Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/ National Park

Reason: This is a stunning and sharp image of an double arches taken at Arches National Park.
Arches National Park
Creator: User: Flicka

Support as nominator - Milk's Favorite Cookie 21:36, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support the contrast, clarity, and color is good, and the subject is well enough situated to make it feature picture worthy. Rudy Breteler (talk) 21:40, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Durova^Charge! 21:59, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This doesn't appear to be a double arch. Can you explain? Is it the view back down the trail coming through the first arch, or how does it work? Clegs (talk) 22:25, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Response copied off my talk page: "If you look closely, under the first large arch, is a small hole, and you can see another arch. This resembles a double arch. - Milk's Favorite Cookie 22:46, 1 February 2008 (UTC)" Thanks for clearing this up! Clegs (talk) 23:54, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The view through the whole that I think is supposed to double of the arch looks very flat and possibly artifacted, and the shadow under the main arch has some out-of-place pink noise. Otherwise, I love this image, and would support if these issues can be fixed or if they can be explained. - Enuja (talk) 03:03, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Oppose It's a nice scene but the rocks and the shrub in the lower LHS have a lost a lot of texture from what I suspect was a noise reduction filter. Whether or not this is the case these areas have an unpleasant plasticky texture. --Fir0002 10:41, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support Nice picture. —αἰτίας •discussion• 15:15, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support, good lighting and nice angle. _{WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN}^{play it cool.} 18:49, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Fir. Cat-five - talk 02:24, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Schcambo (talk) 13:31, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted Image:Double-O-Arch Arches National Park 2.jpg MER-C 06:47, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]