Talk:Addicted to You (Shakira song)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Hmlarson (talk · contribs) 01:37, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have begun the review and will be posting feedback below. As issues are addressed, please add a note indicating your changes to the relevant item below. Thank you. Hmlarson (talk) 01:37, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lead[edit]

  • Please modify "and is one of the merengue-influenced songs from the album" to either "is one of (many/several/a few? or actual #)" or "is a merengue-influenced song from the album"
I took the latter approach. --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 07:50, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Despite having a title in English, " -> change to "Despite having an English title, " or something similar
 Done --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 07:50, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Critics praised the video's overall appeal and Shakira's appearance." Consider changing to "Many critics"
 Done --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 07:50, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Background and composition[edit]

  • " Despite having a title in English," change to "Despite having an English title, " or something similar
 Done --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 07:50, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Music video[edit]

  • Change "at Valencia" to "in Valencia"
 Done --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 07:50, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Change T-shirt to t-shirt
 Done --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 07:50, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Change "sports shoulder length" to "sports shoulder-length"
 Done --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 07:50, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • "The video was met with positive critical reception" --> consider changing to "Critical reception of the video was generally positive" or something similar
 Done --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 07:50, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Certifications[edit]

  • Consider combining with Charts section per other GA articles about Shakira songs
I merged it since it's just one certification. --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 07:50, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disamb, References & External links[edit]

  • Fix link to Idolator
 Fixed --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 07:50, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Fix Top 50 Canciones Anual 2012 reference (dead link)
 Fixed --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 07:50, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox[edit]

  • Should Pop/Rock be added as genre?
Actually it's neither just pop/rock. I think we should be specific in this category, hence I listed merengue. --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 07:50, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
You can add multiple. I personally would argue that the genre is pop/rock, more specifically Latin pop with merengue and reggaeton influences/styles (similar to what is described in the lead). This is always a subjective decision/classification, IMO. No change is necessary if you do not agree. Hmlarson (talk) 17:42, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Review checklist[edit]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    Excellent, well-written article. I have a few suggestions listed above; but overall, very well done.
Thank you! --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 07:50, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  1. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  2. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  3. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  4. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  5. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    Verified.
  6. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
I have addressed the comments. Thank you for the review! --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 07:50, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Great job! I've checked the edits - all looks good. Hmlarson (talk) 17:44, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much! --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 17:48, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.