Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Redeye cicada02.jpg
Appearance
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/53/Redeye_cicada02.jpg/250px-Redeye_cicada02.jpg)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/c2/Redeye_cicada.jpg/250px-Redeye_cicada.jpg)
- Reason
- High quality image of a distinctive Australian Cicada
- Articles this image appears in
- Psaltoda moerens and Cicada
- Creator
- Fir0002
- Support as nominator --Fir0002 05:26, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
- Support original - EV and quality are good. I like the original because the view shows more of the insect rather just from one direction (what we engineers like to call isometric versus plan view). Isometric typically offers a better overall viewing in my line o' work. ~ Wadester16 (talk) 06:56, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
- Support original. Good sharpness and DOF on this macro, and the exposure seems about right, showing the shiny wings without any major blown highlights. Diliff | (Talk) (Contribs) 06:38, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
- Support for quality and EV. Fletcher (talk) 22:38, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
- Weak Support Original They are reasonably sharp and so on but I don't however think the lighting is ideal. Due to the relatively large size of the subject (110-120mm wingspan) the light is pretty much on-axis and resultantly not particularly pleasing. The alternate in particular has that direct on axis flash look to it due to the glossy leaves. Noodle snacks (talk) 04:34, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
Promoted Image:Redeye cicada02.jpg --Noodle snacks (talk) 10:40, 16 December 2008 (UTC)