Search results
There is a page named "Scraper sites" on Wikipedia
- Guide to deletion (glossary) Help, my article got nominated for deletion! Scraper (band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs |...4 KB (361 words) - 00:15, 24 January 2021
- copyright violating copy-pastes exact text or headlines from scraper sites or retail sites like autoportal.com. The old accounts are generally not reactivated...2 KB (250 words) - 18:55, 14 March 2018
- Move to wiktionary a dicdef neologism (53,000 google hits including scraper sites) Zzzzz 21:16, 22 December 2005 (UTC) Delete dictdef Jamie (talk/contribs)...2 KB (258 words) - 03:49, 30 March 2022
- any mentions of this company online other than a few directories or scraper sites. Pyrrho the Skipper (talk) 20:29, 13 May 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion...4 KB (357 words) - 23:32, 20 May 2022
- (UTC) Well, that was silly of you. This doesn't need to be picked up by scraper sites for all time. Per WP:BLP i suggest you self-revert on this obvious hoax...4 KB (474 words) - 14:13, 11 February 2022
- left is the main page from the channel broadcasting the show, and a scraper site. Nothing to show this meets notability. The creator needs to strongly...3 KB (288 words) - 16:02, 15 June 2022
- page. Brad101 00:43, 24 August 2006 (UTC) Italylink.com appears to be a scraper site. Most likely Italylink.com copied the text from WP, as wikipedia has...2 KB (177 words) - 16:08, 9 February 2023
- July 2021 (UTC) Delete: Not a notable person, last source was a junk scraper site (removed), feels like WP:PAID or WP:COI editing happening here Ravensfire...4 KB (389 words) - 05:46, 19 May 2022
- Try the google test, does the station even have a web site that isn't an squatter/scraper site? Dbchip 06:20, 23 March 2006 (UTC) Comment i/PAX is sort...4 KB (438 words) - 08:27, 7 February 2023
- 'references' don't stand up to scrutiny, and the Google-test mostly showed up scraper sites, not reliable sources. --Davémon 00:03, 11 February 2007 (UTC) In your...19 KB (2,924 words) - 10:52, 3 February 2022
- scraper-plagiarism_websites - original discussion Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_357#Fr24_News,_and_synonym-spam_sites_in_general...4 KB (339 words) - 23:33, 8 August 2022
- Chiswick Chap (talk) 11:06, 15 October 2012 (UTC) CommentThe site you mention could be a scraper site which basically republishes things from Wikipedia. I put...6 KB (596 words) - 10:46, 13 February 2022
- Express Entertainment: Not enough significant coverage in the sources, scraper sites or casual mentions Ravensfire (talk) 17:22, 26 December 2022 (UTC) Relisted...9 KB (953 words) - 02:04, 6 January 2023
- archive.org scraper looking for pageclicks and wrapping ads around them. User has also added links to several articles to film links on their site, undercutting...3 KB (304 words) - 20:15, 6 February 2023
- The latter is no longer literally true thanks mainly to wikipedia scraper sites, but the only non-wikipedia derived hit is a brief report of a talk...8 KB (964 words) - 16:16, 2 February 2022
- (talk) 06:40, 28 September 2012 (UTC) Delete This seems to be a scraper/aggregation web site of no particular notability. --John Nagle (talk) 07:08, 28 September...5 KB (410 words) - 15:43, 5 February 2023
- SEO sink; I've removed the other press release / paid placement sites, and the scraper. I've seen the same SEO ads for Vents as well. Kuru (talk) 23:36...4 KB (484 words) - 03:43, 2 October 2021
- those links are to outdated viral job advertisements on blogs, lists, scraper sites, and so on, around the world. If anything, Interac is good at spreading...19 KB (2,495 words) - 01:58, 18 April 2022
- 15:12, 1 September 2010 (UTC) That site looks like yet another unattributed and not very skillful Wikipedia scraper (you can tell by how they mangle the...5 KB (391 words) - 03:29, 13 March 2023
- developed organically rather than being added in one chunk. That site is clearly some sort of scraper which puts together pages based on other bits of information...5 KB (395 words) - 12:43, 3 June 2018
- Appropedia:Public Domain Search - based on sites which are (mostly) public domain. That's mostly US Federal Govt sites, so I'm not sure if that's of interest
- a phony put-up operation or merely a scraper/compiler of internet material (as some otherwise good-looking sites are) then I would change my vote to delete