Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Seasons of Avatar: The Last Airbender
Seasons of Avatar: The Last Airbender
[edit]
This is a nomination on behalf of myself (User:NuclearWarfare), User:Haha169, User:Rau J, User:Parent5446, User:Pakaru and User:The Placebo Effect. I tried to get people who had worked on multiple articles, and I definitely got everyone from the season ones. User:Dylan0513, User:Fyre2387, and User:Wikialexdx were also involved on the main list, as were a whole host of others. I was unsure of how much depth to go into on this, so I'll just leave it at that.
Well, this is the entirety of the Avatar seasons that exists and is likely to ever exist, so I figure I might as well nominate this for a Featured Topic. The season articles are all are featured lists and the series finale is a GA, which seems to fit the Featured topic criteria. I was debating trying to get the actual Avatar: The Last Airbender, but the other TV series articles didn't have them, so I hope this is good enough. Also, because Sozin's Comet was merely the season finale, I'm unsure the title of this FTC needs changing. Please tell me what you think. NuclearWarfare (Talk) 20:00, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
Comment: Under the current scope of the topic, I think Sozin's Comet: The Final Battle should be removed from the topic since it is a series finale and not a season. Rreagan007 (talk) 20:23, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
- I'd really like to include Sozin's Comet, if possible. Is there a way to retitle this so that it is possible to include it? NuclearWarfare (Talk) 20:26, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
- The only way (in my opinion) you could get it in would be to expand the scope of the topic beyond just the seasons and make the topic "Avatar: The Last Airbender." You'd have to get Avatar: The Last Airbender and probably List of Avatar: The Last Airbender characters up to at least good article and featured list status respectively. You could always just remove the series finale for now and work toward an expanded topic later Rreagan007 (talk) 20:38, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
- As that was one of my long term goals anyway, I shall remove Sozin's Comet. NuclearWarfare (Talk) 20:47, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
- Oh well, at least the topi is fully featured now :) Dabomb87 (talk) 18:57, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- As that was one of my long term goals anyway, I shall remove Sozin's Comet. NuclearWarfare (Talk) 20:47, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
- The only way (in my opinion) you could get it in would be to expand the scope of the topic beyond just the seasons and make the topic "Avatar: The Last Airbender." You'd have to get Avatar: The Last Airbender and probably List of Avatar: The Last Airbender characters up to at least good article and featured list status respectively. You could always just remove the series finale for now and work toward an expanded topic later Rreagan007 (talk) 20:38, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
- Support now that the finale has been removed. Rreagan007 (talk) 20:48, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
- Support - well done - rst20xx (talk) 20:57, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
- Support - well done, since I also reviewed some of the FLC's of this topic :)Truco 23:20, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
- Support - Since Nuclear put me in as one of the nominators, I'm not sure if I can still support...but I'm still supporting, nonetheless. :) No criteria that says it shouldn't be there. --haha169 (talk) 00:14, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
- Support-Zginder 2009-01-10T00:56Z (UTC)
- Support –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 04:20, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
- Support - excellent work. TheLeftorium 23:46, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
- Support - per above. Gran2 11:46, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- Support Meets all criteria. Thanks for bearing with my nitpicks on the individual seasons' FLCs! Dabomb87 (talk) 18:57, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- Support because you desperately need my vote. –thedemonhog talk • edits 23:55, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- Strong oppose so that this does not have 100% consensus. Not NW (Talk) 00:12, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
- That was...interesting. Thanks for scaring me there, Nuclear. :) Too bad the history tab reveals everything. *sigh* I would've loved to debate an easy battle. --haha169 (talk) 05:12, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
Close with no consensus to promote - 10 supports to one oppose makes a majority, but not consensus- Close with consensus to promote - just kidding, sorry about the delay in promotion - rst20xx (talk) 22:37, 20 January 2009 (UTC)