Jump to content

User talk:Canderson7: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Reply to your criticism
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 40: Line 40:
==Reply==
==Reply==
I have seen your criticism of article [[Human rights in Russia]] and agree that article should be improved. Unfortunately, there is a [[User:ellol]] who effectively controls this article and with whom I have a history of difficult relations, up to ArbCom level [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Boris_Stomakhin/Evidence#Threats_by_User:ellol]. After first my attempt to improve this article, he immediately reverted everything. Would you agree to mediate editing of this article per WP rules, such as [[WP:NPOV]]? Then I could still try to do something. Otherwise, this is simply waste of time based on my previous experience. Thank you for your interest to this subject. [[User:Biophys|Biophys]] ([[User talk:Biophys|talk]]) 15:30, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
I have seen your criticism of article [[Human rights in Russia]] and agree that article should be improved. Unfortunately, there is a [[User:ellol]] who effectively controls this article and with whom I have a history of difficult relations, up to ArbCom level [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Boris_Stomakhin/Evidence#Threats_by_User:ellol]. After first my attempt to improve this article, he immediately reverted everything. Would you agree to mediate editing of this article per WP rules, such as [[WP:NPOV]]? Then I could still try to do something. Otherwise, this is simply waste of time based on my previous experience. Thank you for your interest to this subject. [[User:Biophys|Biophys]] ([[User talk:Biophys|talk]]) 15:30, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

==Any Admin can help==
Please stop Zakipfc from vandalizing [[Battle of Kosovo]], he has done so a dozen or more times in the past three weeks, and when editors revert his vandalism and warn him on his Talk Page, he just reverts back and ignores the warning. While there appears to be some knowledge of the subject in his edits, the bulk of contributions are ungrammatical, and otherwise skewed. [[Special:Contributions/69.148.162.7|69.148.162.7]] ([[User talk:69.148.162.7|talk]]) 16:46, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:55, 30 March 2008

This page has been archived five times: Archive 1, Archive 2, Archive 3, Archive 4, Archive 5


Please post new messages to the bottom of my talk page. Please use headlines when starting new talk topics. Please sign all posts with ~~~~. Thank you.




Wikipedia:Babel
en This user is a native speaker of English.
This user is an administrator on the English Wikipedia.
Search user languages


Comment

You're probably right, it's not really vandalism. On the other hand, the user is repeatedly attacking both other editors and other nationalities. I agree that it's not vandalism, but I find it strange that there's no corresponding board on which to report obvious personal attacks and racism. JdeJ (talk) 16:26, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't know that, thanks! JdeJ (talk) 16:50, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

I have seen your criticism of article Human rights in Russia and agree that article should be improved. Unfortunately, there is a User:ellol who effectively controls this article and with whom I have a history of difficult relations, up to ArbCom level [1]. After first my attempt to improve this article, he immediately reverted everything. Would you agree to mediate editing of this article per WP rules, such as WP:NPOV? Then I could still try to do something. Otherwise, this is simply waste of time based on my previous experience. Thank you for your interest to this subject. Biophys (talk) 15:30, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Any Admin can help

Please stop Zakipfc from vandalizing Battle of Kosovo, he has done so a dozen or more times in the past three weeks, and when editors revert his vandalism and warn him on his Talk Page, he just reverts back and ignores the warning. While there appears to be some knowledge of the subject in his edits, the bulk of contributions are ungrammatical, and otherwise skewed. 69.148.162.7 (talk) 16:46, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]