Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/E-Century Publishing Corporation: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
←Created page with '"'''Keep''' My reasons: 1. Yes, this company was rather new by the common sense. However, the achievement of having 5 professional medical journals launched success...' |
←Blanked the page |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
"'''Keep''' My reasons: 1. Yes, this company was rather new by the common sense. However, the achievement of having 5 professional medical journals launched successfully, and 4 of them are indexed in PubMed and PubMed Centrals of multiple major countries (USA, UK and Canada) make it unique, and highly notable. 2. Yes, this company does not have extensive coverage from the conventional media. However, it is a company that is dedicated to the Open Access of Science (Knowledge), which is quite different from the most conventional business that is largely aimed at profit-generating. Therefore, this company may not have the enough fund to expose itself through the conventional media. However, the indexing by PubMed and full text archiving of its journals in PubMed Central that are being accessed by hundreds of thousands of scientists and millions of public across the world everyday can be considered as the "media coverage", and is extensive. 3. Hundreds Editorial Board members in the five journals are all from the top universities and academic institutes across the world. Many of them are distinguished investigators, physicians with international reputation in their research field. The reason for these high profile scientists across the world are participating and supporting the subject in discussion is because the cause of this company pursuing is Notable. 4. As a strong believer and long time supporter of the effort of making the knowledge freely available like the air to everyone on this planet, I truly believe that this page is worth the keeping. |
|||