Talk:2015 Castilian-Manchegan regional election

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Spain Low‑importance

	Spain portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cortes or Courts[edit]

The word Courts should be replaced with Cortes. The article for the assembly is Cortes of Castile-La Mancha and that for the national legislature is Cortes Generales. Courts in English usually means the judicial system of legal adminstration. --Cavrdg (talk) 13:27, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The use of the Spanish term can lead to confusion, because in other regions which also have "Courts", they are usually refered to in other languages (i.e. in the Valencian Community the original name is in Catalan/Valencian (Corts), not the Spanish "Cortes", as does happen in Aragon). In order to avoid having to use different languages to refer to the same word in different articles, the English translation, "Courts" is used generically for them all, since the word is the same. One of the meanings of courts is just that, of a "legislative assembly" (see here). Polysemic words are common, and "courts" is no exception. We can't argue that we can't use it to refer to a legislative assembly (which would be gramatically correct) just because it is more frequently used to refer to other administrations (such as the judiciary). Impru20 (talk) 13:42, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just looking at List of Spanish regional legislatures, it seems we do follow the Spanish naming so es:Cortes de Castilla y León is Cortes of Castile and León while ca:Parlament de Catalunya / es:Parlamento de Cataluña is Parliament of Catalonia. It seems very odd to use a different name in the election pages from that used for the main article. If you really think Courts is the better name, you should propose moving the articles. --Cavrdg (talk) 14:01, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it is very odd, and that is why I resorted from using "Cortes/Corts" to "Courts" (as well as because for some elections we just say "Parliament" and not "Parlamento", for instance). Anyway, keep in mind that here we are discussing about how to refer to the legislative assemblies within the election articles, which isn't linked to how the articles for those legislative assemblies are named (just see how names linking to an article are most frequently not written in the same way as the article title). The articles having a given name is no impediment to use a different translation elsewhere. Impru20 (talk) 14:13, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Castile-La Mancha parliamentary election, 2015. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:25, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]