Yeah it was iridescent (as de Bivort mentioned below) which made getting the lighting right very challenging! And yes I do have a large backlog from 07 and I'm keeping busy this summer too ;-) --Fir0002 00:37, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support big honkin' beetle with fearsome maws and near-glowing backside. Good work again, Fir. Durova^Charge! 18:17, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Suport - lovely. Re: Diliff - yes, many scarabs have physical iridescence. de Bivort 18:36, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good details and lighting. Muhammad(talk) 21:00, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support DOF could have been more perfect, but the characteristic feature is very well captured. Papa Lima Whiskey (talk) 16:52, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support EV seems very good, although the lighting seems rather harsh. Fletcher (talk) 23:43, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support - DOF is good enough, lots of EV and I love how the lighting and iridescence work together; makes him look part Fabergé - Peripitus (Talk) 12:33, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Oppose The flash or lighting seems a bit strong to me. A302b (talk) 09:49, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support another fine shot! TAway (talk) 20:49, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support High quality and good EV. Makeemlighter (talk) 04:36, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Golden stag beetle.jpg --Wronkiew (talk) 06:32, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]