Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/KeepOnRollin
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Wikipedia:Suspected sockpuppets/KeepOnRollin)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for deatiled instructions.
- Evidence
It is suspected that this user may be a sock puppet or impersonator of
Please refer to
- Special:Contributions/129.109.204.92,
- Special:Contributions/69.123.183.136,
- Special:Contributions/128.226.226.179 and
- Special:Contributions/71.38.150.18 for evidence.
The history of the article [REO Speedwagon] strongly suggests that User:KeepOnRollin has vandalized anonymously in order to repeatedly remove legitimate external and interwiki links. KeepOnRollin edits mirror previously cited edits originating from these IP addresses: [129.109.204.92], [69.123.183.136],[128.226.226.179], and [71.38.150.18] which have no other edits in their contribution histories. Despite repeated link deletion warnings over the same attempted edits, KeepOnRollin insists on violating Wikipedia policy. REO157 02:33, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments
- All of this IPs ceased to edit more than 2 weeks ago. Therefore, I'd say this case is outdated. --Dijxtra 13:19, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The dates exactly correspond to when [KeepOnRollin] appeared on the scene. REO157 13:38, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, quite, but my point is that the case of sockpuppetry you are submitting here happened more than 2 weeks ago and it seems to me that such cases shouldn't be considered... just my oppinion. I'll start a discussion on WP:SOCK and we'll see what the community has to say... See, this process of evaluating sockpuppetry cases is rather new (well, I started the project yesterday, in fact...) and it yet needs to be polished a bit. And I think it makes no sence to open cases such a long time after it happened... --Dijxtra 13:50, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I would just like to point out that the IP addresses in question trace back to several different places, most of which I've never even been to. I'd also like to point out that the reason for the delay in submission of this case is that REO157 ran out of other arguments (see the [REO Speedwagon talk page] and is now attempting to make me look bad in any way possible because I don't happen to support her agenda. --KeepOnRollin 10:22, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm closing this case without taking any action because the abuses in question happened more than one week ago. --Dijxtra 12:33, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]