Talk:Alma (Crimea)

Ukraine Low‑importance

	Ukraine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ukraine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ukraine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.UkraineWikipedia:WikiProject UkraineTemplate:WikiProject UkraineUkraine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rivers Low‑importance

	Geography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 30 March 2018[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not Moved. No consensus for move. (non-admin closure) –Ammarpad (talk) 06:59, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Alma River (Crimea) → Alma River – Already redirects there. Srnec (talk) 00:59, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 01:13, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion is needed to determine whether there is a primary topic. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 01:13, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
(It redirects there because another user moved the dab page and changed the redirect without discussion earlier this week. Dekimasuよ! 01:18, 30 March 2018 (UTC))[reply]
- I have reverted the move of the disambiguation page Alma River. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 01:31, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose neither that notable. In ictu oculi (talk) 07:05, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Clear TWODABS situation. Primary topic is about relative notability. Given the clear historic significance at the site of the proposed topic, this move makes sense.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Yaksar (talk • contribs)
Note that the the German DAB page has two blue links we don't have. Srnec (talk) 21:25, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. No clear primary topic. Dab page should remain at the base term. —Xezbeth (talk) 07:19, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.