Stramenopile: Difference between revisions
→History and the Heterokont problem: cite book |
ref |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| taxon = Stramenopila |
| taxon = Stramenopila |
||
| authority = |
| authority = |
||
| subdivision_ranks = Phyla and subphyla<ref name="8phyla">{{cite journal |last=Cavalier-Smith |first=Thomas |title=Kingdom Chromista and its eight phyla: a new synthesis emphasising periplastid protein targeting, cytoskeletal and periplastid evolution, and ancient divergences|date=2017 |journal=Protoplasma |pages=297–357 |volume=255 |issue=1 |doi=10.1007/s00709-017-1147-3 |pmid=28875267 |pmc=5756292 }}</ref> |
|||
| subdivision_ranks = Phyla and subphyla<ref name="8phyla"/> |
|||
| subdivision = |
| subdivision = |
||
*[[Bigyra]] |
*[[Bigyra]] |
||
Revision as of 21:42, 16 March 2023
 | It has been suggested that this article be merged with Heterokont. (Discuss) Proposed since March 2023. |
| Stramenopile | |
|---|---|
| |
| Ochromonas sp. (Chrysophyceae), with two unequal (heterokont) flagella. Mastigonemes not represented. | |
Scientific classification 
| |
| Missing taxonomy template (fix): | Stramenopila |
| Phyla and subphyla[1] | |
| Synonyms | |
Stramenopile is a clade of organisms distinguished by the presence of stiff tripartite external hairs. In most species, the hairs are attached to flagella, in some they are attached to other areas of the cellular surface, and in some they have been secondarily lost (in which case relatedness to stramenopile ancestors is evident from other shared cytological features or from genetic similarity). Stramenopiles represent one of the three major clades in the SAR supergroup, along with Alveolata and Rhizaria.
Members of the clade are referred to as 'stramenopiles'. Stramenopiles are eukaryotes; since they are neither fungi, animals, nor plants, they are classified as protists. Most stramenopiles are single-celled, but some are multicellular algae including some brown algae. The group includes a variety of algal protists, heterotrophic flagellates, opalines and closely related proteromonad flagellates (all endobionts in other organisms); the actinophryid heliozoa, and oomycetes. The tripartite hairs have been lost in some stramenopiles - for example in most diatoms (although these organisms still express mastigonemic proteins - see below).
Many stramenopiles are unicellular flagellates, and most others produce flagellated cells at some point in their lifecycles, for instance as gametes or zoospores. Most flagellated heterokonts have two flagella; the anterior flagellum has one or two rows of stiff hairs or mastigonemes, and the posterior flagellum is without such embellishments, being smooth, usually shorter, or in a few cases not projecting from the cell.
History and the Heterokont problem
The term 'Stramenopile' was introduced in 1989.[10] It identified a group that overlapped with the ambiguously defined heterokonts.
The term 'heterokont' is used as both an adjective - indicating that the flagella of flagellated cells are dissimilar - and as the name of a taxon. In the latter context, 'Heterokontae' had been introduced in 1899 by Alexander Luther for algae that are now considered the Xanthophyceae.:[11] But the same term was used for other groupings of algae. For example, in 1956, Copeland[12] used it to include the xanthophytes (using the name Vaucheriacea), a group that included what became known as the chrysophytes, the silicoflagellates, and the hyphochytrids. Copeland also included the unrelated collar flagellates (as the Choanoflagellata) in which he placed the bicosoecids (a type of stramenopile). He also included the not-closely-related haptophytes. The consequence of associating multiple concepts to the taxon 'heterokont' is that the meaning of 'heterokont' can only be made clear by making reference to its usage: Heterokontae sensu Luther 1899; Heterokontae sensu Copeland 1956, etc. This contextual clarification is rare, such that when the taxon name is used, it is unclear how it should be understood. The term 'Heterokont' has lost its usefulness in critical discussions about the identity, nature, character and relatedness of the group.[13] The term 'stramenopile' sought to identify a clade (monophyletic and holophyletic lineage) using the approach developed by transformed cladists of pointing to a defining innovative characteristic or apomorphy.[14]
The presumed apomorphy of tripartite flagellar hairs in stramenopiles is well characterized. The basal part of the hair is flexible and inserts into the cell membrane, the second part is dominated by a long stiff tube (the 'straw' or 'stramen'), and finally the tube is tipped by several delicate hairs.[15] The proteins that code for the mastigonemes are also well characterized.[16] As far as we know, these proteins are exclusive to the stramenopile clade, and are present even in taxa (such as diatoms) that no longer have physical hairs.
Most stramenopiles have two flagella that insert subapically or laterally. They are usually supported by four microtubule roots in a distinctive pattern (details to be included later). There is also a transitional helix inside the flagellum where the beating axoneme with its distinctive 9 peripheral couplets and two central microtubules changes into the nine triplet structure of the basal body.
Classification
The simplified classification of the group according to Adl et al. (2012) is:[17]
- Stramenopiles Patterson, 1989, emend. Adl et al., 2005
- Opalinata Wenyon, 1926, emend. Cavalier-Smith, 1997 (Slopalinida Patterson, 1985)
- Blastocystis Alexeev, 1911
- Bicosoecida Grassé, 1926, emend. Karpov, 1998
- Placidida Moriya et al., 2002
- Labyrinthulomycetes Dick, 2001
- Hyphochytriales Sparrow, 1960
- Peronosporomycetes Dick, 2001 (Öomycetes Winter, 1897, emend. Dick, 1976)
- Actinophryidae Claus 1874, emend. Hartmann 1926
- Bolidomonas Guillou & Chrétiennot-Dinet, 1999 (Bolidophyceae in Guillou et al., 1999)
- Chrysophyceae Pascher, 1914
- Dictyochophyceae Silva, 1980
- Eustigmatales Hibberd, 1981
- Olisthodiscophyceae Barcytė, Eikrem & M.Eliáš, 2021[18][19]
- Pelagophyceae Andersen & Saunders, 1993
- Phaeothamniophyceae Andersen & Bailey, in Bailey et al., 1998
- Pinguiochrysidales Kawachi et al., 2003
- Raphidophyceae Chadefaud, 1950, emend. Silva, 1980
- Synurales Andersen, 1987
- Xanthophyceae Allorge, 1930, emend. Fritsch, 1935 (Heterokontae Luther, 1899, Heteromonadea Leedale, 1983, Xanthophyta Hibberd, 1990)
- Phaeophyceae Hansgirg, 1886 (not Kjellman, 1891, not Pfitzer, 1894)
- Schizocladia Henry et al., in Kawai et al., 2003 (Schizocladales Kawai et al., 2003) (M)
- Diatomea Dumortier, 1821 (= Bacillariophyta Haeckel, 1878)
The name of the taxon has also been written as Straminopiles, or more formally as Straminipila. The name "stramenopile" has been discussed by David (2002).[20]
In terms of relatedness among protists, Krylov and co-workers proposed that the morphology of mitochondrial cristae remained relatively unchanged over time, and would define large sectors of protistan diversity.[21] Subsequent molecular studies have confirmed this, with the stramenopiles being most closely related to Alveolates and Rhizaria - all with tubular mitochondrial cristae and collectively referred to as the SAR clade.[22]
Stramenochromes
The stramenopiles with plastids (stramenochromes)[23] have plastids with an off-green, orange, golden or brown color because of the occurrence of chlorophyll a, chlorophyll c, and fucoxanthin. This form of plastid is referred to as a chromoplast (as opposed to chloroplast which if used narrowly refers to the chlorophyll B containing plastids in green algae, some euglenids, and the land plants). The most significant autotrophic stramenopiles are the brown algae (wracks and many other seaweeds), and the diatoms. The latter are among the most significant primary producers in marine and freshwater ecosystems.
Chromoplasts are surrounded by four membranes. The outermost is continuous with the chloroplast endoplasmic reticulum, or cER. The second membrane presents a barrier between the lumen of the cER and the primary endosymbiont or chloroplast. The symbiont was the source of the two innermost membranes within which the thylakoid membranes are found.
Most molecular analyses suggest that the most basal stramenopiles are colorless heterotrophs.[24][25] This suggests that the stramenopiles arose as heterotrophic organisms, diversified, and only at a later stage in their evolutionary history did they acquire chromoplasts. Some lineages (such as the axodine lineage that included the chromophytic pedinellids, colourless ciliophryids, and colourless actinophryid heliozoa) have secondarily reverted to heterotrophy.
Ecology
Some stramenopiles are significant as autotrophs and as heterotrophs in natural ecosystems. Blastocystis is a parasite of humans; opalines and proteromonads live in the intestines of cold-blooded vertebrates; oomycetes include some significant plant pathogens (including the agent that caused the potato blight famine in Ireland that resulted in approximately one million deaths and led to extensive emigration). Diatoms are major contributors to global carbon cycles because they are the most important autotrophs in most marine habitats. The brown algae (or kelp) are major autotrophs of the intertidal and subtidal marine habitats. Some of the bacterivorous stramenopiles, such as Cafeteria are common and widespread consumers of bacteria, and thus play a major role in recycling carbon and nutrients within microbial food webs.[citation needed]
Phylogeny
External
The Stramenopiles are one of the three constituent groups that lend their initials to the SAR supergroup.[26]
.jpg)
Internal
The tree is based on Ruggiero et al. 2015 & Silar 2016.[27][28][29]
| Stramenopiles |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Heterokonts) |
References
- ^ Cavalier-Smith, Thomas (2017). "Kingdom Chromista and its eight phyla: a new synthesis emphasising periplastid protein targeting, cytoskeletal and periplastid evolution, and ancient divergences". Protoplasma. 255 (1): 297–357. doi:10.1007/s00709-017-1147-3. PMC 5756292. PMID 28875267.
- ^ Patterson, D.J. (1989). "Stramenopiles: Chromophytes from a protistan perspective". In Green, J.C.; Leadbeater, B.S.C.; Diver, W.L. (eds.). The chromophyte algae: Problems and perspectives. Clarendon Press. ISBN 978-0198577133.
- ^ Vørs, N (1993). "Marine heterotrophic amoebae, flagellates and heliozoa from Belize (Central America) and Tenerife". Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology. 40 (3): 272–287. doi:10.1111/j.1550-7408.1993.tb04917.x. S2CID 221852241.
- ^ David, J.C. (2002). "A preliminary catalogue of the names of fungi above the rank of order". Constancea. 83: 1–30.
- ^ Cavalier-Smith, T. (1999). "The kingdom Chromista, origin and systematics". In Round, F.E.; Chapman, D.J. (eds.). Progress in Phycological Research. Vol. 4. Elsevier. pp. 309–347. ISBN 978-0-948737-00-8.
- ^ van den Hoek, C.; Mann, D.G.; Jahns, H.M. (1995). Algae An Introduction to Phycology. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-30419-1.
- ^ Alexopoulos, C.J.; Mims, C.W.; Blackwell, M. (1996). Introductory Mycology (4th ed.). Wiley. ISBN 978-0471522294.
- ^ Dick, M.W. (2013). Straminipilous Fungi: Systematics of the Peronosporomycetes Including Accounts of the Marine Straminipilous Protists, the Plasmodiophorids and Similar Organisms. Springer. ISBN 978-94-015-9733-3.
- ^ "Stramenipila M.W. Dick (2001)". MycoBank. International Mycological Association.
- ^ Patterson, D. J. 1989. Stramenopiles: chromophytes from a protistological perspective. In: Green, J.C., Leadbeater, B.S.C. & Diver, W. L. 1989. The chromophyte algae: problems and perspectives. Clarendon Press, Oxford. 357-379
- ^ Luther, Alexander F. (1899). Über Chlorosaccus eine neue Gattung der Süsswasseralgen nebst einiger Bemerkungen zur Systematik verwandter Algen. Stockholm: Norstedt. pp. 1–22.
- ^ Copeland, H. F. (1956). The Classification of Lower Organisms. Palo Alto, California: Pacific Books.
- ^ Blackwell, W. H. (2009). "Chromista revisited: A dilemma of overlapping putative kingdoms, and the attempted application of the botanical code of nomenclature" (PDF). Phytologia. 91 (2).
- ^ Patterson, Colin (1982). "Morphological characters and homology". In Joysey, Kenneth A; Friday, A. E. (eds.). Problems in Phylogenetic Reconstruction. Systematics Association Special Volume 21. London: Academic Press. ISBN 978-0123912503.
- ^ Bouck, G.B. 1971. The structure, origin, and composition of the tubular mastigonemes of the Ochromonas flagellum. J. Cell. Biol., 50: 362-384
- ^ Blackman, L.M., Arikawa, M., Yamada, S., Suzaki, T., & Hardham, A. R. 2011. Identification of a Mastigoneme Protein from Phytophthora nicotianae. Protist 162: 100-114, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protis.2010.01.005.
- ^ Adl, Sina M; Simpson, Alastair G. B; Lane, Christopher E; Lukeš, Julius; Bass, David; Bowser, Samuel S; Brown, Matthew W; Burki, Fabien; Dunthorn, Micah; Hampl, Vladimir; Heiss, Aaron; Hoppenrath, Mona; Lara, Enrique; Le Gall, Line; Lynn, Denis H; McManus, Hilary; Mitchell, Edward A. D; Mozley-Stanridge, Sharon E; Parfrey, Laura W; Pawlowski, Jan; Rueckert, Sonja; Shadwick, Laura; Schoch, Conrad L; Smirnov, Alexey; Spiegel, Frederick W (2012). "The Revised Classification of Eukaryotes". Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology. 59 (5): 429–514. doi:10.1111/j.1550-7408.2012.00644.x. PMC 3483872. PMID 23020233.
- ^ Graf, Louis; Yoon, Hwan Su (21 July 2021). "Olisthodiscophyceae, the 17th heterokont algal class". Journal of Phycology. 57 (4): 1091–1093. doi:10.1111/jpy.13184. PMID 34289104. S2CID 236175098.
- ^ Barcytė, Dovilė; Eikrem, Wenche; Engesmo, Anette; Seoane, Sergio; Wohlmann, Jens; Horák, Aleš; Yurchenko, Tatiana; Eliáš, Marek (2 March 2021). "Olisthodiscus represents a new class of Ochrophyta". Journal of Phycology. 57 (4): 1094–1118. doi:10.1111/jpy.13155. hdl:10852/86515. PMID 33655496. S2CID 232101186.
- ^ David, J.C. 2002. A preliminary catalogue of the names of fungi above the rank of order. Constancea. 83: 1–30
- ^ Krylov, M. V., A. A. Dobrovolskii, I. V. Issi, B. I. Michaelevich, S. A. Podlipaev, V. V. Reshetnyak, L. N. Seravin, et al. 1980. New concepts for the system of unicellular organisms. Trudy Zoologischkei Institut Akademiya Na�yuk, SSSR 94:122–132.
- ^ Derelle R, López-García P, Timpano H, Moreira D. A Phylogenomic Framework to Study the Diversity and Evolution of Stramenopiles (= Heterokonts). Mol Biol Evol. 2016 Nov;33(11):2890-2898. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msw168. Epub 2016 Aug 10. PMID 27512113; PMCID: PMC5482393.
- ^ Leipe, D. D., P. O. Wainright, J. H. Gunderson, D. Porter, D. J. Patterson, F. Valois, S. Himmerich and M. L. Sogin. 1994. The stramenopiles from a molecular perspective: 16S-like rRNA sequences from Labyrinthuloides minuta and Cafeteria roenbergensis. Phycologia 33: 369-377
- ^ Leyland, B., Leu, S., Boussiba, S. 2017. Are Thraustochytrids algae? Fungal Biology,121:835-840
- ^ Derelle R, López-García P, Timpano H, Moreira D. A Phylogenomic Framework to Study the Diversity and Evolution of Stramenopiles (= Heterokonts). Mol Biol Evol. 2016 Nov;33(11):2890-2898. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msw168. Epub 2016 Aug 10. PMID 27512113; PMCID: PMC5482393.
- ^ Burki, F.; Shalchian-Tabrizi; Pawlowski, J. (August 2008). "Phylogenomics reveals a new 'megagroup' including most photosynthetic eukaryotes". Biology Letters. 4 (4): 366–369. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2008.0224. PMC 2610160. PMID 18522922.
- ^ Ruggiero; et al. (2015). "Higher Level Classification of All Living Organisms". PLOS ONE. 10 (4): e0119248. Bibcode:2015PLoSO..1019248R. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0119248. PMC 4418965. PMID 25923521.
- ^ Silar, Philippe (2016). "Protistes Eucaryotes: Origine, Evolution et Biologie des Microbes Eucaryotes". HAL Archives-ouvertes: 1–462.
- ^ Cavalier-Smith, Thomas; Scoble, Josephine Margaret (2013). "Phylogeny of Heterokonta: Incisomonas marina, a uniciliate gliding opalozoan related to Solenicola (Nanomonadea), and evidence that Actinophryida evolved from raphidophytes". European Journal of Protistology. 49 (3): 328–353. doi:10.1016/j.ejop.2012.09.002. PMID 23219323.