Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tupolev TB-3

The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Demoted -MBK₀₀₄ 22:57, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tupolev TB-3

Reappraisal review: I am nominating this article for reappraisal because it may no longer meet the A-class criteria Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:44, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewers: Please say whether Milhist should Keep or Demote this article. Reviewers should satisfy themselves that the article fails on at least one A-class criterion before recommending Demote and should explain their reasons when commenting.

Agree; lacks references, contains MoS breaches, and is written rather choppily. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 01:41, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

'Remove due to referencing YellowMonkey (bananabucket) (help the Invincibles Featured topic drive) 20:24, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Remove - would only need a few more references, but the primary reference lacks page numbers, and the guy who wrote it, Emt147 (talk · contribs), hasn't edited in roughly a year. I notified him of this review; if he responds and plans to work on the page number issue, please change my !vote to "hold". Regards, —Ed (talk • contribs) 06:23, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Remove - I'm in the odd position where I have one book that mentions the Tupolev in a few sentences, giving its weight, speed and that it was the first all-metal bomber, and footnotes from that book that mention two other books in english that could be used as sources, but no way to access those sources. So, regretfully, I must vote to remove it as A-Class. Skinny87 (talk) 09:13, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.