Health ecology: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Made some wording and punctuation changes in the introduction and first paragraph of History.
Emw1002 (talk | contribs)
m Comma errors and syntax
Line 4: Line 4:
[[File:Conceptual-map-illustrating-the-connections-among-nonhuman-nature-ecosystem-services-environmental-ethics-environmental.jpg|thumb|400px|Conceptual map illustrating the connections among nonhuman nature, [[ecosystem services]], [[environmental ethics]], [[environmental justice]], and public health.]]
[[File:Conceptual-map-illustrating-the-connections-among-nonhuman-nature-ecosystem-services-environmental-ethics-environmental.jpg|thumb|400px|Conceptual map illustrating the connections among nonhuman nature, [[ecosystem services]], [[environmental ethics]], [[environmental justice]], and public health.]]


<ref>{{Citation |title=Main Page |date=2022-10-05 |url=https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Main_Page&oldid=1114291180 |work=Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia |language=en |access-date=2022-10-18}}</ref>'''Health ecology''' (also known as '''eco-health''') is an emerging field that studies the changes in the Earth's [[ecosystems]] and their impact on [[Health|human health]].[1] Health ecology examines alterations in the [[Biology|biological]], [[Physical environment|physical]], [[Social environment|social]], and [[economic environment]] to understand how these changes impact human mental and physical health. Common examples of such effects include an increase in [[asthma]] rates due to [[air pollution]], [[Polychlorinated biphenyl|PCB]] contamination of [[game fish]] in the [[Great Lakes]] of the [[United States]], and [[habitat fragmentation]] as the main factor of the increased rate of [[Lyme disease]] in human populations.[2]
<ref>{{Citation |title=Main Page |date=2022-10-05 |url=https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Main_Page&oldid=1114291180 |work=Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia |language=en |access-date=2022-10-18}}</ref> '''Health ecology''' (also known as '''eco-health''') is an emerging field that studies the changes in the Earth's [[ecosystems]] and their impact on [[Health|human health]].[1] Health ecology examines [[Biology|biological]], [[Physical environment|physical]], [[Social environment|social]], and [[Economic environment|economic environmental alterations]] to understand how these changes impact mental and physical health. Common examples of such effects include an increase in [[asthma]] rates due to [[air pollution]], [[Polychlorinated biphenyl|PCB]] contamination of [[game fish]] in the [[Great Lakes]] of the [[United States]], and [[habitat fragmentation]] as the main factor of the increased rate of [[Lyme disease]] in human populations.[2]


[[Ecology]] pertains broadly to the relationships between organisms and the environment. The field of ecology and health examines the influence of conditions in the physical and socio-cultural environment on an individual's [[Physiology|physiological]], [[social]], and [[Emotion|emotional]] wellbeing in society and [[public health]].
[[Ecology]] pertains broadly to the relationships between organisms and the environment. The field of ecology and health examines the influence of conditions in the physical and socio-cultural environment on an individual's [[Physiology|physiological]], [[social]], and [[Emotion|emotional]] well-being in society and [[public health]].


==[[History]]==
==[[History]]==
Line 14: Line 14:
Integrated approaches to Health and ecology re-emerged in the 1990s and included One Health conservation medicine, [[ecological resilience]], ecological integrity, health communities, and a variety of other approaches. These new movements were able to draw on a tradition that stretches from Hippocrates to Rudolf Virchow and Louis Pasteur, who did not recognize the boundaries between human and animal medicine; environmental and social change to William Osler, who was a member of both the McGill medical faculty and the Montreal Veterinary College, also to Calvin Schwabe, whose 1984 book, Veterinary Medicine and Human Health, is a classic in the field; and lastly to James Steele, who founded the first veterinary public health unit in the United States.
Integrated approaches to Health and ecology re-emerged in the 1990s and included One Health conservation medicine, [[ecological resilience]], ecological integrity, health communities, and a variety of other approaches. These new movements were able to draw on a tradition that stretches from Hippocrates to Rudolf Virchow and Louis Pasteur, who did not recognize the boundaries between human and animal medicine; environmental and social change to William Osler, who was a member of both the McGill medical faculty and the Montreal Veterinary College, also to Calvin Schwabe, whose 1984 book, Veterinary Medicine and Human Health, is a classic in the field; and lastly to James Steele, who founded the first veterinary public health unit in the United States.


Eco-health approaches, as currently practiced, are participatory, systems-based approaches to understanding and promoting Health and well-being in the context of social and ecological interactions. Differentiating these approaches from earlier integrative attempts is a firm grounding in complexity theories and [[post-normal science]] (Waltner-Toews, 2004; Waltner-Toews et al., 2008). While various organizations promote integrative approaches, such as One Health, the worldwide primary funding. After a decade of international conferences in [[North America]] and [[Australia]] under the more contentious umbrella of "[[ecosystem health]]", the first "ecosystem approach to human health" (eco health) forum was held in [[Montreal]] in 2003, followed by conferences and forums in [[Wisconsin|Wisconsin, U.S]]., and [[Mérida, Yucatán|Mérida]], Mexico, all with major support from IDRC. Since then the International Association for Ecology and Health, and the journal ''Eco Health'' have established the field as a legitimate scholarly and development activity.
Eco-health approaches, as currently practiced, are participatory, systems-based approaches to understanding and promoting Health and well-being in the context of social and ecological interactions. Differentiating these approaches from earlier integrative attempts is a firm grounding in complexity theories and [[post-normal science]] (Waltner-Toews, 2004; Waltner-Toews et al., 2008). Various organizations promote integrative approaches, such as One Health, the worldwide primary funding. After a decade of international conferences in [[North America]] and [[Australia]] under the more contentious umbrella of "[[ecosystem health]]", the first "ecosystem approach to human health" (eco-health) forum was held in [[Montreal]] in 2003, followed by conferences and forums in [[Wisconsin|Wisconsin, U.S]]., and [[Mérida, Yucatán|Mérida]], Mexico, all with significant support from IDRC. Since then, the International Association for Ecology and Health and the journal ''Eco Health'' have established the field as a legitimate scholarly and development activity.







==Differences==
==Differences==
Eco-health studies differ from traditional, single-discipline studies. A formal [[Epidemiology|epidemiological]] study may show increasing rates of malaria in a region but does not address the reasons for the increasing rate. An environmental health study may recommend the spraying of a pesticide in specific amounts in certain areas to reduce spread. An economic analysis may calculate the cost and effectiveness per dollar spent on such a program. An eco-health study uses a different approach. It brings the multiple specialist disciplines together with members of the affected community before the study begins. Through pre-study meetings, the group shares knowledge and adopts a common language. These pre-study meetings often lead to creative and novel approaches and can lead to a more "socially robust" solution. Eco-health practitioners term this synergy [[Transdisciplinarity|transdisciplinary]] and differentiate it from multidisciplinary studies. Eco-health studies also value the participation of all active groups, including decision-makers. They believe issues of equity (between gender, socioeconomic classes, age, and even species) are essential to understand the problem to be studied thoroughly. Jean Lebel (2003) phrased transdisciplinary, participation, and equity as the three pillars of Eco Health (Lebel, 2003). The IDRC now speaks of six principles instead of three pillars, namely transdisciplinary, participation, gender and social equity, system-thinking, sustainability, and research-to-action (Charron, 2011)<ref>{{cite book | vauthors = Charron DF |chapter=Ecohealth: Origins and Approach|date=2011-09-02| veditors = Charron DF |title=Ecohealth Research in Practice|pages=1–30|publisher=Springer New York|doi=10.1007/978-1-4614-0517-7_1|isbn=978-1-4614-0516-0}}</ref>
Eco-health studies differ from traditional, single-discipline studies. A formal [[Epidemiology|epidemiological]] study may show increasing rates of malaria in a region but does not address the reasons for the increasing speed. An environmental health study may recommend spraying a pesticide in specific amounts in certain areas to reduce spread. An economic analysis may calculate the cost and effectiveness per dollar spent on such a program. An eco-health study uses a different approach. It brings the multiple specialist disciplines together with members of the affected community before the study begins. Through pre-study meetings, the group shares knowledge and adopts a common language. These pre-study meetings often lead to creative and novel approaches and can lead to a more "socially robust" solution. Eco-health practitioners term this synergy [[Transdisciplinarity|transdisciplinary]] and differentiate it from multidisciplinary studies. Eco-health studies also value the participation of all active groups, including decision-makers. They believe issues of equity (between gender, socioeconomic classes, age, and even species) are essential to understand the problem to be studied thoroughly. Jean Lebel (2003) phrased transdisciplinary, participation, and equity as the three pillars of Eco Health (Lebel, 2003). The IDRC now speaks of six principles instead of three pillars, namely transdisciplinary, participation, gender and social equity, system-thinking, sustainability, and research-to-action (Charron, 2011)[1]


=== Examples ===
=== Examples ===
A practical example of health ecology is the management of [[malaria]] in Mexico. A [[Interdisciplinarity|multidisciplinary]] approach ended the use of [[DDT]] harm while reducing malaria cases. This study reveals the nature of the complex interactions of the problem and the extent to which a successful solution must cross research disciplines. The solution involved creative thinking on the part of many individuals and produced a win-win situation for researchers, businesses, and, most importantly, the community. Although many of the dramatic effects of ecosystem change and much of the research are focused on developing countries, the ecosystem of the [[Artificiality|artificial]] environment in urban areas of the developed world is also a significant determinant of human Health. Obesity, [[diabetes]], asthma, and heart disease are all directly related to how humans interact with the local urban ecosystem in which they live. In addition, urban design and planning determine car use, food choices available, air pollution levels, and the safety and walkability of the neighborhoods in which people live.
A practical example of health ecology is the management of [[malaria]] in Mexico. A [[Interdisciplinarity|multidisciplinary]] approach ended the use of [[DDT]] harm while reducing malaria cases. This study reveals the nature of the complex interactions of the problem and the extent to which a successful solution must cross research disciplines. The solution involved creative thinking on the part of many individuals and produced a win-win situation for researchers, businesses, and, most importantly, the community. Although many of the dramatic effects of ecosystem change and much of the research are focused on developing countries, the ecosystem of the [[Artificiality|artificial]] environment in urban areas of the developed world is also a significant determinant of human health. Obesity, [[diabetes]], asthma, and heart disease are all directly related to how humans interact with the local urban ecosystem in which they live. In addition, urban design and planning determine car use, food choices available, air pollution levels, and the safety and walkability of the neighborhoods in which people live.


== References ==
== References ==

Revision as of 13:52, 5 November 2022

Conceptual map illustrating the connections among nonhuman nature, ecosystem services, environmental ethics, environmental justice, and public health.

[1] Health ecology (also known as eco-health) is an emerging field that studies the changes in the Earth's ecosystems and their impact on human health.[1] Health ecology examines biological, physical, social, and economic environmental alterations to understand how these changes impact mental and physical health. Common examples of such effects include an increase in asthma rates due to air pollution, PCB contamination of game fish in the Great Lakes of the United States, and habitat fragmentation as the main factor of the increased rate of Lyme disease in human populations.[2]

Ecology pertains broadly to the relationships between organisms and the environment. The field of ecology and health examines the influence of conditions in the physical and socio-cultural environment on an individual's physiological, social, and emotional well-being in society and public health.

History

Ecosystem approaches to health emerged as a defined field of inquiry and application in the 1990s, primarily through global research supported by the International Development Research Centre (IDRC) in Ottawa, Canada (Lebel, 2003). However, this was a resurrection of an approach to health and ecology that can be traced back, in Western societies, to Hippocrates and even earlier eras in Eastern societies. The approach was prominent among many scientists in the 18th and 19th centuries but fell out of common practice in the twentieth century when technical professionalism and expertise were assumed to be sufficient to deal with health and disease. In this relatively brief era, evaluation of the adverse human health impacts of environmental change (both the natural and artificial environment) was allotted to the fields of medicine and environmental health. As championed by scholars and practitioners such as Calvin Schwabe, one medicine was primarily considered a marginal activity.

Integrated approaches to Health and ecology re-emerged in the 1990s and included One Health conservation medicine, ecological resilience, ecological integrity, health communities, and a variety of other approaches. These new movements were able to draw on a tradition that stretches from Hippocrates to Rudolf Virchow and Louis Pasteur, who did not recognize the boundaries between human and animal medicine; environmental and social change to William Osler, who was a member of both the McGill medical faculty and the Montreal Veterinary College, also to Calvin Schwabe, whose 1984 book, Veterinary Medicine and Human Health, is a classic in the field; and lastly to James Steele, who founded the first veterinary public health unit in the United States.

Eco-health approaches, as currently practiced, are participatory, systems-based approaches to understanding and promoting Health and well-being in the context of social and ecological interactions. Differentiating these approaches from earlier integrative attempts is a firm grounding in complexity theories and post-normal science (Waltner-Toews, 2004; Waltner-Toews et al., 2008). Various organizations promote integrative approaches, such as One Health, the worldwide primary funding. After a decade of international conferences in North America and Australia under the more contentious umbrella of "ecosystem health", the first "ecosystem approach to human health" (eco-health) forum was held in Montreal in 2003, followed by conferences and forums in Wisconsin, U.S., and Mérida, Mexico, all with significant support from IDRC. Since then, the International Association for Ecology and Health and the journal Eco Health have established the field as a legitimate scholarly and development activity.



Differences

Eco-health studies differ from traditional, single-discipline studies. A formal epidemiological study may show increasing rates of malaria in a region but does not address the reasons for the increasing speed. An environmental health study may recommend spraying a pesticide in specific amounts in certain areas to reduce spread. An economic analysis may calculate the cost and effectiveness per dollar spent on such a program. An eco-health study uses a different approach. It brings the multiple specialist disciplines together with members of the affected community before the study begins. Through pre-study meetings, the group shares knowledge and adopts a common language. These pre-study meetings often lead to creative and novel approaches and can lead to a more "socially robust" solution. Eco-health practitioners term this synergy transdisciplinary and differentiate it from multidisciplinary studies. Eco-health studies also value the participation of all active groups, including decision-makers. They believe issues of equity (between gender, socioeconomic classes, age, and even species) are essential to understand the problem to be studied thoroughly. Jean Lebel (2003) phrased transdisciplinary, participation, and equity as the three pillars of Eco Health (Lebel, 2003). The IDRC now speaks of six principles instead of three pillars, namely transdisciplinary, participation, gender and social equity, system-thinking, sustainability, and research-to-action (Charron, 2011)[1]

Examples

A practical example of health ecology is the management of malaria in Mexico. A multidisciplinary approach ended the use of DDT harm while reducing malaria cases. This study reveals the nature of the complex interactions of the problem and the extent to which a successful solution must cross research disciplines. The solution involved creative thinking on the part of many individuals and produced a win-win situation for researchers, businesses, and, most importantly, the community. Although many of the dramatic effects of ecosystem change and much of the research are focused on developing countries, the ecosystem of the artificial environment in urban areas of the developed world is also a significant determinant of human health. Obesity, diabetes, asthma, and heart disease are all directly related to how humans interact with the local urban ecosystem in which they live. In addition, urban design and planning determine car use, food choices available, air pollution levels, and the safety and walkability of the neighborhoods in which people live.

References

  1. ^ "Main Page", Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, 2022-10-05, retrieved 2022-10-18

Further reading

External links

Conferences

Journals

Organizations