Talk:A Marine Story

This article has graduated from the Article Incubator.

Move from incubator[edit]

I've moved this article into mainspace from the incubator. A previous version was deleted after discussion. The project has now apparently been filmed, released and commented upon, so I find it again worthy of judgement under notability guidelines. The substantive talk page content was a commented-out Film Project assessment, since it will require re-assessment I did not restore the talk page. Franamax (talk) 22:42, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Crass Advertisement for the film maker[edit]

This entry is obviously not meant to be an encyclopedia entry. It is pulled exclusively from the boxtop and the film maker's website (either directly or indirectly). There are so many problems it is impossible to list them all, but I'll list some in the hopes that the article will be scrapped and someone besides the film maker writes a new one.

The very first sentence says the film is about the military's don't ask don't tell policy. But, it is not about the policy. It is purposely misleading to say so. It is, in fact, a fictional account of one person's experience with the DADT policy. That's a big difference.

The plot summary is not a plot summary by Wikipedia standards. It is pulled directly from the manufacturers boxtop and ads. It is a shameless copy/past of the boxtop teaser.

The Reception section has nothing to do with the reception, but rather is a listing of praise from various sources. IMDB lists it as 5.7. Metacritic pegs it at 51/100. Brian Miller of the Village Voice says of it:

"The movie becomes a lesbian amalgam of "Walking Tall" and "Billy Jack." Relentlessly clumsy and predictable, A Marine Story is set in late 2008, just as a new political breeze is blowing. But its abrupt, wishful postscript is still just a fairy tale."

Finally, there are no external links given for Metacritic, IMDB, or Rottentomatoes, all of which would give a far more encyclopedic view if this film that the current Wikipedia entry. I've read dozens/hundreds of movie review on Wikipedia, and this is by far the worst.

Really, this shameless ad should be removed.

N0w8st8s (talk) 01:33, 1 May 2012 (UTC)n0w8st8s[reply]

Dead link[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/awards/news/e3i0f75039b1d6e000771352920e329f6dd
- In Dreya Weber on 2011-03-17 16:18:42, 404 Not Found
- In A Marine Story on 2011-06-20 01:36:44, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 01:37, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on A Marine Story. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:00, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]