R. Joseph Hoffmann

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
R. Joseph Hoffmann
R.Joseph Hoffmann 2
Born (1947-12-16) December 16, 1947 (age 66)
Residence Deer Isle, Maine[1]
Occupation Historian, Author, Lecturer

Raymond Joseph Hoffmann is a historian whose work has focused on the early social and intellectual development of Christianity.[2] His work includes a doctoral thesis on the role and dating of Marcion in the history of the New Testament, as well the reconstruction and translation of the writings of early pagan opponents of Chistianity: Celsus, Porphyry and Julian the Apostate. As a senior vice president for the Center for Inquiry, he chaired the Committee for the Scientific Examination of Religion, CSER, where he initiated the Jesus Project, a scholarly investigation into the historicity of Jesus. Hoffmann has described himself as "an unbeliever with a soft spot for religion".[3]

Background[edit]

Hoffmann holds graduate degrees in theology from Harvard Divinity School and a PhD in Christian Origins from the University of Oxford. He began his teaching career at the University of Michigan as assistant professor of Near Eastern Studies, where he developed the undergraduate and graduate program in Christian origins. From 1991 to 1999, he was senior lecturer in New Testament and Church History at Westminster College, Oxford.

Additional academic positions held include tutor in Greek at Keble College (1980–1983) and Senior Scholar at St Cross College, Oxford. He was the Wissenschaftlicher Assistant in Patristics and Classical Studies at the University of Heidelberg, the Campbell Professor of Religion and Human Values at Wells College until 2006 and the Distinguished Scholar at Goddard College in 2009. He has taught at Cal State Sacramento, the American University of Beirut and various universities in Africa (Malawi, Zimbabwe, and Botswana), the Middle East, the Pacific (Australia and Papua New Guinea) and South Asia, most recently as Visiting Professor of History at LUMS in Lahore, Pakistan and as Professor of Historical Linguistics at the Graduate University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences in Beijing.

As a fellow at the Center for Inquiry, he was Chair of the Committee for the Scientific Examination of Religion from 2003 to 2009, and a founding faculty member (1986) of the Humanist Institute.[4][5] He is presently Lecturer in the Liberal Arts at the New England Conservatory.[1][6]

Scholarly work[edit]

Marcion[edit]

Hoffmann's 1982 doctoral thesis, Marcion: On the Restitution of Christianity, was published in 1984. Hoffmann proposed that Marcion must be dated substantially before the dates assigned on the basis of patristic testimony. According to Hoffmann, Marcion possessed the earliest version of Luke and preserved the primitive version of Paul's letters. He also attempted to discredit much of the early patristic evidence for Marcion's life and thought as being apologetically driven.

Reviews of this work reflected its controversial nature. Writing in Revue Biblique, Jerome Murphy-O'Connor called attention to the radical nature of Hoffmann's theory while asserting that it was "unlikely that a book of equal importance will appear in this generation."[7] J. L. Houlden commended Hoffmann's skill in "reading between the lines" of Marcion's ancient critics and called the book "a model of how doctrinal history should now be written",[8] while George E. Saint-Laurent concluded, "[H]ereafter Marcion's positive contribution to the mainstream tradition of Catholic-Orthodox Christianity so far as the decisive role of Paul is concerned will have to be acknowledged."[9] Other reviewers thought that Hoffmann's examination of the evidence was valuable but that his conclusions could only be regarded as speculative.[10][11] The book received a very negative assessment from C. P. Bammel, who accused the author of numerous historical errors and misinterpretations of patristic texts.[12] In a book published in 1993, Bart D. Ehrman noted that Hoffmann's Marcion had "not been well received".[13]

Hoffmann responded to critics of the Marcion in a special issue of The Second Century.[14] His thesis has since been revisited by New Testament scholars including David Trobisch, Joseph Tyson and Robert M. Price.[15][16][17]

Ancient critics of Christianity[edit]

Hoffmann has also published English translations of three early pagan opponents of Christianity. In each case the original work has been lost but the arguments have survived through contemporary works written to refute them. The first, Celsus: On the True Doctrine was published in 1987. Hoffmann recreated the arguments of Celsus using the work Contra Celsum, written by Origen of Alexandria. Theology professor William Weinrich commented that Hoffmann "wisely forgoes any attempt to restore the original order of Celsus' work, opting rather to present Celsus' writing thematically."[18]

In 1994 Hoffmann published Porphyry: Against the Christians (the Literary Remains). Hoffmann's work is a new translation based on a 15th-century manuscript preserved by Macarius Magnes. The author of the criticisms in that manuscript is not known with certainty. The argument that the critic was Porphyry was first advanced by the historian Adolph von Harnack,[19] though his theory been disputed.[20] In a recent translation of the contemporary works citing Against the Christians, Robert M. Berchman notes that Hoffmann's translation is "an important contribution to the study of the text."[21]

In 2004 he published a translation of Julian: Against the Galileans, a work by the last non-Christian Roman Emperor, Julian. Julian's arguments survived through the work Contra Julianum written by Cyril of Alexandria.

The "Jesus Project"[edit]

In 2007 Hoffmann, together with New Testament scholars Robert Price and Gerd Luedemann, announced the formation of a colloquium to re-examine the traditions for the existence of a historical Jesus.[22][23] The initial meeting of the so-called "Jesus Project[24] " took place in Amherst, NY, December 5–7, 2008 and included fifteen scholars from a variety of disciplines including James Tabor, Robert Eisenman, and Bruce Chilton. The Project, according to Hoffmann, was designed to determine "what can be reliably recovered about the historical figure of Jesus, his life, his teachings, and his activities, utilizing the highest standards of scientific and scholarly objectivity".[25] The Project was seen as a continuation and modification of the Jesus Seminar, founded by Robert Funk and John Dominic Crossan.[25][26] In 2009 the Center for Inquiry de-funded the Jesus Project and discontinued CSER.[27] In 2012, Hoffmann announced a new consortium called "The Jesus Process" to further investigate Christian origins.[28]

Humanist and atheist criticisms[edit]

Though Hoffmann self identifies as a humanist, he has been an outspoken critic of many aspects of contemporary humanism and atheism. In 2007, following comments from Greg Epstein, the Humanist Chaplain at Harvard, suggesting that atheist authors Sam Harris and Richard Dawkins were "atheist fundamentalists", Hoffmann wrote a publicly posted letter that called Epstein confused and accused him of abusing the Harvard name to stake out his own divisive position.[29][30] He further criticised Epstein's "New Humanism"[31] as "Gen-X humanism for the passionately confused".[29][32][33]

Hoffmann has also expressed criticism of the tactics employed by the modern New Atheist movement. In 2009 blog post discussing the Center for Inquiry's Blasphemy Day he wrote new atheism is "really nothing more than the triumph of the jerks".[34] Commenting about the American Humanist Association's selection of P.Z. Myers as 2009 Humanist of the Year he wrote "humanism, infused and high-jacked by the “new” atheism, has been turned into a parody of serious humanist principles and ideals".[35] Hoffmann has also decried the lack of historical theological knowledge of many New Atheism proponents, criticizing the work of atheist writers Richard Dawkins, Sam Harris and Daniel Dennett as being historically naive in a 2006 Free Inquiry article.[36]

In comments regarding religion in popular culture, Hoffmann had welcomed the attention drawn to debates about early Christianity by the documentary film The Lost Tomb of Jesus (2007), but rejected the filmmakers' conclusion that the Talpiot Tomb was the burial place of Jesus and his family.[37] He has also criticised the sensationalism attached to The Da Vinci Code as a confusing blend of history and fiction.[38]

Selected works[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b "Open Salon Blog". Retrieved 26 February 2014. 
  2. ^ "Point of Inquiry - The Scientific Study of Religion". Retrieved 25 February 2014. 
  3. ^ "Lament of a Soft Shelled Anti-American Atheist". The New Oxonian. Retrieved 25 February 2014. 
  4. ^ "Vita Brevis". Retrieved 19 January 2014. 
  5. ^ "R.Joseph Hoffmann, Center for Inquiry Bio". Retrieved 28 February 2014. 
  6. ^ "Twitter home page". Retrieved 26 February 2014. 
  7. ^ Murphy-O'Connor, Jerome. April 1986. Review of R. Joseph Hoffmann, Marcion: On the Restitution of Christianity. Revue Biblique, 46, 311-312
  8. ^ J. L. Houlden (August 1984). "Marcion revisited". Expository Times 95 (11): 345. doi:10.1177/001452468409501119. 
  9. ^ George E. Saint-Laurent (Spring 1986). "Review of Marcion". Journal of the American Academy of Religion 54 (1): 176–177. "no" 
  10. ^ Robert B. Eno (March 1985). "Review of Marcion". Theological Studies 46 (1): 173–174. "no" 
  11. ^ LeMoine G. Lewis (June 1985). "Review of Marcion". Church History 54 (2): 230. doi:10.2307/3167238. "no" 
  12. ^ C. P. Bammel (April 1988). "Review of Marcion". Journal of Theological Studies 39 (1): 227–232. doi:10.1093/jts/39.1.227. "no" 
  13. ^ Bart D. Ehrman (1996) [1993]. The Orthodox Corruption of Scripture: The Effect of Early Christological Controversies on the Text of the New Testament. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 245 n. 22. ISBN 0-19-510279-7. 
  14. ^ R. Joseph Hoffmann (1987/88). "How Then Know This Troublous Teacher? Further Reflections on Marcion and his Church". Second Century 6 (3): 173–191. 
  15. ^ David Trobisch (2000). The First Edition of the New Testament. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-511240-7. 
  16. ^ Joseph B. Tyson (2006). Marcion and Luke-Acts: A Defining Struggle. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press. ISBN 1-57003-650-0. 
  17. ^ Robert M. Price, Review of Gerd Luedemann, Heretics: The Other Side of Christianity (1996) [1] Tetrieved on 2008-10-17
  18. ^ Weinrich, William C. 1987. Review of R. Joseph Hoffmann, Celsus On the True Doctrine. Concordia Theological Quarterly,51, 296-297.
  19. ^ "http://www.tertullian.org/rpearse/porphyry/hoffmann.htm". Retrieved 2 March 2014. 
  20. ^ T.D. Barnes (1973). "Porphyry Against the Christians: Date and the Attribution of Fragments". Journal of Theological Studies 24(2), 424-442.
  21. ^ Berchman, Robert M. Porphyry Against the Christians(2005). E.J. Brill, Leiden, p. x. ISBN 90-04-14811-6
  22. ^ Jennifer Green,"Where Angels Fear to Tread". Ottawa Citizen(April 2007)[2] Retrieved on 2008-17-10
  23. ^ "The Jesus Project" http://www.centerforinquiry.net/jesusproject
  24. ^ "Point of Inquiry-The Jesus Project". Retrieved 19 January 2014. 
  25. ^ a b Csillag, Ron (2008-12-27). "For scholars, a combustible question: Was Christ real?". The Star (Toronto). Retrieved 2010-05-22. 
  26. ^ Project-ing Jesus | Gleanings | ChristianityToday.com
  27. ^ "Processing the Project". Retrieved 22 February 2014. 
  28. ^ "The Jesus Process". Retrieved 22 February 2014. 
  29. ^ a b "Greg Epstein does not equal Humanism". Brian Flemming's Weblog. Retrieved 9 March 2014. 
  30. ^ Lisa Miller (June 18, 2007). "BeliefWatch: Smackdown". Newsweek (LexisNexis reprint). 
  31. ^ "The New Humanism,"http://www.thenewhumanism.org/ Retrieved on 31-08-2008
  32. ^ "The Nonbelievers". Retrieved 4 March 2014. 
  33. ^ "Removing Religion from Holidays a Tall Order". NPR.org. Retrieved 4 March 2014. 
  34. ^ "Atheist Tantrums: the New Loud". Retrieved 8 March 2014. 
  35. ^ "On the Dignity of Humanism". Retrieved 8 March 2014. 
  36. ^ "Why 'Hard Science' Won't Cure 'Easy' Religion" Free Inquiry(2006) 26(3), 47-9
  37. ^ "Who is Entombed in the 'Jesus Tomb'?" U.S. News, March 12, 2007, p. 34-35
  38. ^ "Examining the DaVinci Code". Point of Inquiry. Retrieved 15 March 2014. 

External links[edit]