Talk:Acrocat Software
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
This topic is not blatant advertising... it is factual data about a real company. Please visit Handmark and you'll see that it and dozens of other articles about Palm software companies exist and should exist. The community of Palm companies is diverse and often made of smaller companies.
Shouldn't criticism of this nature come from someone more familiar with this topic in general?
BTW - the links were part of an effort to establish that there is media coverage for both Acrocat and its applications. If we leave that out, we're told that there are no references. If we leave it in, we're told it's advertising.
I'd be able to add more data to this article as time goes by, but it's hard to do if the article keeps getting deleted. Given that there are over 1.95 million articles, why are we picking on a legitimate topic? After all, someone created a Chinese topic for AcroWiki. Shouldn't someone be able to reference the company that makes AcroWiki?