Talk:6th Battalion (Australia)/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: GregJackP Boomer! 17:40, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Passed Quick Fail check. GregJackP Boomer! 17:49, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Comments: 1b - MOS: If you are going to use AIF as an abbreviation, you need to indicate that where it is spelled out the first time per MOS:Abbreviations. I'm not sure on the abbreviations for the decorations, while they might be known within the Commonwealth, us poor Yanks don't have a clue what they mean. Based on you spelling out the foreign awards, for clarity you may want to do that here also. Otherwise, outstanding work, as is normal for you. Regards, GregJackP Boomer! 19:45, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi GregJackP. Thanks for the review. I think I've rectified those issues. Cheers. AustralianRupert (talk) 21:41, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Passed. GregJackP Boomer! 22:18, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]