is it just me or does this article read like an essay? there's not much I can do right now; my return key is broken D= kaiti-sicle 04:24, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
On Apologizing (13 February edit)
I think the previous version of the “Apology” entry should be retained, for two reasons. First, there is absolutely no relevant content here related to the subject of “apologies” or “apologizing” the topic of this page. It is more than a little peculiar for Wikpedia’s editors to include and retain a Seinfeld link/reference but to delete content related to apologizing. Second, there are no relevant links from this page directing readers (and students) to relevant material on the web dealing with the subject. I (and the students in my ‘sociology of human interaction’ class to whom I recommended the Wikpedia “apology” page) also found the perfectapology link very useful and appropriate to the subject. The material is entirely consistent with Wikpedia’s interest in providing links to relevant content. The deletion was brought to my attention by those student who could not find the material “on apologizing.” Without it, there is nothing on this page that is of relevance to anyone wanting to find information on “apologies.” —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 18.104.22.168 (talk) 15:25, 16 February 2007 (UTC).