The global balance equations (also known as full balance equations) are a set of equations that in principle can always be solved to give the equilibrium distribution of a Markov chain (when such a distribution exists). For a Markov chain with state space S, transition rate from state i to j given by qij and equilibrium distribution given by , the global balance equations are given for every state i in S by
Here represents the probability flux from state i to state j. In general it is computationally intractable to solve this system of equations for most queueing models.
For a discrete time Markov chain with transition matrix P and equilibrium distribution the global balance equation is
holds, then the global balance equations are satisfied and is the stationary distribution of the process. If such a solution can be found the resulting equations are usually much easier than directly solving the global balance equations.
A CTMC is reversible if and only if the detailed balance conditions are satisfied for every pair of states i and j.
When a solution can be found, as in the case of a CTMC, the computation is usually much quicker than directly solving.
In some situations, terms on either side of the global balance equations cancel. The global balance equations can then be partitioned to give a set of local balance equations (also known as partial balance equations, independent balance equations or individual balance equations). These balance equations were first considered by Peter Whittle. The resulting equations are somewhere between detailed balance and global balance equations. Any solution to the local balance equations is always a solution to the global balance equations (we can recover the global balance equations by summing the relevant local balance equations), but the converse is not always true. Often, constructing local balance equations is equivalent to removing the outer summations in the global balance equations for certain terms.
- Harrison, Peter G.; Patel, Naresh M. (1992). Performance Modelling of Communication Networks and Computer Architectures. Addison-Wesley. ISBN 0-201-54419-9.
- Kelly, F. P. (1979). Reversibility and stochastic networks. J. Wiley. ISBN 0-471-27601-4.
- Chandy, K.M. (March 1972). "Proc. Sixth Annual Princeton Conference on Information Sciences and Systems, Princeton U.". Princeton, N.J. pp. 224–228.
- Grassman, Winfried K. (2000). Computational probability. Springer. ISBN 0-7923-8617-5.
- Bocharov, Pavel Petrovich; D'Apice, C.; Pechinkin, A.V.; Salerno, S. (2004). Queueing theory. Walter de Gruyter. p. 37. ISBN 90-6764-398-X.
- Norris, James R. (1998). Markov Chains. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-63396-6. Retrieved 2010-09-11.
- Baskett, F.; Chandy, K. Mani; Muntz, R.R.; Palacios, F.G. (1975). "Open, closed and mixed networks of queues with different classes of customers". Journal of the ACM 22: 248–260. doi:10.1145/321879.321887.
- Whittle, P. (1968). "Equilibrium Distributions for an Open Migration Process". Journal of Applied Probability 5 (3): 567–571. doi:10.2307/3211921. JSTOR 3211921.
- Chao, X.; Miyazawa, M. (1998). "On Quasi-Reversibility and Local Balance: An Alternative Derivation of the Product-Form Results". Operations Research 46 (6): 927–933. doi:10.1287/opre.46.6.927. JSTOR 222945.
- Boucherie, Richard J.; van Dijk, N.M. (1994). "Annals of Operations Research" 48. pp. 463–492.
- Chandy, K. Mani; Howard, J.H., Jr; Towsley, D.F. (1977). "Journal of the ACM" 24. pp. 250–263.
- Gelenbe, Erol (Sep 1993). "G-Networks with Triggered Customer Movement". Journal of Applied Probability 30 (3): 742–748. doi:10.2307/3214781. JSTOR 3214781.