Control rod

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Control rods)
Jump to: navigation, search
PWR control rod assembly, above fuel element

Control rods are used in nuclear reactors to control the fission rate of uranium and plutonium. They are made of chemical elements, such as boron, silver, indium and cadmium, that are capable of absorbing many neutrons without fissioning themselves. Because these elements have different capture cross sections for neutrons of varying energies, the compositions of the control rods must be designed for the neutron spectrum of the reactor they are supposed to control. Boiling water reactors (BWR), pressurized water reactors (PWR), and heavy water reactors (HWR) operate with thermal neutrons, whereas breeder reactors operate with fast neutrons.

Operation principle[edit]

Control rods are usually used in control rod assemblies (typically 20 rods for a commercial PWR assembly) and inserted into guide tubes within a fuel element. A control rod is removed from or inserted into the central core of a nuclear reactor in order to control the neutron flux to increase or decrease the number of neutrons which will split further uranium atoms. This in turn affects the thermal power of the reactor, the amount of steam produced, and hence the electricity generated.

Control rods often stand vertically within the core. In pressurized water reactors, they are inserted from above with the control rod drive mechanisms being mounted on the reactor pressure vessel head. Due to the necessity of a steam dryer above the core of a boiling water reactor, this design requires insertion of the control rods from underneath the core. The control rods are partially removed from the core to allow a chain reaction to occur. The number of control rods inserted and the distance by which they are inserted can be varied to control the reactivity of the reactor. Typically shutdown times for modern reactors like European Pressurized Reactor or Advanced CANDU reactor are 2 seconds for 90% reduction limited by decay heat.

Materials used[edit]

Chemical elements with a sufficiently high capture cross section for neutrons include silver, indium and cadmium. Other elements that can be used include boron, cobalt, hafnium, samarium, europium, gadolinium, terbium, dysprosium, holmium, erbium, thulium, ytterbium, and lutetium[1] or their alloys and compounds, e.g. high-boron steel (limited to use only in research reactors due to increased swelling from helium and lithium from neutron absorption of boron in the (n, alpha) reaction), silver-indium-cadmium alloy, boron carbide, zirconium diboride, titanium diboride, hafnium diboride, gadolinium nitrate (injected into D2O moderator of Advanced CANDU reactor), gadolinium titanate, and dysprosium titanate.

The choice of materials is influenced by the energy of neutrons in the reactor, their resistance to neutron-induced swelling, and the required mechanical and lifetime properties. The rods may have the form of tubes filled with neutron absorbing pellets or powder etc. out of stainless steel or other neutron window materials like zirconium, chromium, silicium carbide or c11B15N cubic boron nitride with very less capturing, low density, unburnable, insoluble, not rising any H2 like zirconium with water and heat, stable and dense up to 2800°C, melting 2973°C with very high thermal conductivity and moderation like graphite usable also for fuel rods with fuel just backed inside alpha boron nitride. The swelling of the material in the neutron flux can cause deformation of the rod, leading to its premature replacement.

The burn up of the absorbing isotopes is another limiting lifetime factor reduced by long capturing isotope rows of the same element or just by not using neutron absorbers for trimming over controlling the nuclear fuel amount at run time for example in pebble bed reactors or in possible new type 7lithium moderated and cooled reactors using fuel and absorber pebbles over using less fuel pebbles or empty placebo pebbles or over direct fuel & extraction in and out of 7lithium circle using continiously centrifuges etc. for taking out fission products like inside from fission produced samarium etc. reducing also the decay heat after shut down (starting normally with about 6-7% and quickly falling) and maximal possible contamination in accident cases (likely <0.2% compared with about 2% Fukushima and 20% Chernobyl of radioactive inventory set free).

The rare earth elements that are excellent neutron absorbers are partly less rare than silver (reserves about 500 000t) like ytterbium (reserves about 1 mio. t) and 400 times more common yttrium with middle capturing values and can be found and used together without separation inside minerals like xenotime(Yb) (Yb0,40Y0,27Lu0,12Er0,12Dy0,05Tm0,04Ho0,01)PO44,[2] or Keiviit(Yb) (Yb1,43Lu0,23Er0,17Tm0,08Y0,05Dy0,03Ho0,02)2Si2O7 for cheap price.[3] Also xenon is a strong neutron absorber as gas and can be used for controlling and (emergency) stopping of helium cooled reactors but not working in case of pressure loss or as burning protection gas together with argon around vessel part special in case of core catching reactors or if filled up with sodium or lithium etc. Xenon produced from fission inside reactor can be used after waiting enough time until caesium was falling out with practically no radioactivity left. 59Cobalt is used also as absorber for winning of 60cobalt for x/ray. Control rods can be constructed also as thick turnable rods with tungsten reflector and absorber side turned to stop by a spring in less than 1s used around the core of pebble bed reactors etc.

Silver-indium-cadmium alloys, generally 80% Ag, 15% In, and 5% Cd, are a common control rod material for pressurized water reactors. The somewhat different energy absorption regions of the materials make the alloy an excellent neutron absorber. It has good mechanical strength and can be easily fabricated. It has to be encased in stainless steel to prevent corrosion in hot water. Also indium is less rare than silver it is in praxis more expensive.

Boron is another common neutron absorber. Due to different cross sections of 10B and 11B, boron containing materials enriched in 10B by isotopic separation are frequently used. The wide absorption spectrum of boron makes it suitable also as a neutron shield. Mechanical properties of boron in its elementary form are unfavorable, therefore alloys or compounds have to be used instead. Common choices are high-boron steel and boron carbide. Boron carbide is used as a control rod material in both pressurized water reactors and boiling water reactors. 10B/11B separation is done commercially with gas centrifuges over BF3 but can be done also over BH3 from borane production or directly with an energy optimized melting centrifuge using the heat of fresh separated boron for preheating.

Hafnium has excellent properties for reactors using water for both moderation and cooling. It has good mechanical strength, can be easily fabricated, and is resistant to corrosion in hot water.[4] Hafnium can be alloyed with small amounts of other elements; e.g. tin and oxygen to increase tensile and creep strength, iron, chromium and niobium for corrosion resistance, and molybdenum for wear resistance, hardness, and machineability. Some such alloys are designated as Hafaloy, Hafaloy-M, Hafaloy-N, and Hafaloy-NM.[5] Its high cost and low availability limit its use in civilian reactors, though it is used in some US Navy reactors. Hafnium carbide can be used also as an insoluble material with a very high melting point of 3890°C and density higher than of uranium dioxide for sinking unmolten through a corium.

Dysprosium titanate is a new material currently undergoing evaluation for pressurized water control rods. Dysprosium titanate is a promising replacement for Ag-In-Cd alloys because it has a much higher melting point, does not tend to react with cladding materials, is easy to produce, does not produce radioactive waste, does not swell, and does not outgas. It was developed in Russia, and is recommended by some for VVER and RBMK reactors.[6] Disadvantage is less absorption of titanium and oxide and also other neutron absorbing elements are not reacting with the right already high melting point cladding materials and with just using the unseparated content also with dysprosium inside of minerals like Keiviit Yb inside chromium, SiC or c11B15N tubes are beating price and absorption also without swelling and gassing out and for highest melting point best using HfC.

Hafnium diboride is another such new material. It can be used standalone or prepared in a sintered mixture of hafnium and boron carbide powders.[7]

Possible are also much more compounds of rare earth elements, samarium etc. with boron like europium and samarium boride already used inside colour industry[8] or compounds of boron with less absorbing like titanium but cheap molybdenum as Mo2B5 etc. but all swelling with boron means for practice other compounds are better like carbides etc. or compounds with two or more neutron absorber elements together.

Important is that tungsten likely also other elements like tantalum[9] do have about the same high capturing like hafnium[10] but with opposite effect and that is not explainable only by neutron reflection so the only explanation is resonance gamma rays increasing the fission and breeding ratio over causing more capturing of uranium etc. over metastabil conditions like for isotope 235mU with a half time of about 26 min.

Additional means of reactivity regulation[edit]

Usually there are also other means of controlling reactivity: In the PWR design a soluble neutron absorber (boric acid) is added to the reactor coolant allowing the complete extraction of the control rods during stationary power operation ensuring an even power and flux distribution over the entire core. This chemical shim, along with the use of burnable neutron poisons within the fuel pellets, is used to assist regulation of the long term reactivity of the core,[11] while the control rods are used for rapid changes to the reactor power (e.g. shutdown and start up). Operators of BWRs use the coolant flow through the core to control reactivity by varying the speed of the reactor recirculation pumps (an increase in coolant flow through the core improves the removal of steam bubbles, thus increasing the density of the coolant/moderator with the result of increasing power).

Safety[edit]

In most reactor designs, as a safety measure, control rods are attached to the lifting machinery by electromagnets, rather than direct mechanical linkage. This means that automatically in the event of power failure, or if manually invoked due to failure of the lifting machinery, the control rods will fall, under gravity, fully into the pile to stop the reaction. A notable exception to this fail-safe mode of operation is the BWR which requires the hydraulical insertion of control rods in the event of an emergency shut-down, using water from a special tank that is under high nitrogen pressure. Quickly shutting down a reactor in this way is called scramming the reactor.

Criticality accident prevention[edit]

Mismanagement or control rod failure was often the cause or aggravating factor for nuclear accidents, including the SL-1 explosion and the Chernobyl disaster.

The absorption cross section for 10B (top) and 11B (bottom) as a function of energy

Homogeneous neutron absorbers have often been used to manage criticality accidents which involve aqueous solutions of fissile metals. In several such accidents, either borax (sodium borate) or a cadmium compound has been added to the system. The cadmium can be added as a metal to nitric acid solutions of fissile material; the corrosion of the cadmium in the acid will then generate cadmium nitrate in situ.

In carbon dioxide-cooled reactors such as the AGR, if the solid control rods were to fail to arrest the nuclear reaction, nitrogen gas can be injected into the primary coolant cycle. This is because nitrogen has a larger absorption cross-section for neutrons than carbon or oxygen; hence, the core would then become less reactive.

As the neutron energy increases, the neutron cross section of most isotopes decreases. The boron isotope 10B is responsible for the majority of the neutron absorption. Boron-containing materials can be used as neutron shields to reduce the activation of objects close to a reactor core.

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/sigma/%7Cytterbium (n.gamma) datas with Japanese or Russian database
  2. ^ Harvey M. Buck, Mark A. Cooper, Petr Cerny, Joel D. Grice, Frank C. Hawthorne: Xenotime-(Yb), YbPO4,a new mineral species from the Shatford Lake pegmatite group, southeastern Manitoba, Canada. In: Canadian Mineralogist. 1999, 37, S. 1303–1306 (Abstract in American Mineralogist, S. 1324; PDF; 81 kB).
  3. ^ A. V. Voloshin, Ya. A. Pakhomovsky, F. N. Tyusheva: Keiviite Yb2Si2O7, a new ytterbium silicate from amazonitic pegmatites of the Kola Peninsula. In: Mineralog. Zhurnal. 1983, 5-5, S. 94–99 (Abstract in American Mineralogist, S. 1191; PDF; 853 kB).
  4. ^ "Control Materials". Web.mit.edu. Retrieved 2010-08-14. 
  5. ^ "Hafnium alloys as neutron absorbers". Free Patents Online. Retrieved September 25, 2008. 
  6. ^ "Dysprosium (Z=66)". Everything-Science.com web forum. Retrieved September 25, 2008. 
  7. ^ "Method for making neutron absorber material". Free Patents Online. Retrieved September 25, 2008. 
  8. ^ "Infrarotabsorbierende Druckfarben - Dokument DE102008049595A1". Patent-de.com. 2008-09-30. Retrieved 2014-04-22. 
  9. ^ "Sigma Plots". Nndc.bnl.gov. Retrieved 2014-04-22. 
  10. ^ "Sigma Periodic Table Browse". Nndc.bnl.gov. 2007-01-25. Retrieved 2014-04-22. 
  11. ^ "Enriched boric acid for pressurized water reactors" (PDF). EaglePicher Corporation. Retrieved September 25, 2008. [dead link]

External links[edit]