Jump to content

S v Mhlungu

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by BrownHairedGirl (talk | contribs) at 07:40, 27 April 2022 (add {{Use dmy dates}}). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

S v Mhlungu
CourtConstitutional Court of South Africa
Full case name State v Mhlungu and Others
Decided8 June 1995 (1995-06-08)
Citations[1995] ZACC 4, 1995 (3) SA 867 (CC), 1995 (7) BCLR 793 (CC)
Case history
Prior actionReferral from Natal Provincial Division
Court membership
Judges sittingChaskalson P, Ackermann, Didcott, Kriegler, Langa, Madala, Mahomed, Mokgoro, O'Regan & Sachs JJ, Kentridge AJ
Case opinions
Decision byMahomed

S v Mhlungu and Others is a decision of the Constitutional Court of South Africa in which the court interpreted a transitional provision in the Interim Constitution of South Africa relating to the handling of criminal cases that were pending when that constitution came into force on 27 April 1994. The ruling, handed down on 8 June 1995, held that such cases were subject to the human rights protections in Chapter 3 of the Interim Constitution despite a clause appearing to exclude them.

References

  • Fagan, Eduard (1996). "The Longest Erratum Note in History: S v Mhlungu and Others". South African Journal on Human Rights. 12: 79–89.
  • Smith, Nicholas (1996). "The Purposes Behind the Words: S v Mhlungu and Others". South African Journal on Human Rights. 12: 90–98.