Presumptive inclusion: Difference between revisions
Citation bot (talk | contribs) Add: ssrn. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Abductive | #UCB_webform 3815/3850 |
Superb Owl (talk | contribs) adding a modern example of how presumptive inclusion is used in arguments for political suffrage of children/youth |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
== Democratic usage == |
== Democratic usage == |
||
Democratic theorists, especially those hoping to achieve something closer to [[universal suffrage]], often support some form of presumptive inclusion, where the legal system would protect the voting rights of all subjects by default unless the government can clearly prove that disenfranchisement of a particular group or person is necessary |
Democratic theorists, especially those hoping to achieve something closer to [[universal suffrage]], often support some form of presumptive inclusion, where the legal system would protect the voting rights of all subjects by default unless the government can clearly prove that disenfranchisement of a particular group or person is necessary.<ref>Hamilton, Vivian E., Democratic Inclusion, Cognitive Development, and the Age of Electoral Majority (2012). Brooklyn Law Review, Vol. 77, No. 4, 2012, Available at SSRN: <nowiki>https://ssrn.com/abstract=2086875</nowiki></ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Olsson |first=Stefan |date=2008 |title=Children's Suffrage: A Critique of the Importance of Voters' Knowledge for the Well-Being of Democracy |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/092755608x267120 |journal=The International Journal of Children's Rights |volume=16 |issue=1 |page=56 |doi=10.1163/092755608x267120 |issn=0927-5568}}</ref> One example where the term has gotten some usage is in the arguments in favor of [[children and youth suffrage]], where Eric Wiland argues, "children should have the right to vote unless there is a good reason to disenfranchise them."<ref>{{Citation |last=Wiland |first=Eric |title=Should Children Have the Right to Vote? |date=2018 |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93907-0_17 |work=The Palgrave Handbook of Philosophy and Public Policy |page=223 |place=Cham |publisher=Springer International Publishing |isbn=978-3-319-93906-3 |access-date=2023-02-19}}</ref>{{Democracy sidebar}} |
||
=== Analogies === |
=== Analogies === |
||
Revision as of 05:26, 19 February 2023
Presumptive inclusion is the idea that something should first be presumed to be included, and only omitted after the fact if justified. It has common uses in democracy and medicine.
Democratic usage
Democratic theorists, especially those hoping to achieve something closer to universal suffrage, often support some form of presumptive inclusion, where the legal system would protect the voting rights of all subjects by default unless the government can clearly prove that disenfranchisement of a particular group or person is necessary.[1][2] One example where the term has gotten some usage is in the arguments in favor of children and youth suffrage, where Eric Wiland argues, "children should have the right to vote unless there is a good reason to disenfranchise them."[3]
| Part of the Politics series |
| Democracy |
|---|
 Politics portal |
Analogies
Innocent until proven guilty is a principle where one's freedom is a right that must be disproven beyond a reasonable doubt before it is taken away. Similarly, voting could be seen as such a right that the government must meet a high bar (how high is disputed) before revoking it for any individual.
Freedom of speech also has very strong protections in democracies, with very few limitations. Voting has been described as speech by opponents to compulsory voting, arguing that it could entail compelled speech.[4]
Implications
In practice, this could mean that the same standards that qualify adults as competent to vote could be extended by default to kids, allowing youth and children to vote. In addition, many more (if not all) residents could be enfranchised.[5]
See also
References
- ^ Hamilton, Vivian E., Democratic Inclusion, Cognitive Development, and the Age of Electoral Majority (2012). Brooklyn Law Review, Vol. 77, No. 4, 2012, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2086875
- ^ Olsson, Stefan (2008). "Children's Suffrage: A Critique of the Importance of Voters' Knowledge for the Well-Being of Democracy". The International Journal of Children's Rights. 16 (1): 56. doi:10.1163/092755608x267120. ISSN 0927-5568.
- ^ Wiland, Eric (2018), "Should Children Have the Right to Vote?", The Palgrave Handbook of Philosophy and Public Policy, Cham: Springer International Publishing, p. 223, ISBN 978-3-319-93906-3, retrieved February 19, 2023
- ^ Note, The Case for Compulsory Voting in the United States, 121 Harv. L. Rev. 591, 601–603 (2007). Harvard is one of several law schools at which students may submit articles for publication in the school's law review but only anonymously in the form of "Notes" (with a capital "N").
- ^ Hamilton, Vivian E. (2012). "Democratic Inclusion, Cognitive Development, and the Age of Electoral Majority". Brooklyn Law Review. 77 (4). Rochester, NY: 1482, 1489. SSRN 2086875.