Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Francis II & I, Holy Roman Emperor.jpg

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Francis II & I, Holy Roman Emperor.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 2 Jan 2017 at 12:14:20 (UTC)

Original – Francis II & I, Holy Roman Emperor
Reason
illustrative and good quality
Articles in which this image appears
Francis II, Holy Roman Emperor
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Sculpture
Creator
Petar Milošević
  • Support as nominatorPetarM (talk) 12:14, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment – He was emperor of the decrepit HRE for eight years, abdicating after losing to Napoleon at Austerlitz. – Sca (talk) 15:43, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support lNeverCry 20:18, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment – I don't see EV in the nominated category, the article doesn't mention the sculpture. Bammesk (talk) 02:48, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Bammesk i try to get what are you asking for ? Which article should mention the sculpture ? --PetarM (talk) 08:58, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • @PetarM: The article you listed above. Nom's reason is: "illustrative and good quality", category is: "Artwork/Sculpture", so I look for content on the sculpture. If the nomination reason was: "Depiction of emperor in an article about the emperor", then the reason section should say so, and in that case I think there are better depictions in the article which show the emperor in full and in color. It is a good photo, but I don't see EV for FP. Bammesk (talk) 01:36, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Bammesk this is more question for forensics. But when i pass all those photos, i could not get his face more clearly than on this sculpture. Not just front but side too. Artist may tell you why sculpture/bust than painting. If you dont see reason, vote no. --PetarM (talk) 08:15, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • SupportJobas (talk) 00:30, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose – weak EV, good photo but there are better depictions of him [1], [2], [3], [4]. Bammesk (talk) 03:25, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support --LivioAndronico (talk) 18:56, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak oppose due to the EV issue. It is, however, an incredibly compelling photograph of an eye-catching sculpture. Josh Milburn (talk) 03:46, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust The Homunculus 15:31, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]