Jump to content

Plymouth Brethren

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Open&Candid (talk | contribs) at 22:25, 12 November 2022 (→UK government COVID-19 contracts: Clarified it was the Exclusive Brethren, now known as the Plymouth Brethren Christian Church, who were awarded contracts.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

A Plymouth Brethren church and congregation
Part of a series on
Protestantism
Latin version of the Christian cross which is used by virtually all Protestant denominations
Concepts
History
Branches
Movements
icon Christianity portal

The Plymouth Brethren or Assemblies of Brethren are a low church and non-conformist Christian movement whose history can be traced back to Dublin, Ireland, in the mid to late 1820s, where they originated from Anglicanism.[1][2] The group emphasizes sola scriptura, the belief that the Bible is the supreme authority for church doctrine and practice, over and above any other source of authority. Plymouth Brethren generally see themselves as a network of like-minded free churches, not as a Christian denomination.

History

Matthew 22:29 is cited by Plymouth Brethren in defence of the Bible being the road-map for their beliefs.

The Brethren movement began in Dublin, Ireland, where several groups of Christians met informally to celebrate the Lord's Supper together, the first meeting being in 1825.[3] The central figures were Anthony Norris Groves, a dentist studying theology at Trinity College; Edward Cronin, studying medicine, John Nelson Darby, a curate in County Wicklow; and John Gifford Bellett, a lawyer who brought them together. They did not have any liturgy, order of service, or even any ministers; in their view, since their guide was "the Bible alone" they sought to do it according to their own interpretation of the biblical text.

An important early stimulus was the study of prophecy, which was the subject of a number of annual meetings at Powerscourt House in County Wicklow starting in 1831. Lady Powerscourt had attended Henry Drummond's prophecy conferences at Albury Park, and Darby was espousing the same pre-tribulational view in 1831 as Edward Irving.[4] Many people came to these meetings who became important in the English movement, including Benjamin Wills Newton and George Müller.

The two main but conflicting aspirations of the movement were to create a holy and pure fellowship on one hand, and to allow all Christians into fellowship on the other.[5] Believers in the movement felt that the established Church of England had abandoned or distorted many of the ancient traditions of Christendom, following decades of dissent and the expansion of Methodism and political revolutions in the United States and France. People in the movement wanted simply to meet together in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ without reference to denominational differences.[6]

The first meeting in England was held in December 1831[7] in Plymouth, Devon. It was organised primarily by George Wigram, Benjamin Wills Newton, and John Nelson Darby.[8] The movement soon spread throughout the United Kingdom, and the assembly in Plymouth had more than 1,000 people in fellowship in 1845.[9] They became known as "the brethren from Plymouth" and were soon simply called "Plymouth Brethren". The term Darbyites is also used, especially when describing the Exclusive branch which has a more pronounced influence from Darby. Many within the movement refuse to accept any name other than "Christian".

John Nelson Darby.

In 1845, Darby returned from an extended visit to Switzerland where he had achieved considerable success planting churches. He returned to Plymouth where Newton was in control, and he disagreed with some details in a book that Newton had published concerning the tribulation that was coming. He also objected to Newton's place as an elder in the Plymouth meeting. But several attempts to settle the quarrel in the presence of other brethren failed to produce any clear result.[10] Two years later, Darby attacked Newton over a lecture that Newton had given on the 6th Psalm, and an exchange of tracts followed. Newton retracted some of his statements, but he eventually left Plymouth and established another chapel in London.

Darby had instituted a second meeting at Plymouth, and he complained of the Bristol Bethesda assembly in 1848, in which George Müller was prominent; he was concerned because they had accepted a member from Ebrington Street, Newton's original chapel. Bethesda investigated the individual but defended their decision, and Darby was not satisfied. He issued a circular on 26 August 1848, cutting off Bethesda and all assemblies who received anyone who went there. This defined the essential characteristic of "exclusivism" which he pursued for the rest of his life.[11]

The Exclusive Brethren experienced many subsequent splits, scatterings, and recombinations. The Open Brethren also suffered one split (concerning the autonomy of assemblies) which occurred at different times in different parts of the world. Nevertheless, both the Exclusive and the Open Brethren continued to expand their congregations, with the opens expanding more rapidly than the exclusives.[12]

Darby visited Exclusive assemblies in America seven times between 1862 and 1877.[13] Itinerant preachers from Scotland and Ireland established most of the early Open Brethren assemblies in America in the second half of the 19th century.[14]

Open Brethren

Main article: Open Brethren
A Plymouth Brethren chapel in Broadbridge Heath, West Sussex, England.

The best-known and oldest distinction between Open assemblies is in the nature of relationships among their local churches.[15][16] Open Brethren assemblies function as networks of like-minded independent local churches. Brethren generally feel an obligation to recognize and adhere to the disciplinary actions of other associated assemblies. Conversely, Open assemblies aware of that disciplining would not automatically feel a binding obligation to support it, treating each case on its own merit. Reasons for being put under discipline by both the Open and Exclusive Brethren include disseminating gross Scriptural or doctrinal error or being involved in unscriptural behavior. Being accused of illegal financial dealings may also result in being put under discipline.

Another less clear difference between assemblies lies in their approaches to collaborating with other Christians. Many Open Brethren will hold gospel meetings, youth events, or other activities in partnership with non-Brethren Evangelical Christian churches. More conservative Brethren tend to not support activities outside their own meetings.

International Brethren Conferences on Mission (IBCM) were founded in 1993 in Singapore by unions of churches from various countries.[17] According to an IBCM Network census released in 2020, they claimed 40,000 churches and 2,700,000 members in 155 countries.[18]

Exclusive Brethren

Main article: Exclusive Brethren

Exclusive Brethren have remained attached to Darby's doctrine.[19] They are more interdependent, more conservative with a propensity for a dress code, very attached to the spontaneity of worship and preaching. They form several more or less compartmentalized circles of communion, from the most moderate to the narrowest. The movement has a Protestant theology and recognizes infant baptism.[20] Around 40,000 worldwide in 2012, "close" brothers are often referred to as Darbyists, but rarely refer to themselves as such.[21]

Plymouth Brethren Christian Church

Main article: Plymouth Brethren Christian Church

The term Exclusive Brethren is most commonly used in the media to describe one separatist group known as Taylor-Hales Brethren, who now call themselves the Plymouth Brethren Christian Church (PBCC). The majority of Christians known as Exclusive Brethren are not connected with the Taylor-Hales group, who are known for their extreme interpretation of separation from evil and their belief of what constitutes fellowship. In their view, fellowship includes dining out, business and professional partnerships, membership of clubs, etc., rather than just the act of Communion (Lord's Supper), so these activities are done only with other members.

The group called the Raven Brethren (named for prominent Exclusive leader F.E. Raven) seceded from the Raven-Taylor-Hales group and are less strict and isolationist. Exclusive Brethren groups who are not affiliated with PBCC prefer being referred to as Closed rather than Exclusive brethren to avoid any connection with these more strident groups.

Brethren labels and distinctions

Terminology which sometimes confuses Brethren and non-Brethren alike is the distinction between the Open assemblies, usually called "Chapels", and the Closed assemblies (non-Exclusive), called "Gospel Halls." Contrary to common misconceptions, those traditionally known as the "Closed Brethren" are not a part of the Exclusive Brethren, but are rather a very conservative subset of the Open Brethren. The Gospel Halls regard reception to the assembly as a serious matter. One is not received to the Lord's Supper but to the fellowship of the assembly. This is important because the Lord's Supper is for believers, not unbelievers.

Some chapels, on the other hand, will allow practically anyone to participate who walks in and says that he is a Christian, based on the newcomer's profession of faith. Such assemblies are said to have an "open table" approach to strangers. Gospel Hall Brethren, on the other hand, generally believe that only those formally recognised as part of that or an equivalent assembly should break bread. Most Closed and some Open Brethren hold that association with evil defiles and that sharing the Communion meal can bring that association.

Their support text is from 1 Corinthians 15:33, "Do not be deceived: evil communications corrupt good manners." Among other distinctions, the Gospel Halls would generally not use musical instruments in their services, whereas many Chapels use them and may have singing groups, choirs, "worship teams" of musicians, etc. The Gospel Halls tend to be more conservative in dress; women do not wear trousers often, although they can and there is no scriptural objection in doing so, but most do not wear them in meetings and always have their heads covered, while in most Chapels women may wear whatever they wish, though modesty in dress serves as a guideline, and many continue the tradition of wearing a head covering taught in 1 Corinthians 11:2-13. Open Brethren churches are all independent, self-governing, local congregations with no central headquarters, although there are a number of seminaries, missions agencies, and publications that are widely supported by Brethren churches and which help to maintain a high degree of communication among them.

Henry K. Carroll performed an analysis of United States census data in 1912 to assign Roman numerals to various Brethren groups. For example, Brethren III is also known as the Lowe Brethren and the Elberfeld Brethren.[22] Carroll's initial findings listed four sub-groups, identified as Brethren I-IV,[23] but he expanded the number to six[24] and then to eight;[25] Arthur Carl Piepkorn expanded the number to ten.[26][27] Those who have attempted to trace the realignments of the Plymouth Brethren include Ian McDowell and Massimo Introvigne.[28][29] The complexity of the Brethren's history is evident in charts by McDowell and Ian McKay.[30][31]

Definition

Both Open and Exclusive Brethren have historically been known as "Plymouth Brethren." That is still largely the case in some areas, such as North America and Northern Ireland. In some other parts of the world such as Australia and New Zealand, most Open Brethren shun the "Plymouth" label. This is mostly because of widespread negative media coverage of the Plymouth Brethren Christian Church, the most hardline branch of the Exclusive Brethren (and the only numerically significant Exclusive group in either country), which most Open Brethren consider to be a cult with which they do not wish to be misidentified.

Leadership

One of the most defining elements of the Brethren is the rejection of the concept of clergy. Their view is that all Christians are ordained by God to serve and therefore all are ministers, in keeping with the doctrine of the priesthood of all believers. The Brethren embrace the most extensive form of that idea, in that there is no ordained or unordained person or group employed to function as minister(s) or pastors. Brethren assemblies are led by the local church elders within any fellowship.

Historically, there is no office of pastor in most Brethren churches, because they believe that the term pastor (ποιμην, poimen in Greek) as it is used in Ephesians 4:11 describes one of the gifts given to the church, rather than a specific office. In the words of Darby, these gifts in Ephesians 4:11 are "ministrations for gathering together and for edification established by Christ as Head of the body by means of gifts with which He endows persons as His choice."[32] Therefore, there is no formal ordination process for those who preach, teach, or lead within their meetings. Men who become elders, or those who become deacons and overseers within the fellowship, have been recognized by others within the individual assemblies and have been given the blessing of performing leadership tasks by the elders.[33]

An elder should be able and ready to teach when his assembly sees the "call of God" on his life to assume the office of elder (1 Timothy 3:2). Brethren elders conduct many other duties that would typically be performed by the clergy in other Christian groups, including counselling those who have decided to be baptized, performing baptisms, visiting the sick, and giving spiritual counsel in general. Normally, sermons are given either by the elders or by men who regularly attend the Sunday meetings—but, again, only men whom the elders recognize as having the "call of God" on their lives for that particular ministry. Visiting speakers, however, are usually paid their travel costs and provided for with Sunday meals following the meetings.

Open and Exclusive Brethren differ in how they interpret the concept of no clergy. The Open Brethren believe in a plurality of elders (Acts 14:23; 15:6,23; 20:17; Philippians 1:1), men meeting the Biblical qualifications found in 1 Timothy 3:1–7 and Titus 1:6–9. This position is also taken in some Baptist churches, especially Reformed Baptists, and by the Churches of Christ. It is understood that elders are appointed by the Holy Spirit (Acts 20:28) and are recognised as meeting the qualifications by the assembly and by previously existing elders. Generally, the elders themselves will look out for men who meet the biblical qualifications, and invite them to join them as elders. In some Open assemblies, elders are elected democratically, but this is a fairly recent development and is still relatively uncommon.

Officially naming and recognizing eldership is common to Open Brethren (cf. 1 Thessalonians 5:12–13), whereas many Exclusive Brethren assemblies believe that recognizing a man as an elder is too close to having clergy, and therefore a group of leading brothers, none of whom has an official title of any kind, attempts to present issues to the entire group for it to decide upon, believing that the whole group must decide, not merely a body of elders. Traditionally, only men are allowed to speak (and, in some cases, attend) these decision-making meetings, although not all assemblies follow that rule today.

The term elder is based on the same Scriptures that are used to identify bishops and overseers in other Christian circles,[34] and some Exclusive Brethren claim that the system of recognition of elders by the assembly means that the Open Brethren cannot claim full adherence to the doctrine of the priesthood of all believers.[35] Open Brethren consider, however, that this reveals a mistaken understanding of the priesthood of all believers which, in the Assemblies, has to do with the ability to directly offer worship to God and His Christ at the Lord's Supper, whether silently or audibly, without any human mediator being necessary—which is in accordance with 1 Timothy 2:5, where it is stated that Christ Jesus Himself is the sole Mediator between God and men (men being used here generically of mankind, and not referring simply and solely to males).

The Plymouth Brethren Christian Church, the most hardline of all the Exclusive Brethren groups, has developed into a de facto hierarchical body which operates under the headship of an Elect Vessel, currently Bruce Hales of Australia.

In place of an ordained ministry, an itinerant preacher often receives a "commendation" to the work of preaching and teaching that demonstrates the blessing and support of the assembly of origin. In most English-speaking countries, such preachers have traditionally been called full-time workers, labouring brothers, or on the Lord's work; in India, they are usually called Evangelists and very often are identified with Evg. in front of their name.

A given assembly may have any number of full-time workers, or none at all. In the last twenty years, many Open Assemblies in Australia and New Zealand, and some elsewhere, have begun calling their full-time workers pastors, but this is not seen as ordaining clergy and does not connote a transfer of any special spiritual authority. In such assemblies, the pastor is simply one of several elders, and differs from his fellow-elders only in being salaried to serve full-time. Depending on the assembly, he may or may not take a larger share of the responsibility for preaching than his fellow elders.

UK government COVID-19 contracts

Dozens of companies with connections to the Exclusive Brethren now known as the Plymouth Brethren Christian Church were awarded £2.2 billion in UK government COVID-19 contracts from the Department of Health and Social Care. This included providing Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). Several former members of the church have connections with the Conservative Party, and MPs have previously lobbied for the church to be given UK charitable status by the Charities Commission.[36][37]

Notable Brethren

This list consists of mostly nineteenth-century figures who were associated with the Brethren movement before the 1848 schism. They are the leading historical figures common to both the Open and Exclusive Brethren. Two exceptions are H.A. Ironside and Watchman Nee, twentieth-century preachers who spent time associated with both the Open and Exclusive Brethren. See the respective articles for other more recent figures who have functioned primarily or entirely in either the Open Brethren or Exclusive Brethren:

See also

Notes and references

  1. ^ Abigail, Shawn (June 2006). "What is the history of the 'Brethren'?". "Plymouth Brethren" FAQ. Archived from the original on 18 May 2016. Retrieved 12 June 2009.
  2. ^ Mackay, Harold (1981). Assembly Distinctives. Scarborough, Ontario: Everyday Publications. ISBN 978-0-88873-049-7. OCLC 15948378.[page needed]
  3. ^ Stephen Hunt, Handbook of Global Contemporary Christianity: Movements, Institutions, and Allegiance, BRILL, USA, 2016, p. 362
  4. ^ Sizer, Stephen. Chapter 3: Edward Irving (1792–1834) The Origins of the Rapture Doctrine. Archived from the original on 12 October 2006.
  5. ^ Shuff, Roger N. (1997). "Open to Closed: The Growth of Exclusivism among Brethren in Britain, 1848–1953". Brethren Archivists and Historians Network Review (1): 10, 14–15, 20–21.
  6. ^ See Grayson Carter, "Irish Millennialism: The Irish Prophetic Movement and the Origins of the Plymouth Brethren", in Anglican Evangelicals. Protestant Seceders from the via media, c.1800-1850 (2001/15).
  7. ^ Burnham, Jonathan D. (2004). "The Emergence of the Plymouth Brethren". A Story of Conflict: The Controversial Relationship Between Benjamin Wills Newton and John Nelson Darby. Carlisle: Paternoster Press. ISBN 978-1-84227-191-9. OCLC 56336926.[page needed]
  8. ^ Livingstone, Elizabeth A. (2000). The Concise Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-280057-2. OCLC 46858944.[page needed]
  9. ^ Noel, Napoleon (1936). The History of the Brethren. Denver: Knapp. p. 46. OCLC 2807272.
  10. ^ Neatby comments, "The important point is that the Brethren in their first great emergency found themselves absolutely unprepared to grapple with it. They had no constitution of any kind. They repudiated congregationalism, but they left their communities to fight their battles on no acknowledged basis and with no defined court of appeal."Neatby 1901, p. 61
  11. ^ Neatby 1901, pp. 61–84
  12. ^ As of the 1910 United States census, Open Brethren accounted for 71% of a total of 13,700 brethren in the US in 1916, though only 61% of 473 assemblies.United States Bureau of the Census (1916). Religious Bodies, 1916, Part II: Separate denominations. Retrieved 12 June 2012.
  13. ^ Sandeen, Ernest R. (2008). The Roots of Fundamentalism: British & American Millenarianism, 1800-1930. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. pp. 70–79.
  14. ^ Piepkorn 1970, p. 5.
  15. ^ Samuel S. Hill, Charles H. Lippy, Charles Reagan Wilson, Encyclopedia of Religion in the South, Mercer University Press, USA, 2005, p. 246
  16. ^ J. Gordon Melton, Martin Baumann, Religions of the World: A Comprehensive Encyclopedia of Beliefs and Practices, ABC-CLIO, USA, 2010, p. 609
  17. ^ Neil T. R. Dickson, Tim Grass, The Growth of the Brethren Movement: National and International Experiences, Wipf and Stock Publishers, USA, 2006, p. 9
  18. ^ IBCM, IBCM Network, ibcm.net, UK, retrieved August 22, 2020
  19. ^ J. Gordon Melton, Martin Baumann, Religions of the World: A Comprehensive Encyclopedia of Beliefs and Practices, ABC-CLIO, USA, 2010, p. 609
  20. ^ Massimo Introvigne, The Plymouth Brethren, Oxford University Press, USA, 2018, p. 81
  21. ^ Charles E. Farhadian, Introducing World Christianity, John Wiley & Sons, USA, 2012, p. 215
  22. ^ Introvigne, Massimo (2018). The Plymouth Brethren. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 86.
  23. ^ Carroll, Henry K. (1912). The religious forces of the United States enumerated, classified, and described; returns for 1900 and 1910 compared with the government census of 1890: condition and characteristics of Christianity in the United States. New York: C. Scribner’s Sons. p. xxii.
  24. ^ Religious Bodies 1916, pp. 169-176
  25. ^ Religious Bodies, 1936, Volume II, Part I, Denominations: A to J. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. 1941. pp. 294-328.
  26. ^ Piepkorn, Arthur Carl (1970). "Plymouth Brethren (Christian Brethren)" (PDF). Concordia Theological Monthly. No. 41. pp. 165–171. Retrieved 20 February 2020.
  27. ^ Piepkorn, Arthur Carl (1979). Profiles in Belief: The Religious Bodies of the United States and Canada, Volume IV: Evangelical, Fundamentalist, and Other Christian Bodies. New York: Harper & Row. pp. 29–32.
  28. ^ McDowell, Ian (1968). A Brief History of the "Brethren" (PDF). Sydney, Australia: Victory Press. Retrieved 10 June 2010.
  29. ^ Introvigne 2018, pp. 61-89.
  30. ^ McDowell 1968, p. 10.
  31. ^ McKay, Ian C., Dendrogram (PDF)
  32. ^ "Ephesians 4 Darby's Bible Synopsis". biblehub.com.
  33. ^ "Defining Religion In American Law". Archived from the original on 14 May 2006. Retrieved 18 July 2009.
  34. ^ "Elders and Bishops". Retrieved 18 July 2009.
  35. ^ "The Priesthood of All Believers". Archived from the original on 13 October 2004. Retrieved 18 July 2009.
  36. ^ Ellery, Ben. "Billions in Covid deals given to firms linked to Plymouth Brethren sect". The Times. ISSN 0140-0460. Retrieved 5 February 2022.
  37. ^ Times <info@bylinetimes.com> (https://bylinetimes.com/), Byline (18 November 2020). "Up to £1.1 Billion in Government PPE Contracts Awarded to Firms Linked to Religious Sect". Byline Times. Retrieved 5 February 2022. {{cite web}}: External link in |last= (help)
  38. ^ "BBC – Religion & Ethics – Exclusive Brethren: Introduction". Bbc.co.uk. 11 August 2009. Retrieved 24 October 2010.
  39. ^ "The Septuagint LXX". Ccel.org. Retrieved 24 October 2010.
  40. ^ "Brother Indeed – Robert Chapman " Articles & Links". Plymouthbrethren.wordpress.com. 7 July 2007. Retrieved 24 October 2010.
  41. ^ "Edward Cronin (1801–?) – Pioneers of homeopathy by T. L. Bradford". Homeoint.org. Retrieved 24 October 2010.
  42. ^ "The Brethren Writers' Hall of Fame". Newble.co.uk. Retrieved 24 October 2010.
  43. ^ "Dnzb.govt.nz". Retrieved 24 October 2010.
  44. ^ "How I lost my faith. Exclusive interview (in German) with Ken Follett about his childhood in a Brethren assembly in Wales". 30 September 2017. Retrieved 17 January 2018.
  45. ^ Wertheimer, Douglas (1982). "Gosse, Philip Henry". In Halpenny, Francess G (ed.). Dictionary of Canadian Biography. Vol. XI (1881–1890) (online ed.). University of Toronto Press.
  46. ^ "About Anthony Norris Grove". Web.ukonline.co.uk. Archived from the original on 12 October 2009. Retrieved 24 October 2010.
  47. ^ Gotell.gracenet.org Archived 17 December 2007 at the Wayback Machine
  48. ^ "Charles Henry Mackintosh Bio". Stempublishing.com. Retrieved 24 October 2010.
  49. ^ "History". Archived from the original on 27 April 2006.
  50. ^ "Laymansfellowship.com" (PDF).
  51. ^ "Biography of Thomas Newberry". Newblehome.co.uk. Retrieved 24 October 2010.
  52. ^ "Wellington – NZ News, World News, Stories & Opinions". Archived from the original on 28 November 2007.
  53. ^ "Mr. Newton and the "Brethren"". Spurgeon.org. Archived from the original on 26 June 2010. Retrieved 24 October 2010.
  54. ^ "Wordsearchbible.com". Archived from the original on 18 July 2011. Retrieved 24 October 2010.
  55. ^ "GV Wigram Bio". Stempublishing.com. Retrieved 24 October 2010.

Bibliography

Wikimedia Commons has media related to Plymouth Brethren.
Wikisource has several original texts related to Plymouth Brethren.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Plymouth_Brethren&oldid=1121552668"