Planck's law

Not to be confused with Planck's relation.

See also: Black body radiation and Thermal radiation

Planck's law (colored curves) accurately described black body radiation, by proposing that electromagnetic radiation was emitted in quanta. It successfully resolved the ultraviolet catastrophe (black curve), a major problem of classical physics, and is one of the pioneer results that gave birth to quantum mechanics.

In physics, Planck's law describes the amount of electromagnetic energy with a certain wavelength radiated by a black body in thermal equilibrium (i.e. the spectral radiance of a black body). The law is named after Max Planck, who originally proposed it in 1900. The law was the first to accurately describe black body radiation, and resolved the ultraviolet catastrophe. It is a pioneer result of modern physics and quantum theory.

In terms of frequency ($\nu$) or wavelength (λ), Planck's law is written:

$B_\nu(T) = \frac{ 2 h \nu^{3}}{c^2} \frac{1}{e^\frac{h\nu}{k_\mathrm{B}T} - 1},$ $\text{ or }\,$ $B_\lambda(T) =\frac{2 hc^2}{\lambda^5}\frac{1}{ e^{\frac{hc}{\lambda k_\mathrm{B}T}} - 1}$

where B is the spectral radiance, T is the absolute temperature of the black body, k_B is the Boltzmann constant, h is the Planck constant, and c is the speed of light. However these are not the only ways to express the law; expressing it in terms of wavenumber rather than frequency or wavelength is also common, as are expression in terms of the number of photons emitted at a certain wavelength, rather than energy emitted. In the limit of low frequencies (i.e. long wavelengths), Planck's law becomes the Rayleigh–Jeans law, while in the limit of high frequencies (i.e. small wavelengths) it tends to the Wien approximation.

Max Planck developed the law in 1900, originally with only empirically determined constants, and later showed that, expressed as an energy distribution, it is the unique stable distribution for radiation in thermodynamic equilibrium. As an energy distribution, it is one of a family of thermal equilibrium distributions which include the Bose–Einstein distribution, the Fermi–Dirac distribution and the Maxwell–Boltzmann distribution.

Different forms

Planck's law can be encountered in several forms depending on the conventions and preferences of different scientific fields. The various forms of the law for spectral radiance are summarized in the table below. Forms on the left are most often encountered in experimental fields, while those on the right are most often encountered in theoretical fields.

Planck's law expressed in terms of different variables

with h		with ħ
variable	distribution	variable	distribution
Frequency $\nu$	$B_\nu(T) =\frac{ 2 h\nu^{3}}{c^2} \frac{1}{e^{h\nu/(k_\mathrm{B}T)} - 1}$	Angular frequency $\omega$	$B_\omega(T) =\frac{ \hbar\omega^{3}}{4 \pi^3 c^2} \frac{1}{ e^{\hbar \omega/(k_\mathrm{B}T)} - 1 }$
Wavelength $\lambda$	$B_\lambda(T) =\frac{2 hc^2}{\lambda^5} \frac{1}{e^{h c/(\lambda k_\mathrm{B}T)} - 1}$	Angular wavelength $y$	$B_y(T) =\frac{\hbar c^2}{4 \pi^3 y^5} \frac{1}{e^{\hbar c/(y k_\mathrm{B}T)}- 1}$
Wavenumber $\tilde{\nu}$	$B_\tilde{\nu}(T) =2 hc^2\tilde{\nu}^3 \frac{1}{e^{hc\tilde{\nu}/(k_\mathrm{B}T)} - 1 }$	Angular wavenumber $k$	$B_k(T) = \frac{\hbar c^2 k^3}{4 \pi^3} \frac{1}{e^{\hbar c k/(k_\mathrm{B}T)} -1}$

These distributions represent the spectral radiance of blackbodies—the power emitted from the emitting surface, per unit projected area of emitting surface, per unit solid angle, per spectral unit (frequency, wavelength, wavenumber or their angular equivalents). Since the radiance is isotropic (i.e. independent of direction), the power emitted at an angle to the normal is proportional to the projected area, and therefore to the cosine of that angle as per Lambert's cosine law, and is unpolarized.

The relation between the spectral radiance expressed in terms of two different variables i and j with a one-to-one relationship (frequency and wavelength, for example) is given by the chain rule of calculus, with the added assumption that the energy from any bandwidth is a positive number:

$B_i(T) = B_j(T)\left|{\frac{dj}{di}}\right|$

This means that the energy from an infinitesimal bandwidth di is equal to the energy from the corresponding infinitesimal bandwidth dj. This has two main implications. The first is that, in general, one may not convert between the various forms of Planck's law simply by substituting one variable for another. The second that the peak of the distributions depends on which variable is chosen for the expression of Planck's law.

Planck's law can also be written in terms of the spectral energy density (u) by multiplying B by 4π/c:

$u_i(T) = \frac{4\pi}{c} B_i(T)$

These distributions have units of energy per volume per spectral unit.

Properties

Peaks

The distributions $B_\nu, B_\omega, B_\tilde{\nu}$ and $B_k$ peak at

$E = \left[ 3 + W \left(\frac{-3}{e^3} \right) \right] k_\mathrm{B}T \approx 2.821\ k_\mathrm{B}T,$

where W is the Lambert W function.

The distributions $B_\lambda$ and $B_y$ however, peak at a different energy

$E = \left[ 5 + W \left(\frac{-5}{e^5} \right) \right] k_\mathrm{B}T \approx 4.965\ k_\mathrm{B}T,$

The reason for this is that, as mentioned above, one cannot go from (for example) $B_\nu$ to $B_\lambda$ simply by substituting $\nu$ by $\lambda$. In addition, one must also multiply the result of the substitution by $\left | \frac{d\nu}{d\lambda} \right| = c/\lambda^2$. This $1/\lambda^2$ factor shifts the peak of the distribution to higher energies.

Approximations

Log-log plots of radiance vs. frequency for Planck's law (green), compared with the Rayleigh–Jeans law (red) and the Wien approximation (blue) for a black body at 8 mK temperature.

In the limit of low frequencies (i.e. long wavelengths), Planck's law becomes the Rayleigh–Jeans law

$B_\nu(T) \approx \frac{2 \nu^2 }{c^2}\,k_\mathrm{B} T$     or     $\qquad B_\lambda(T) \approx \frac{2c}{\lambda^4}\,k_\mathrm{B} T$

The radiance increases as the square of the frequency, illustrating the ultraviolet catastrophe. In the limit of high frequencies (i.e. small wavelengths) Planck's law tends to the Wien approximation:

$B_\nu(T) \approx \frac{2 h \nu^3}{c^2}\,e^{-\frac{h \nu}{k_\mathrm{B}T}}$     or     $B_\lambda(T) \approx \frac{2 h c^2}{\lambda^5}\,e^{-\frac{hc}{\lambda k_\mathrm{B} T}}$

Both approximations were known to Planck before he developed his law. He was led by these two approximations to develop a law which incorporated both limits, which ultimately became Planck's law.

Percentiles

The Sun is an excellent approximation of a black body. Its effective temperature is ~5,777 K.

Wien's displacement law in its stronger form states that the shape of Planck's law is independent of temperature. It is therefore possible to list the percentile points of the total radiation as well as the peaks for wavelength and frequency, in a form which gives the wavelength λ when divided by temperature T. The second row of the following table lists the corresponding values of λT, that is, those values of x for which the wavelength λ is x/T micrometers at the radiance percentile point given by the corresponding entry in the first row.

Percentile	0.01%	0.1%	1%	10%	20%	25.0%	30%	40%	41.8%	50%	60%	64.6%	70%	80%	90%	99%	99.9%	99.99%
λT (μm·K)	910	1110	1448	2195	2676	2898	3119	3582	3670	4107	4745	5099	5590	6864	9376	22884	51613	113374

That is, 0.01% of the radiation is at a wavelength below 910/T µm, 20% below 2676/T µm, etc. The wavelength and frequency peaks are in bold and occur at 25.0% and 64.6% respectively. The 41.8% point is the wavelength-frequency-neutral peak. These are the points at which the respective Planck-law functions 1/λ⁵, $\nu^3$, and $\nu^2/\lambda^2$ divided by exp(hν/k_BT) − 1 attain their maxima. Also note the much smaller gap in ratio of wavelengths between 0.1% and 0.01% (1110 is 22% more than 910) than between 99.9% and 99.99% (113374 is 120% more than 51613), reflecting the exponential decay of energy at short wavelengths (left end) and polynomial decay at long.

Which peak to use depends on the application. The conventional choice is the wavelength peak at 25.0% given by Wien's displacement law in its weak form. For some purposes the median or 50% point dividing the total radiation into two halves may be more suitable. The latter is closer to the frequency peak than to the wavelength peak because the radiance drops exponentially at short wavelengths and only polynomially at long. The neutral peak occurs at a shorter wavelength than the median for the same reason.

For the Sun, T is 5778 K, allowing the percentile points of the Sun's radiation, in nanometers, to be tabulated as follows when modeled as a black body radiator, to which the Sun is a fair approximation. For comparison a planet modeled as a black body radiating at a nominal 288 K (15 °C) as a representative value of the Earth's highly variable temperature has wavelengths more than twenty times that of the Sun, tabulated in the third row in micrometers (thousands of nanometers).

Percentile	0.01%	0.1%	1%	10%	20%	25.0%	30%	40%	41.8%	50%	60%	64.6%	70%	80%	90%	99%	99.9%	99.99%
Sun λ (nm)	157	192	251	380	463	502	540	620	635	711	821	882	967	1188	1623	3961	8933	19620
288 K planet λ (µm)	3.16	3.85	5.03	7.62	9.29	10.1	10.8	12.4	12.7	14.3	16.5	17.7	19.4	23.8	32.6	79.5	179	394

That is, only 1% of the Sun's radiation is at wavelengths shorter than 251 nm, and only 1% at longer than 3961 nm. Expressed in micrometers this puts 98% of the Sun's radiation in the range from 0.251 to 3.961 µm. The corresponding 98% of energy radiated from a 288 K planet is from 5.03 to 79.5 µm, well above the range of solar radiation (or below if expressed in terms of frequencies $\nu=c\lambda$ instead of wavelengths λ).

A consequence of this more-than-order-of-magnitude difference in wavelength between solar and planetary radiation is that filters designed to pass one and block the other are easy to construct. For example windows fabricated of ordinary glass or transparent plastic pass at least 80% of the incoming 5778 K solar radiation, which is below 1.2 µm in wavelength, while blocking over 99% of the outgoing 288 K thermal radiation from 5 µm upwards, wavelengths at which most kinds of glass and plastic of construction-grade thickness are effectively opaque.

The Sun's radiation is that arriving at the top of the atmosphere (TOA). As can be read from the table, radiation below 400 nm, or ultraviolet, is about 12%, while that above 700 nm, or infrared, starts at about the 49% point and so accounts for 51% of the total. Hence only 37% of the TOA insolation is visible to the human eye. The atmosphere shifts these percentages substantially in favor of visible light as it absorbs most of the ultraviolet and significant amounts of infrared.

Derivation

The following derivation of Planck's law can be found in Brehm & Mullin 1989.

See also: Gas in a box

Consider a cube of side L with conducting walls filled with electromagnetic radiation in thermal equilibrium at temperature T. If there is a small hole in one of the walls, the radiation emitted from the hole will be characteristic of a perfect black body. We will first calculate the spectral energy density within the cavity and then determine the spectral radiance of the emitted radiation.

At the walls of the cube, the parallel component of the electric field and the orthogonal component of the magnetic field must vanish. Analogous to the wave function of a particle in a box, one finds that the fields are superpositions of periodic functions. The three wavelengths λ₁, λ₂, and λ₃, in the three directions orthogonal to the walls can be:

$\lambda_i = \frac{2L}{n_{i}},$

where the n_i are integers. For each set of integers n_i there are two linear independent solutions (modes). According to quantum theory, the energy levels of a mode are given by:

$E_{n_1,n_2,n_3}\left(r\right)=\left(r+\frac{1}{2}\right)\frac{hc}{2L}\sqrt{n_1^2 + n_2^2 + n_3^2}. \qquad \text{(1)}$

The quantum number r can be interpreted as the number of photons in the mode. The two modes for each set of n_i correspond to the two polarization states of the photon which has a spin of 1. Note that for r = 0 the energy of the mode is not zero. This vacuum energy of the electromagnetic field is responsible for the Casimir effect. In the following we will calculate the internal energy of the box at absolute temperature T.

According to statistical mechanics, the probability distribution over the energy levels of a particular mode is given by:

$P_r =\frac{\exp\left(-\beta E\left(r\right)\right)}{Z\left(\beta\right)}.$

Here

$\beta\ \stackrel{\mathrm{def}}{=}\ 1/\left(kT\right).$

The denominator Z(β), is the partition function of a single mode and makes P_r properly normalized:

$Z\left(\beta\right)=\sum_{r=0}^{\infty} e^{-\beta E\left(r\right)}=\frac{1}{1-e^{-\beta\varepsilon}}.$

Here we have implicitly defined

$\varepsilon\ \stackrel{\mathrm{def}}{=}\ \frac{hc}{2L}\sqrt{n_{1}^{2}+n_{2}^{2}+n_{3}^{2}},$

which is the energy of a single photon. As explained here, the average energy in a mode can be expressed in terms of the partition function:

$\left\langle E\right\rangle=-\frac{d\log\left(Z\right)}{d\beta}=\frac{\varepsilon}{e^{\beta\varepsilon}-1}.$

This formula is a special case of the general formula for particles obeying Bose–Einstein statistics. Since there is no restriction on the total number of photons, the chemical potential is zero.

The total energy in the box now follows by summing $\scriptstyle{\left\langle E\right\rangle}$ over all allowed single photon states. This can be done exactly in the thermodynamic limit as L approaches infinity. In this limit, ε becomes continuous and we can then integrate $\scriptstyle{\left\langle E\right\rangle}$ over this parameter. To calculate the energy in the box in this way, we need to evaluate how many photon states there are in a given energy range. If we write the total number of single photon states with energies between ε and ε + dε as g(ε)dε, where g(ε) is the density of states which we'll evaluate in a moment, then we can write:

$U = \int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{\varepsilon}{e^{\beta\varepsilon}-1}g(\varepsilon)\,d\varepsilon. \qquad \mbox{(2)}$

To calculate the density of states we rewrite equation (1) as follows:

$\varepsilon\ \stackrel{\mathrm{def}}{=}\ \frac{hc}{2L}n,$

where n is the norm of the vector n = (n₁, n₂, n₃):

$n=\sqrt{n_{1}^{2}+n_{2}^{2}+n_{3}^{2}}.$

For every vector n with integer components larger than or equal to zero, there are two photon states. This means that the number of photon states in a certain region of n-space is twice the volume of that region. An energy range of dε corresponds to shell of thickness dn = (2L/hc)dε in n-space. Because the components of n have to be positive, this shell spans an octant of a sphere. The number of photon states g(ε)dε, in an energy range dε, is thus given by:

$g(\varepsilon)\,d\varepsilon=2\frac{1}{8}4\pi n^{2}\,dn=\frac{8\pi L^{3}}{h^{3}c^{3}}\varepsilon^{2}\,d\varepsilon.$

Inserting this in Eq. (2) gives:

$U =L^3 \frac{8\pi}{h^3 c^3}\int_0^\infty \frac{\varepsilon^3}{e^{\beta\varepsilon}-1}\,d\varepsilon. \qquad \text{(3)}$

From this equation one easily derives the spectral energy density as a function of frequency $u_\nu(T)$ and as a function of wavelength u_λ(T):

$\frac{U}{L^3} = \int_0^\infty u_\nu(T)\, d\nu,$

where:

$u_\nu(T) = {8\pi h\nu^3\over c^3}{1\over e^{h\nu/k_\mathrm{B}T} - 1}.$

And:

$\frac{U}{L^3} = \int_0^\infty u_\lambda(T)\, d\lambda,$

where

$u_\lambda(T) = {8\pi h c\over \lambda^5}{1\over e^{h c/\lambda k_\mathrm{B}T} - 1}.$

This is also a spectral energy density function with units of energy per unit wavelength per unit volume. Integrals of this type for Bose and Fermi gases can be expressed in terms of polylogarithms. In this case, however, it is possible to calculate the integral in closed form using only elementary functions. Substituting

$\varepsilon = k_\mathrm{B}Tx,$

in Eq. (3), makes the integration variable dimensionless giving:

$u(T) =\frac{8\pi (k_\mathrm{B}T)^{4}}{(hc)^{3}} J,$

where J is a Bose–Einstein integral given by:

$J=\int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{x^{3}}{e^x - 1}\,dx = \frac{\pi^{4}}{15}.$

The total electromagnetic energy inside the box is thus given by:

${U\over V} = \frac{8\pi^5(k_\mathrm{B}T)^4}{15 (hc)^3},$

where V = L³ is the volume of the box.

This is not the Stefan–Boltzmann law (which provides the total energy radiated by a black body per unit surface area per unit time), but it can be written more compactly using the Stefan–Boltzmann constant σ, giving

${U\over V} = \frac{4 \sigma T^4}{c}$

The constant 4σ/c is sometimes called the radiation constant.

Since the radiation is the same in all directions, and propagates at the speed of light (c), the spectral radiance of radiation exiting the small hole is

$B_\nu(T) = \frac{u_\nu(T)\,c}{4\pi},$

which yields

$B_\nu(T) = \frac{2 h\nu^3 }{c^2}~\frac{1}{e^{h\nu/k_\mathrm{B}T}-1}.$

It can be converted to an expression for B_λ(T) in wavelength units by substituting $\nu$ by c/λ and evaluating

$B_\lambda(T) = B_\nu(T)\left|\frac{d\nu}{d\lambda}\right|.$

Note that dimensional analysis shows that the unit of steradians, shown in the denominator of left hand side of the equation above, is generated in and carried through the derivation but does not appear in any of the dimensions for any element on the left-hand-side of the equation.

Physics

The essential nature of black body (or Planckian) radiation is that it is the radiation resulting from thermal equilibrium. Thermal equilibrium is characterized by the absence of any net flow of energy. Just as a material body is characterized by a particular temperature and energy distribution (e.g. the Boltzmann distribution) when it is in thermal equilibrium, so too, the electromagnetic field may be thought of as a photon gas, characterized by a particular temperature and energy distribution (expressed by Planck's law) when it is in thermal equilibrium.

Kirchhoff's law

Main article: Kirchhoff's law of thermal radiation

If there is a material body in thermal equilibrium with the radiation field, then the radiation power falling upon a small area element of that body must be equal to the amount of radiation power leaving that element. There are two ways that radiation may leave such an area element – reflection or scattering and emission. This assumes that the material body is large enough to be opaque – there is no radiation leaving the element that has been transmitted through the body. At a particular frequency, the power directed into the area element at equilibrium will be equal to the equilibrium distribution $B_\nu$ (without necessarily specifying what that distribution is). Defining $\alpha$ as the fraction of incident radiation absorbed at the surface, the rate at which this energy is absorbed will be $\alpha B_\nu$. By conservation of energy, the rest must be reflected or scattered, which will be proportional to $(1-\alpha) B_\nu$. The area element will also emit its own thermal radiation which may be expressed as a proportion of the equilibrium radiation: $\varepsilon B_\nu$, where $\varepsilon$ is the emissivity of the surface. Since, at equilibrium, the rate of energy arriving must equal the rate leaving, it follows that:

$B_\nu = (1-\alpha)B_\nu+\varepsilon B_\nu \,$

or, equivalently $\alpha=\varepsilon$, which is just Kirchhoff's law applied to that surface element.^{[citation needed]} It is generally true that the emissivity and absorptivity are properties of the material only, so that this equivalence will hold even when the radiation field is not thermal radiation. Kirchhoff's law also implies that the equilibrium distribution is unique, and Planck's contribution was to determine the expression of that equilibrium distribution.

Black body

Main article: Black body

A black body completely absorbs all of the electromagnetic radiation falling upon it (hence the term "black"). This means that $\alpha=1$, and by Kirchhoff's law, the emissivity will be unity as well, so that the thermal radiation from a black body is always equal to the full amount specified by Planck's law. In addition, it follows that no other body can emit thermal radiation that exceeds that of a black body, since if it were in equilibrium with a radiation field, it would be emitting more energy than was incident upon it.

Though perfectly black materials do not exist, in practice a black surface can be accurately approximated. As to its material interior, a body is completely black to a certain wavelength if it is completely opaque to that wavelength; that means that it absorbs all of the wavelength that penetrates the interface to enter the body; this is not too difficult to achieve in practice. On the other hand, a perfectly black interface is not found in nature. The best practical way to make an effectively black interface is to simulate an 'interface' by use of a small hole in the wall of a large cavity in a completely opaque body, with a controlled temperature. Radiation entering the hole has almost no possibility of escaping the cavity without being absorbed by multiple impacts with its walls.

Lambert's cosine law

Main article: Lambert's cosine law

As explained by Planck, a radiating body has an interior consisting of matter, and an interface with its contiguous neighbouring material medium, which is usually the medium from within which the radiation from the surface of the body is observed. The interface is not composed of physical matter but is a theoretical conception, a mathematical two-dimensional surface, a joint property of the two contiguous media, strictly speaking belonging to neither separately. Such an interface can neither absorb nor emit, because it is not composed of physical matter; but it is the site of reflection and transmission of radiation, because it is a surface of discontinuity of optical properties. The reflection and transmission of radiation at the interface obey the Stokes–Helmholtz reciprocity principle.

At any point in the interior of a black body located inside a cavity in thermodynamic equilibrium at temperature $T$ the radiation is homogeneous, isotropic and unpolarized. A black body absorbs all and reflects none of the electromagnetic radiation incident upon it. According to the Helmholtz reciprocity principle, radiation from the interior of a black body is not reflected at its surface, but is fully transmitted to its exterior. Because of the isotropy of the radiation in the body's interior, the spectral radiance of radiation transmitted from its interior to its exterior through its surface is independent of direction.

This is expressed by saying that radiation from the surface of a black body in thermodynamic equilibrium obeys Lambert's cosine law. This means that the spectral flux Φ(dA, θ, Ω, ν) from a given infinitesimal element of area $\mathrm{d}A$ of the emitting surface of the black body, measured from a given direction that makes an angle θ with the normal to the surface at dA, per unit solid angle of detection $\Omega$, can be represented as

$\frac{\mathrm{d} \Phi(\mathrm{d}A,\theta,\Omega,\nu)}{\mathrm{d}{\Omega}}= L^0(\mathrm{d}A,\nu)\,\mathrm{d}A\, \cos \theta$

where L⁰(dA, ν) denotes the spectral radiance that area dA would show if it were measured in its normal direction. For this equality, one is temporarily disregarding the fact that because the body is black the spectral radiance within it is the same in every direction.

But now taking into account the independence of direction of the spectral radiance of radiation from the surface of a black body in thermodynamic equilibrium, one has L⁰(dA, ν) = B_ν (T) and so

$\frac{\mathrm{d} \Phi(\mathrm{d}A,\theta,\Omega,\nu)}{\mathrm{d}{\Omega}}= B_{\nu}(T)\,\mathrm{d}A\,\cos\theta$ .

This expresses the independence of direction of the spectral radiance B_ν (T) of the surface of a black body in thermodynamic equilibrium.

Stefan–Boltzmann Law

Main article: Stefan-Boltzmann law

The total power emitted per unit area at the surface of a black body (P) may be found by integrating the black body spectral flux found from Lambert's law over all frequencies, and over the solid angles corresponding to a hemisphere (h) above the surface.

$P=\int_0^\infty d\nu \int_h d\Omega\,B_\nu \cos(\theta)$

The infinitesimal solid angle can be expressed in spherical polar coordinates:

$d\Omega=\sin(\theta)\,d\theta\,d\phi$

So that:

$P=\int_0^\infty d\nu \int_0^{\pi/2} d\theta \int_0^{2\pi}d\phi \, B_\nu(T) \cos(\theta)\sin(\theta)=\sigma\,T^4$

where

$\sigma=\frac{2k^4\pi^5}{15c^2h^3}\approx 5.670 400 \times 10^{-8}\, \mathrm{J\, s^{-1}m^{-2}K^{-4}}$

is known as the Stefan–Boltzmann constant.

Radiative transfer

Main article: Radiative transfer

The equation of radiative transfer describes the way in which radiation is affected as it travels through a material medium. For the special case in which the material medium is in thermodynamic equilibrium in the neighborhood of a point in the medium, Planck's law is of special importance.

For simplicity, we can consider the linear steady state, without scattering. The equation of radiative transfer states that for a beam of light going through a small distance ds, energy is conserved: The change in the (spectral) radiance of that beam ($I_\nu$) is equal to the amount removed by the material medium plus the amount gained from the material medium. If the radiation field is in equilibrium with the material medium, these two contributions will be equal. The material medium will have a certain emission coefficient and absorption coefficient.

The absorption coefficient $\alpha$ is the fractional change in the intensity of the light beam as it travels the distance ds, and has units of 1/length. It is composed of two parts, the decrease due to absorption and the increase due to stimulated emission. Stimulated emission is emission by the material body which is caused by and is proportional to the incoming radiation. It is included in the absorption term because, like absorption, it is proportional to the intensity of the incoming radiation. Since the amount of absorption will generally vary linearly as the density $\rho$ of the material, we may define a "mass absorption coefficient" $\kappa_\nu=\alpha/\rho$ which is a property of the material itself. The change in intensity of a light beam due to absorption as it traverses a small distance ds will then be $dI_\nu=-\kappa_\nu\,\rho\,I_\nu\,ds$

The "mass emission coefficient" $j_\nu$ is equal to the radiance per unit volume of a small volume element divided by its mass (since, as for the mass absorption coefficient, the emission is proportional to the emitting mass) and has units of power/solid angle/frequency/density. Like the mass absorption coefficient, it too is a property of the material itself. The change in a light beam as it traverses a small distance ds will then be $dI_\nu=j_\nu\,\rho\,ds$

The equation of radiative transfer will then be the sum of these two contributions:

$\frac{dI_\nu}{ds}=j_\nu\rho-k_\nu\rho I_\nu$

If the radiation field is in equilibrium with the material medium, then the radiation will be homogeneous (independent of position) so that $dI_\nu=0$ and:

$k_\nu B_\nu = j_\nu\,$

which is another statement of Kirchhoff's law, relating two material properties of the medium, and which yields the radiative transfer equation at a point around which the medium is in thermodynamic equilibrium:

$\frac{dI_\nu}{ds}=k_\nu\rho(B_\nu-I_\nu)$

Einstein coefficients

Main article: Atomic spectral line

The principle of detailed balance states that, at thermodynamic equilibrium, each elementary process is equilibrated by its reverse process.

In 1916, Albert Einstein applied this principle on an atomic level to the case of an atom radiating and absorbing radiation due to transitions between two particular energy levels, giving a deeper insight into the equation of radiative transfer and Kirchhoff's law for this type of radiation. If level 1 is the lower energy level with energy $E_1$, and level 2 is the upper energy level with energy $E_2$, then the frequency $\nu$ of the radiation radiated or absorbed will be determined by Bohr's frequency condition: $E_2-E_1=h\nu$.

If $n_1$ and $n_2$ are the number densities of the atom in states 1 and 2 respectively, then the rate of change of these densities in time will be due to three processes:

$\left(\frac{dn_1}{dt}\right)_{spon}=A_{21} n_2$	Spontaneous emission
$\left(\frac{dn_1}{dt}\right)_{stim}=B_{21} n_2 I_\nu(T)$	Stimulated emission
$\left(\frac{dn_2}{dt}\right)_{abs}=B_{12} n_1 I_\nu(T)$	Photo-absorption

where $I_\nu(T)$ is the spectral radiance of the radiation field. The three parameters $A_{12}$, $B_{21}$ and $B_{12}$, known as the Einstein coefficients, are associated with the photon frequency $(\nu)$ produced by the transition between two energy levels (states). As a result, each line in a spectra has it own set of associated coefficients. When the atoms and the radiation field are in equilibrium, the radiance will be given by Planck's law and, by the principle of detailed balance, the sum of these rates must be zero:

$0=A_{21}n_2+B_{21}n_2 B_\nu(T)-B_{12}n_1 B_\nu(T)\,$

Since the atoms are also in equilibrium, the populations of the two levels are related by the Boltzmann distribution:

$\frac{n_2}{n_1}=\frac{g_2}{g_1} e^{-h\nu/k_B T}$

where $g_1$ and $g_2$ are the multiplicities of the respective energy levels. Combining the above two equations with the requirement that they be valid at any temperature yields two relationships between the Einstein coefficients:

$\frac{A_{21}}{B_{21}}=\frac{2h\nu^3}{c^2}$

$\frac{B_{21}}{B_{12}}=\frac{g_1}{g_2}$

so that knowledge of one coefficient will yield the other two. For the case of isotropic absorption and emission, the emission coefficient ($j_\nu$) and absorption coefficient ($\kappa_\nu\,$) defined in the radiative transfer section above, can be expressed in terms of the Einstein coefficients. The relationships between the Einstein coefficients will yield the expression of Kirchhoff's law expressed in that section, namely that

$j_\nu=\kappa_\nu B_\nu\,$

These coefficients apply to both atoms and molecules.

Limitations of Planck's Law

Planck's formula predicts that a black body will radiate energy at all frequencies, but its intensity rapidly tends to zero at both high and low frequencies (short and long wavelengths). For example, a black body at room temperature (300 K) with one square meter of surface area will emit a photon in the visible range once every minute or so, meaning that for most practical purposes a black body at room temperature does not emit in the visible range.^{[citation needed]}

History

Forerunners

Balfour Stewart

In 1858, Balfour Stewart described his experiments on the thermal radiative emissive and absorptive powers of polished plates of various substances, compared with the powers of lamp-black surfaces, at the same temperature. Stewart chose lamp-black surfaces as his reference because of various previous experimental findings, especially those of Pierre Prevost and of John Leslie. He wrote "Lamp-black, which absorbs all the rays that fall upon it, and therefore possesses the greatest possible absorbing power, will possess also the greatest possible radiating power." More an experimenter than a logician, Stewart failed to point out that his statement presupposed an abstract general principle, that there exist either ideally in theory or really in nature bodies or surfaces that respectively have one and the same unique universal greatest possible absorbing power, likewise for radiating power, for every wavelength and equilibrium temperature.

Stewart measured radiated power with a thermo-pile and sensitive galvanometer read with a microscope. He was concerned with selective thermal radiation, which he investigated with plates of substances that radiated and absorbed selectively for different qualities of radiation rather than maximally for all qualities of radiation. He discussed the experiments in terms of rays which could be reflected and refracted, and which obeyed the Stokes-Helmholtz reciprocity principle (though he did not use an eponym for it). He did not in this paper mention that the qualities of the rays might be described by their wavelengths, nor did he use spectrally resolving apparatus such as prisms or diffraction gratings. His work was quantitative within these constraints. He made his measurements in a room temperature environment, and quickly so as to catch his bodies in a condition near the thermal equilibrium in which they had been prepared by heating to equilibrium with boiling water. His measurements confirmed that substances that emit and absorb selectively respect the principle of selective equality of emission and absorption at thermal equilibrium.

Stewart offered a theoretical proof that this should be the case separately for every selected quality of thermal radiation, but his mathematics was not rigorously valid. He made no mention of thermodynamics in this paper, though he did refer to conservation of vis viva. He proposed that his measurements implied that radiation was both absorbed and emitted by particles of matter throughout depths of the media in which it propagated. He applied the Helmholtz reciprocity principle to account for the material interface processes as distinct from the processes in the interior material. He did not postulate unrealizable perfectly black surfaces. He concluded that his experiments showed that in a cavity in thermal equilibrium, the heat radiated from any part of the interior bounding surface, no matter of what material it might be composed, was the same as would have been emitted from a surface of the same shape and position that would have been composed of lamp-black. He did not state explicitly that the lamp-black-coated bodies that he used as reference must have had a unique common spectral emittance function that depended on temperature in a unique way.

Gustav Kirchhoff

In 1859, not knowing of Stewart's work, Gustav Robert Kirchhoff reported the coincidence of the wavelengths of spectrally resolved lines of absorption and of emission of visible light.

Kirchhoff then went on to consider bodies that emit and absorb heat radiation, in an opaque enclosure or cavity, in equilibrium at temperature T.

Here is used a notation different from Kirchhoff's. Here, the emitting power E(T, i) denotes a dimensioned quantity, the total radiation emitted by a body labeled by index i at temperature T. The total absorption ratio a(T, i) of that body is dimensionless, the ratio of absorbed to incident radiation in the cavity at temperature T . (In contrast with Balfour Stewart's, Kirchhoff's definition of his absorption ratio did not refer in particular to a lamp-black surface as the source of the incident radiation.) Thus the ratio E(T, i) / a(T, i) of emitting power to absorption ratio is a dimensioned quantity, with the dimensions of emitting power, because a(T, i) is dimensionless. Also here the wavelength-specific emitting power of the body at temperature T is denoted by E(λ, T, i) and the wavelength-specific absorption ratio by a(λ, T, i) . Again, the ratio E(λ, T, i) / a(λ, T, i) of emitting power to absorption ratio is a dimensioned quantity, with the dimensions of emitting power.

In a second report made in 1859, Kirchhoff announced a new general principle or law for which he offered a theoretical and mathematical proof, though he did not offer quantitative measurements of radiation powers. His theoretical proof was and still is considered by some writers to be invalid. His principle, however, has endured: it was that for heat rays of the same wavelength, in equilibrium at at a given temperature, the wavelength-specific ratio of emitting power to absorption ratio has one and the same common value for all bodies that emit and absorb at that wavelength. In symbols, the law stated that the wavelength-specific ratio E(λ, T, i) / a(λ, T, i) has one and the same value for all bodies, that is for all values of index i . In this report there was no mention of black bodies.

In 1860, still not knowing of Stewart's measurements for selected qualities of radiation, Kirchhoff pointed out that it was long established experimentally that for total heat radiation, of unselected quality, emitted and absorbed by a body in equilibrium, the dimensioned total radiation ratio E(T, i) / a(T, i), has one and the same value common to all bodies, that is, for every value of the material index i. Again without measurements of radiative powers or other new experimental data, Kirchhoff then offered a fresh theoretical proof of his new principle of the universality of the value of the wavelength-specific ratio E(λ, T, i) / a(λ, T, i) at thermal equilibrium. His fresh theoretical proof was and still is considered by some writers to be invalid.

But more importantly, it relied on a new theoretical postulate of "perfectly black bodies", which is the reason why one speaks of Kirchhoff's law. Such black bodies showed complete absorption in their infinitely thin most superficial surface. They correspond to Balfour Stewart's reference bodies, with internal radiation, coated with lamp-black. They were not the more realistic perfectly black bodies later considered by Planck. Planck's black bodies radiated and absorbed only by the material in their interiors; their interfaces with contiguous media were only mathematical surfaces, capable neither of absorption nor emission, but only of reflecting and transmitting with refraction.

Kirchhoff's proof considered an arbitrary non-ideal body labeled i as well as various perfect black bodies labeled BB . It required that the bodies be kept in a cavity in thermal equilibrium at temperature T . His proof intended to show that the ratio E(λ, T, i) / a(λ, T, i) was independent of the nature i of the non-ideal body, however partly transparent or partly reflective it was.

His proof first argued that for wavelength λ and at temperature T, at thermal equilibrium, all perfectly black bodies of the same size and shape have the one and the same common value of emissive power E(λ, T, BB), with the dimensions of power. His proof noted that the dimensionless wavelength-specific absorption ratio a(λ, T, BB) of a perfectly black body is by definition exactly 1. Then for a perfectly black body, the wavelength-specific ratio of emissive power to absorption ratio E(λ, T, BB) / a(λ, T, BB) is again just E(λ, T, BB), with the dimensions of power. Kirchhoff considered, successively, thermal equilibrium with the arbitrary non-ideal body, and with a perfectly black body of the same size and shape, in place in his cavity in equilibrium at temperature T . He argued that the flows of heat radiation must be the same in each case. Thus he argued that at thermal equilibrium the ratio E(λ, T, i) / a(λ, T, i) was equal to E(λ, T, BB), which may now be denoted B_λ (λ, T), a continuous function, dependent only on λ at fixed temperature T, and an increasing function of T at fixed wavelength λ, at low temperatures vanishing for visible but not for longer wavelengths, with positive values for visible wavelengths at higher temperatures, which does not depend on the nature i of the arbitrary non-ideal body. (Geometrical factors, taken into detailed account by Kirchhoff, have been ignored in the foregoing.)

Thus Kirchhoff's law of thermal radiation can be stated: For any material at all, radiating and absorbing in thermodynamic equilibrium at any given temperature T, for every wavelength λ, the ratio of emissive power to absorptive ratio has one universal value, which is characteristic of a perfect black body, and is an emissive power which we here represent by B_λ (λ, T) . (For our notation B_λ (λ, T), Kirchhoff's original notation was simply e.)

Kirchhoff announced that the determination of the function B_λ (λ, T) was a problem of the highest importance, though he recognized that there would be experimental difficulties to be overcome. He supposed that like other functions that do not depend on the properties of individual bodies, it would be a simple function. That function B_λ (λ, T) has occasionally been called 'Kirchhoff's (emission, universal) function', though its precise mathematical form would not be known for another forty years, till it was discovered by Planck in 1900. The theoretical proof for Kirchhoff's universality principle was worked on and debated by various physicists over the same time, and later. Kirchhoff stated later in 1860 that his theoretical proof was better than Balfour Stewart's, and in some respects it was so. Kirchhoff's 1860 paper did not mention the second law of thermodynamics, and of course did not mention the concept of entropy which had not at that time been established. In a more considered account in a book in 1862, Kirchhoff mentioned the connection of his law with "Carnot's principle".

According to Helge Kragh, "Quantum theory owes its origin to the study of thermal radiation, in particular to the "blackbody" radiation that Robert Kirchhoff had first defined in 1859–1860."

Empirical sources of Planck's law

In 1860, Kirchhoff predicted experimental difficulties for the empirical determination of the function that described the dependence of the black-body spectrum as a function only of temperature and wavelength. And so it turned out. It took some forty years of development of improved methods of measurement of electromagnetic radiation to get a reliable result.

In 1865, John Tyndall described radiation from electrically heated filaments and from carbon arcs as visible and invisible. Tyndall spectrally decomposed the radiation by use of a rock salt prism, which passed heat as well as visible rays, and measured the radiation intensity by means of a thermopile.

In 1880, André-Prosper-Paul Crova published a diagram of the three-dimensional appearance of the graph of the strength of thermal radiation as a function of wavelength and temperature.

In 1898, Otto Lummer and Ferdinand Kurlbaum published an account of their cavity radiation source. Their design has been used largely unchanged for radiation measurements to the present day. It was a platinum box, divided by diaphragms, with its interior blackened with iron oxide. It was an important ingredient for the progressively improved measurements that led to the discovery of Planck's law.

Planck's views just before the empirical facts led him to find his eventual law

Theoretical and empirical progress enabled Lummer and Pringsheim to write in 1899 that available experimental evidence was approximately consistent with the specific intensity law Cλ⁻⁵e^(−c/λT) where C and c denote empirically measurable constants, and where λ and T denote wavelength and temperature respectively. For theoretical reasons, Planck at that time accepted this formulation, which has an effective cut-off of short wavelengths.

Finding the empirical law

Max Planck originally produced his law on 19 October 1900 as an improvement upon the Wien approximation, published in 1896 by Wilhelm Wien, which fit the experimental data at short wavelengths (high frequencies) but deviated from it at long wavelengths (low frequencies). In June 1900, based on heuristic theoretical considerations, Rayleigh had suggested a formula that he proposed might be checked experimentally. The suggestion was that the Stewart–Kirchhoff universal function might be of the form $c_1T\lambda^{-4}\mathrm{exp}(-c_2/\lambda T)$ . This was not the celebrated Rayleigh–Jeans formula $8\pi k_{\mathrm{B}}T\lambda^{-4}$, which did not emerge until 1905, though it did reduce to the latter for long wavelengths, which are the relevant ones here. According to Klein, one may speculate that it is likely that Planck had seen this suggestion though he did not mention it in his papers of 1900 and 1901. Planck would have been aware of various other proposed formulas which had been offered. On 7 October 1900, Rubens told Planck that in the complementary domain (long wavelength, low frequency), and only there, Rayleigh's 1900 formula fitted the observed data well.

For long wavelengths, Rayleigh's 1900 heuristic formula approximately meant that energy was proportional to temperature, U = const. T . It is known that $\mathrm{d}S/\mathrm{d}U=1/T$ and this leads to $\mathrm{d}S/\mathrm{d}U=\mathrm{const.}/ U$ and thence to d²S /dU ² = − const. / U ² for long wavelengths. But for short wavelengths, the Wien formula leads to 1 / T = − const. / ln U + const. and thence to d²S /dU ² = − const. / U for short wavelengths. Planck perhaps patched together these two heuristic formulas, for long and for short wavelengths, to produce a formula

$\mathrm{d}^2 S/\mathrm{d}U^2=\frac{\alpha}{U(\beta+U)}$

This led Planck to the formula

$B_\lambda(T) =\frac{C\lambda^{-5}}{e^{\frac{c}{\lambda T}} - 1},$

where Planck used the symbols $C$ and $c$ to denote empirical fitting constants.

Planck sent this result to Rubens, who compared it with his and Kurlbaum's observational data and found that it fitted for all wavelengths remarkably well. On 19 October 1900, Rubens and Kurlbaum briefly reported the fit to the data, and Planck added a short presentation to give a theoretical sketch to account for his formula. Within a week, Rubens and Kurlbaum gave a fuller report of their measurements confirming Planck's law. Their technique for spectral resolution of the longer wavelength radiation was called the residual ray method. The rays were repeatedly reflected from polished crystal surfaces, and the rays that made it all the way through the process were 'residual', and were of wavelengths preferentially reflected by crystals of suitably specific materials.

Trying to find a physical explanation of the law

Once Planck had discovered the empirically fitting function, he constructed a physical derivation of this law. His thinking revolved around entropy rather than being directly about temperature. Planck's logic started by postulating a universal finite element of hypervolume of statistical phase space. Consequent on this, he considered a cavity with perfectly reflective walls; the cavity contained finitely many hypothetical well separated resonant oscillatory bodies, several such oscillators at each of finitely many characteristic frequencies. The hypothetical oscillators were for Planck purely imaginary theoretical investigative probes, and he said of them that such oscillators do not need to "really exist somewhere in nature, provided their existence and their properties are consistent with the laws of thermodynamics and electrodynamics.". Beyond their occupation of the universal hypervolume elements of statistical phase space, Planck did not attribute any definite physical significance to his hypothesis of resonant oscillators, but rather proposed it as a mathematical device that enabled him to derive a single expression for the black body spectrum that matched the empirical data at all wavelengths. He tentatively mentioned the possible connection of such oscillators with atoms. In a sense, the oscillators corresponded to Planck's speck of carbon; the size of the speck could be small regardless of the size of the cavity, provided the speck effectively transduced energy between radiative wavelength modes.

Partly following a heuristic method of calculation pioneered by Boltzmann for gas molecules, Planck considered the possible ways of distributing electromagnetic energy over the different modes of his hypothetical charged material oscillators, heuristically distributing the energy in arbitrary merely mathematical quanta ϵ, which Boltzmann would have proceeded to make tend to zero in magnitude. Referring to a new universal constant of nature, h, Planck supposed that, in the several oscillators of each of the finitely many characteristic frequencies, the total energy was distributed to each in an integer multiple of a definite physical unit of energy, ϵ, not arbitrary as in Boltzmann's method, but now for Planck characteristic of the respective characteristic frequency. His new universal constant of nature, h, is now known as Planck's constant.

Planck explained further that the respective definite unit, ϵ, of energy should be proportional to the respective characteristic oscillation frequency $\nu$ of the hypothetical oscillator, and in 1901 he expressed this with the constant of proportionality h:

$\epsilon=h\nu$.

This is known as Planck's relation.

Planck did not propose that light propagating in free space is quantized. The idea of quantization of the free electromagnetic field was developed by later, and eventually incorporated into what we now know as quantum field theory.

In 1906 Planck acknowledged that his imaginary resonators, having linear dynamics, did not provide a physical explanation for energy transduction between frequencies. Planck believed that in a cavity with perfectly reflecting walls and with no matter present, the electromagnetic field cannot exchange energy between frequency components. This is because of the linearity of Maxwell's equations (we now know that due to quantum mechanics, the electromagnetic field obeys nonlinear equations and does in fact self-interact ). Planck believed that a field with no interactions neither obeys nor violates the classical principle of equipartition of energy , and instead remains exactly as it was when introduced, rather than evolving into a black body field. Thus, the linearity of his mechanical assumptions precluded Planck from having a mechanical explanation of the maximization of the entropy of the thermodynamic equilibrium thermal radiation field. This is why he had to resort to Boltzmann's probabilistic arguments.

Planck's law may be regarded as fulfulling the prediction of Gustav Kirchhoff that his law of thermal radiation was of the highest importance. In his mature presentation of his own law, Planck offered a thorough and detailed theoretical proof for Kirchhoff's law, theoretical proof of which until then had been sometimes debated, partly because it was said to rely on unphysical theoretical objects, such as Kirchhoff's perfectly absorbing infinitely thin black surface.

Subsequent events

It was not till five years after Planck made his heuristic assumption of abstract elements of energy or of action that Albert Einstein conceived of really existing quanta of light in 1905 as a revolutionary explanation of black-body radiation, of photoluminescence, of the photoelectric effect, and of the ionization of gases by ultraviolet light. In 1905, "Einstein believed that Planck's theory could not be made to agree with the idea of light quanta, a mistake he corrected in 1906." Contrary to Planck's beliefs of the time, Einstein proposed a model and formula whereby light was emitted, absorbed, and propagated in free space in energy quanta localized in points of space. As an introduction to his reasoning, Einstein recapitulated Planck's model of hypothetical resonant material electric oscillators as sources and sinks of radiation, but then he offered a new argument, disconnected from that model, but partly based on a thermodynamic argument of Wien, in which Planck's formula ϵ = $h\nu$ played no role. Einstein gave the energy content of such quanta in the form $R\beta\nu/N$. Thus Einstein was contradicting the undulatory theory of light held by Planck. In 1910, criticizing a manuscript sent to him by Planck, knowing that Planck was a steady supporter of Einstein's theory of special relativity, Einstein wrote to Planck: "To me it seems absurd to have energy continuously distributed in space without assuming an aether."

According to Thomas Kuhn, it was not till 1908 that Planck more or less accepted part of Einstein's arguments for physical as distinct from abstract mathematical discreteness in thermal radiation physics. Still in 1908, considering Einstein's proposal of quantal propagation, Planck opined that such a revolutionary step was perhaps unnecessary. Until then, Planck had been consistent in thinking that discreteness of action quanta was to be found neither in his resonant oscillators nor in the propagation of thermal radiation. Kuhn wrote that, in Planck's earlier papers and in his 1906 monograph, there is no "mention of discontinuity, [nor] of talk of a restriction on oscillator energy, [nor of] any formula like U = nhν." Kuhn pointed out that his study of Planck's papers of 1900 and 1901, and of his monograph of 1906, had led him to "heretical" conclusions, contrary to the widespread assumptions of others who saw Planck's writing only from the perspective of later, anachronistic, viewpoints. Kuhn's conclusions, finding a period till 1908, when Planck consistently held his 'first theory', have been accepted by other historians.

In the second edition of his monograph, in 1912, Planck sustained his dissent from Einstein's proposal of light quanta. He proposed in some detail that absorption of light by his virtual material resonators might be continuous, occurring at a constant rate in equilibrium, as distinct from quantal absorption. Only emission was quantal. This has at times been called Planck's "second theory".

It was not till 1919 that Planck in the third edition of his monograph more or less accepted his 'third theory', that both emission and absorption of light were quantal.

The colourful term "ultraviolet catastrophe" was given by Paul Ehrenfest in 1911 to the paradoxical result that the total energy in the cavity tends to infinity when the equipartition theorem of classical statistical mechanics is (mistakenly) applied to black body radiation. But this had not been part of Planck's thinking, because he had not tried to apply the doctrine of equipartition: when he made his discovery in 1900, he had not noticed any sort of "catastrophe". It was first noted by Lord Rayleigh in 1900, and then in 1901 by Sir James Jeans; and later, in 1905, by Einstein when he wanted to support the idea that light propagates as discrete packets, later called 'photons', and by Rayleigh and by Jeans.

In 1913, Bohr gave another formula with a further different physical meaning to the quantity hν. In contrast to Planck's and Einstein's formulas, Bohr's formula referred explicitly and categorically to energy levels of atoms. Bohr's formula was $W_{\tau_2} - W_{\tau_1}=h\nu$ where $W_{\tau_2}$ and $W_{\tau_1}$ denote the energy levels of quantum states of an atom, with quantum numbers $\tau_2\$ and $\tau_1\$ . The symbol $\nu\$ denotes the frequency of a quantum of radiation that can be emitted or absorbed as the atom passes between those two quantum states. In contrast to Planck's model, the frequency $\nu\$ has no immediate relation to frequencies that might describe those quantum states themselves.

Later, in 1924, Satyendra Nath Bose developed the theory of the statistical mechanics of photons, which allowed a theoretical derivation of Planck's law. The actual word 'photon' was invented still later, by G.N. Lewis in 1926, who mistakenly believed that photons were conserved, contrary to Bose–Einstein statistics; nevertheless the word 'photon' was adopted to express the Einstein postulate of the packet nature of light propagation. In an electromagnetic field isolated in a vacuum in a vessel with perfectly reflective walls, such as was considered by Planck, indeed the photons would be conserved according to Einstein's 1905 model, but Lewis was referring to a field of photons considered as a system closed with respect to ponderable matter but open to exchange of electromagnetic energy with a surrounding system of ponderable matter, and he mistakenly imagined that still the photons were conserved, being stored inside atoms.

Ultimately, Planck's law of black-body radiation contributed to Einstein's concept of quanta of light carrying linear momentum, which became the fundamental basis for the development of quantum mechanics.

The above-mentioned linearity of Planck's mechanical assumptions, not allowing for energetic interactions between frequency components, was superseded in 1925 by Heisenberg's original quantum mechanics. In his paper submitted on 29 July 1925, Heisenberg's theory accounted for Bohr's above-mentioned formula of 1913. It admitted non-linear oscillators as models of atomic quantum states, allowing energetic interaction between their own multiple internal discrete Fourier frequency components, on the occasions of emission or absorption of quanta of radiation. The frequency of a quantum of radiation was that of a definite coupling between internal atomic meta-stable oscillatory quantum states. At that time, Heisenberg knew nothing of matrix albegra, but Max Born read the manuscript of Heisenberg's paper and recognized the matrix character of Heisenberg's theory. Then Born and Jordan published an explicitly matrix theory of quantum mechanics, based on, but in form distinctly different from, Heisenberg's original quantum mechanics; it is the Born and Jordan matrix theory that is today called matrix mechanics.

Nowadays, as a statement of the energy of a light quantum, often one finds the formula E = ħω, where ħ = h/2π, and ω = $2\pi\nu$ denotes angular frequency, and less often the equivalent formula E = $h\nu$. This statement about a really existing and propagating light quantum, based on Einstein's, has a physical meaning different from that of Planck's above statement ϵ = $h\nu$ about the abstract energy units to be distributed amongst his hypothetical resonant material oscillators.

An article by Helge Kragh published in Physics World gives an account of this history.

See also

• Black body
• Radiance
• Sakuma–Hattori equation

References

Bibliography

• Bohr, N. (1913). "On the constitution of atoms and molecules". Philosophical Magazine 26: 1–25. http://www.ffn.ub.es/luisnavarro/nuevo_maletin/Bohr_1913.pdf. 
• Bohren, C. F.; Clothiaux, E. E. (2006). Fundamentals of Atmospheric Radiation. Wiley-VCH. ISBN 3-527-40503-8. 
• Boltzmann, L. (1878). "Über die Beziehung zwischen dem zweiten Hauptsatze der mechanischen Wärmetheorie und der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung, respective den Sätzen über das Wärmegleichgewicht". Sitzungsberichte Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Classe der kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften in Wien 76, Abt. 2: 373–435. 
• Born, M.; Wolf, E. (1999). Principles of Optics (7th ed.). Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0521642221. 
• Born, M.; Jordan, P. (1925). "Zur Quantenmechanik". Zeitschrift für Physik 34: 858–888. Bibcode 1925ZPhy...34..858B. doi:10.1007/BF01328531.  Translated in part as "On quantum mechanics" in van der Waerden, B.L. (1967). Sources of Quantum Mechanics. North-Holland Publishing. pp. 277–306. 
• Brehm, J. J.; Mullins, W. J. (1989). Introduction to the Structure of Matter. Wiley. ISBN 047160531X. 
• Brillouin, L. (1970). Relativity Reexamined. Academic Press. ISBN 978-0121349455. 
• Caniou, J. (1999). Passive Infrared Detection: Theory and Applications. Springer. ISBN 9780792385325. http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=X-aFGcf6pOEC&oi=fnd&pg=116. 
• Chandrasekhar, S. (1960) [1950]. Radiative Transfer (Revised reprint ed.). Dover Publications. ISBN 978-0486605906. 
• Cotton, A. (1899). "The present status of Kirchhoff's law". Astrophysical Journal 9: 237–268, translated from the Revue Générale des Sciences, February 15, 1899. Bibcode 1899ApJ.....9..237C. doi:10.1086/140585. 
• Crova, A.-P.-P. (1880). Étude des radiations émises par les corps incandescents. Mesure optique des hautes températures. Series 5, volume 19. pp. 472–550. http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k34859d/f470.image.r=Annales%20de%20Chimie%20et%20de%20Physique.langEN. 
• Dougal, R. C. (September 1976). "The presentation of the Planck radiation formula (tutorial)". Physics Education 11 (6): 438–443. Bibcode 1976PhyEd..11..438D. doi:10.1088/0031-9120/11/6/008. 
• Ehrenfest, P. (1911). "Welche Züge der Lichtquantenhypothese spielen in der Theorie der Wärmestrahlung eine wesentliche Rolle?". Annalen der Physik 36: 91–118. Bibcode 1911AnP...341...91E. doi:10.1002/andp.19113411106. 
• Ehrenfest, P.; Kamerlingh Onnes, H. (1914). "Simplified deduction of the formula from the theory of combinations which Planck uses as the basis of his radiation theory". Proceedings of the Royal Dutch Academy of Sciences in Amsterdam 17: 870–873. 
• Einstein, A. (1905). "Über einen die Erzeugung und Verwandlung des Lichtes betreffenden heuristischen Gesichtspunkt". Annalen der Physik 17 (6): 132–148. Bibcode 1905AnP...322..132E. doi:10.1002/andp.19053220607. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/andp.19053220607/pdf.  Translated in Arons, A. B.; Peppard, M. B. (1965). "Einstein's proposal of the photon concept: A translation of the Annalen der Physik paper of 1905". American Journal of Physics 33 (5): 367. Bibcode 1965AmJPh..33..367A. doi:10.1119/1.1971542. http://astro1.panet.utoledo.edu/~ljc/PE_eng.pdf. 
• Einstein, A. (1916). "Zur Quantentheorie der Strahlung". Mitteilungen der Physikalischen Gessellschaft Zürich 18: 47–62.  and a nearly identical version Einstein, A. (1917). "Zur Quantentheorie der Strahlung". Physikalische Zeitschrift 18: 121–128. Bibcode 1917PhyZ...18..121E.  Translated in ter Haar, D. (1967). The Old Quantum Theory. Pergamon. pp. 167–183. LCCN 66029628.  See also [1].
• Einstein, A. (1993). The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein. volume 3. English translation by Beck, A.. Princeton University Press. ISBN 0-691-10250-3. 
• Feynman, R. P.; Leighton, R. B.; Sands, M. (1963). The Feynman Lectures on Physics, Volume 1. Addison-Wesley. ISBN 0-201-02010-6. 
• Fischer, T. (1 November 2011). "Topics: Derivation of Planck's Law". ThermalHUB. http://thermalhub.org/topics/DerivationofPlancksLaw. Retrieved 2011-11-01. 
• Goody, R. M.; Yung, Y. L. (1989). Atmospheric Radiation: Theoretical Basis (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780195102918. 
• Heisenberg, W. (1925). "Über quantentheoretische Umdeutung kinematischer und mechanischer Beziehungen". Zeitschrift für Physik 33: 879–893. Bibcode 1925ZPhy...33..879H. doi:10.1007/BF01328377.  Translated as "Quantum-theoretical Re-interpretation of kinematic and mechanical relations" in van der Waerden, B.L. (1967). Sources of Quantum Mechanics. North-Holland Publishing. pp. 261–276. 
• Heisenberg, W. (1930). The Physical Principles of the Quantum Theory. Eckart, C.; Hoyt, F. C. (transl.). University of Chicago Press. 
• Hermann, A. (1971). The Genesis of Quantum Theory. Nash, C.W. (transl.). MIT Press. ISBN 0-262-08047-8.  a translation of Frühgeschichte der Quantentheorie (1899–1913), Physik Verlag, Mosbach/Baden.
• Hettner, G. (1922). "Die Bedeutung von Rubens Arbeiten für die Plancksche Strahlungsformel". Naturwissenschaften 10: 1033–1038. Bibcode 1922NW.....10.1033H. doi:10.1007/BF01565205. 
• Jammer, M. (1989). The Conceptual Development of Quantum Mechanics (second ed.). Tomash Publishers American Institute of Physics. ISBN 0-88318-617-9. 
• Jeans, J. H. (1901). "The Distribution of Molecular Energy". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 196 (274–286): 397. Bibcode 1901RSPTA.196..397J. doi:10.1098/rsta.1901.0008. JSTOR 90811. 
• Jeans, J. H. (1905a). "XI. On the partition of energy between matter and æther". Philosophical Magazine 10 (55): 91. doi:10.1080/14786440509463348. 
• Jeans, J. H. (1905b). "On the Application of Statistical Mechanics to the General Dynamics of Matter and Ether". Proceedings of the Royal Society A 76 (510): 296. Bibcode 1905RSPSA..76..296J. doi:10.1098/rspa.1905.0029. JSTOR 92714. 
• Jeans, J. H. (1905c). "A Comparison between Two Theories of Radiation". Nature 72 (1865): 293. Bibcode 1905Natur..72..293J. doi:10.1038/072293d0. 
• Jeans, J. H. (1905d). "On the Laws of Radiation". Proceedings of the Royal Society A 76 (513): 545. Bibcode 1905RSPSA..76..545J. doi:10.1098/rspa.1905.0060. JSTOR 92704. 
• Jeffreys, H. (1973). Scientific Inference (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-08446-8. 
• Kangro, H. (1976). Early History of Planck's Radiation Law. Taylor and Francis. ISBN 0-85066-063-7. 
• Kirchhoff, G.; [27 October 1859] (1860a). "Über die Fraunhofer'schen Linien". Monatsberichte der Königlich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin: 662–665. 
• Kirchhoff, G.; [11 December 1859] (1860b). "Über den Zusammenhang zwischen Emission und Absorption von Licht und Wärme". Monatsberichte der Königlich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin: 783–787. 
• Kirchhoff, G. (1860c). "Ueber das Verhältniss zwischen dem Emissionsvermögen und dem Absorptionsvermögen der Körper für Wärme and Licht". Annalen der Physik und Chemie (Leipzig) 109: 275–301.  Translated by Guthrie, F. as Kirchhoff, G. (1860). "On the relation between the radiating and absorbing powers of different bodies for light and heat". Philosophical Magazine Series 4, volume 20: 1–21. 
• Kirchhoff, G. (1882) [1862], "Ueber das Verhältniss zwischen dem Emissionsvermögen und dem Absorptionsvermögen der Körper für Wärme und Licht", Gessamelte Abhandlungen, Leipzig: Johann Ambrosius Barth, pp. 571–598 
• Kittel, C.; Kroemer, H. (1980). Thermal Physics (2nd ed.). W. H. Freeman. ISBN 0-7167-1088-9. 
• Klein, M.J. (1962). "Max Planck and the beginnings of the quantum theory". Archive for History of Exact Sciences 1 (5): 459–479. doi:10.1007/BF00327765. 
• Kragh, H. (1999). Quantum Generations. A History of Physics in the Twentieth Century. Princeton University Press. ISBN 0-691-01206-7. 
• Kragh, H. (December 2000). "Max Planck: The reluctant revolutionary". Physics World. http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/print/373. 
• Kramm, K.; Mölders, N. (2009). "Planck's Blackbody Radiation Law: Presentation in Different Domains and Determination of the Related Dimensional Constant". Journal of the Calcutta Mathematical Society 5 (1–2): 27–61. arXiv:0901.1863. Bibcode 2009arXiv0901.1863K. 
• Kuhn, T. S. (1978). Black–Body Theory and the Quantum Discontinuity. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-502383-8. 
• Landsberg, P.T. (1961). Thermodynamics with Quantum Statistical Illustrations. Interscience Publishers. 
• Lewis, G. N. (1926). "The Conservation of Photons". Nature 118 (2981): 874. Bibcode 1926Natur.118..874L. doi:10.1038/118874a0. 
• Loudon, R. (2000). The Quantum Theory of Light (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN 0198501773. http://books.google.com/books?id=AEkfajgqldoC&pg=PA3. 
• Lowen, A. N.; Blanch, G. (1940). "Tables of Planck's radiation and photon functions". Journal of the Optical Society of America 30 (2): 70. doi:10.1364/JOSA.30.000070. 
• Lummer, O.; Kurlbaum, F. (1898). "Der electrisch geglühte "absolut schwarze" Körper und seine Temperaturmessung". Verhandlungen der Deutschen Physikalischen Gesselschaft 17: 106–111. 
• Lummer, O.; Pringsheim, E. (1899). "1. Die Vertheilung der Energie in Spectrum des schwarzen Körpers und des blanken Platins; 2. Temperaturbestimmung fester glühender Körper". Verhandlungen der Deutschen Physikalischen Gesselschaft 1: 215–235. 
• Mehra, J.; Rechenberg, H. (1982). The Historical Development of Quantum Theory. volume 1, part 1. Springer-Verlag. ISBN 0-387-90642-8. 
• Messiah, A. (1958). Quantum Mechanics. Temmer, G. G. (transl.). Wiley. 
• Mihalas, D.; Weibel-Mihalas, B. (1984). Foundations of Radiation Hydrodynamics. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-503437-6. 
• Milne, E.A. (1930). "Thermodynamics of the Stars". Handbuch der Astrophysik 3, part 1: 63–255. 
• Paltridge, G. W.; Platt, C. M. R. (1976). Radiative Processes in Meteorology and Climatology. Elsevier. ISBN 0-444-41444-4. 
• Pauli, W. (1973). Enz, C. P.. ed. Wave Mechanics. Margulies, S.; Lewis, H. R. (transl.). MIT Press. ISBN 0262160501. 
• Planck, M. (1900a). "Über eine Verbesserung der Wienschen Spektralgleichung". Verhandlungen der Deutschen Physikalischen Gesselschaft 2: 202–204.  Translated in ter Haar, D. (1967). "On an Improvement of Wien's Equation for the Spectrum". The Old Quantum Theory. Pergamon. pp. 79–81. LCCN 66029628. http://www.ffn.ub.es/luisnavarro/nuevo_maletin/Planck%20%281900%29,%20Improvement%20of%20Wien%27s.pdf. 
• Planck, M. (1900b). "Zur Theorie des Gesetzes der Energieverteilung im Normalspektrum". Verhandlungen der Deutschen Physikalischen Gesselschaft 2: 237.  Translated in ter Haar, D. (1967). "On the Theory of the Energy Distribution Law of the Normal Spectrum". The Old Quantum Theory. Pergamon. p. 82. LCCN 66029628. http://www.ffn.ub.es/luisnavarro/nuevo_maletin/Planck%20%281900%29,%20Distribution%20Law.pdf. 
• Planck, M. (1900c). "Entropie und Temperatur strahlender Wärme". Annalen der Physik 306 (4): 719–737. Bibcode 1900AnP...306..719P. doi:10.1002/andp.19003060410. 
• Planck, M. (1900d). "Ueber irreversible Strahlungsvorgänge". Annalen der Physik 306 (1): 69–122. Bibcode 1900AnP...306...69P. doi:10.1002/andp.19003060105. 
• Planck, M. (1901). "Über das Gesetz der Energieverteilung im Normalspektrum". Annalen der Physik 4: 553.  Translated in Ando, K.. "On the Law of Distribution of Energy in the Normal Spectrum". http://theochem.kuchem.kyoto-u.ac.jp/Ando/planck1901.pdf. Retrieved 2011-10-13. 
• Planck, M. (1906). Vorlesungen über die Theorie der Wärmestrahlung. Johann Ambrosius Barth. LCCN 07004527. 
• Planck, M. (1914). The Theory of Heat Radiation. Masius, M. (transl.) (2nd ed.). P. Blakiston's Son & Co. OL7154661M. 
• Planck, M. (1915). Eight Lectures on Theoretical Physics. Wills, A. P. (transl.). Dover Publications. ISBN 0-486-69730-4. 
• Planck, M. (1943). "Zur Geschichte der Auffindung des physikalischen Wirkungsquantums". Naturwissenschaften 31 (14–15): 153–159. Bibcode 1943NW.....31..153P. doi:10.1007/BF01475738. 
• Rayleigh, Lord (1900). "LIII. Remarks upon the law of complete radiation". Philosophical Magazine. 5 49 (301): 539. doi:10.1080/14786440009463878. 
• Rayleigh, Lord (1905). "The Dynamical Theory of Gases and of Radiation". Nature 72 (1855): 54–55. Bibcode 1905Natur..72...54R. doi:10.1038/072054c0. 
• Razavy, M. (2011). Heisenberg's Quantum Mechanics. World Scientific. ISBN 978-981-4304-10-8. 
• Rubens, H.; Kurlbaum, F. (1900a). "Über die Emission langer Wellen durch den schwarzen Körper". Verhandlungen der Deutschen Physikalischen Gesselschaft 2: 181. 
• Rubens, H.; Kurlbaum, F. (1900b). "Über die Emission langwelliger Wärmestrahlen durch den schwarzen Körper bei verschiedenen Temperaturen". Sitzungsberichte der Königlich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin: 929–941.  translated into English at Rubens, H.; Kurlbaum, F. (1901). "On the heat-radiation of long wave-length emitted by black bodies at different temperatures". Astrophysical Journal 14: 335–348. Bibcode 1901ApJ....14..335R. doi:10.1086/140874. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1901ApJ....14..335R. 
• Rybicki, G. B.; Lightman, A. P. (1979). Radiative Processes in Astrophysics. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 0-471-82759-2. http://books.google.com/books?id=LtdEjNABMlsC&printsec=frontcover. 
• Sharkov, E. A. (2003). "Black-body radiation". Passive Microwave Remote Sensing of the Earth. Springer. ISBN 978-3-540-43946-2. http://www.iki.rssi.ru/asp/pub_sha1/Sharch06.pdf. 
• Schiff, L. I. (1949). Quantum Mechanics. McGraw-Hill. 
• Schirrmacher, A. (2001). Experimenting theory: the proofs of Kirchhoff's radiation law before and after Planck. Münchner Zentrum für Wissenschafts und Technikgeschichte. 
• Schumm, B. A. (2004). Deep down things: the breathtaking beauty of particle physics. Johns Hopkins University Press. ISBN 978-0801879715. http://books.google.ca/books?id=htJbAf7xA_oC. 
• Schwinger, J. (2001). Englert, B.-G.. ed. Quantum Mechanics: Symbolism of Atomic Measurements. Springer. ISBN 3-540-41408-8. 
• Scully, M. O.; Zubairy, M.S. (1997). Quantum Optics. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-43458-0. 
• Siegel, D.M. (1976). "Balfour Stewart and Gustav Robert Kirchhoff: two independent approaches to "Kirchhoff's radiation law"". Isis 67: 565–600. 
• Siegel, R.; Howell, J. R. (2002). Thermal Radiation Heat Transfer, Volume 1 (4th ed.). Taylor & Francis. ISBN 9781560328391. http://books.google.com/books?id=O389yQ0-fecC&pg=PA25#v=onepage&q&f=false. 
• Sommerfeld, A. (1923). Atomic Structure and Spectral Lines. Brose, H. L. (transl.) (from 3rd German ed.). Methuen. http://books.google.com/books/about/Atomic_structure_and_spectral_lines.html?id=u1UmAAAAMAAJ. 
• Stehle, P. (1994). Order, Chaos, Order. The Transition from Classical to Quantum Physics. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-507513-7. 
• Stewart, B. (1858). "An account of some experiments on radiant heat". Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 22: 1–20. 
• ter Haar, D. (1967). The Old Quantum Theory. Pergamon. LCCN 66-029628. 
• Thornton, S. T.; Rex, A. F. (2002). Modern Physics. Thomson Learning. ISBN 0-03-006049-4. 
• Tyndall, J. (1865a). "Ueber leuchtende und dunkle Strahlung". Annalen der Physik und Chemie (Leipzig) 200: 36–53. 
• Tyndall, J. (1865b). Heat considered as a Mode of Motion. D. Appleton & Company. [2]
• Wien, W. (1896). "Ueber die Energievertheilung im Emissionsspectrum eines schwarzen Körpers". Annalen der Physik und Chemie (Leipzig) 294: 662–669. 

External links

• Summary of Radiation
• Radiation of a Blackbody – interactive simulation to play with Planck's law
• Scienceworld entry on Planck's Law