Talk:Koko Pimentel

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Aquilino Pimentel III)

Untitled[edit]

I added the court ruling today paving way for zubiri's proclamation.

--Florentino floro 15:42, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Proclamation[edit]

Pimentel lost to Zubiri.

--Florentino floro 06:09, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

SET resolution[edit]

The Senate Electoral Tribunal (SET) on June 19, 2008 resolved to proceed with the election protest of Aquilino "Koko" Pimentel III: "Indeed, there is reasonable ground to believe that the final outcome of the case could affect the officially proclaimed results of the 12th senatorial position in the 14 May 2007 national elections, hence, the election protest case deserves further proceedings by the tribunal."abs-cbnnews.com, Tribunal finds basis to proceed with Koko 2007 elections protest--Florentino floro (talk) 10:47, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism[edit]

Aquilino “Koko” Pimentel III denied protective custody to witness Edgar Matobato in the senate hearings over extrajudicial killings.

122.52.67.234 (talk)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Aquilino Pimentel III. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:32, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 29 May 2018[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 03:52, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Koko Pimental → Koko Pimentel – The title of the article has been misspelled "Pimental" instead of "Pimentel". It was either deliberate vandalism or a typographical error. I'm alarmed that the previous move was done 27 March 2018‎ yet has been apparently unnoticed. Jollibinay (talk) 00:56, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Semi-protected edit request on 25 March 2020[edit]

I want to correct a grammar error in this wikipedia page SiomaiRice123 (talk) 12:13, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. It's not clear what changes you want to make. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 13:15, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 5 April 2020[edit]

PLEASE DELETE THESE WRONGFUL NARRATIVE BELOW BECAUSE IT SENATOR KOKO PIMENTEL DID NOT INTERACT WITH THE RESOURCE PERSON DURING THE SENATE HEARING ON MARCH 5. HE WAS NOT PRESENT DURING THE HEARING. HE WAS NOT ALSO IDENTIFIED AS A PERSON OR PATIENT UNDER MONITORING AS NO DOCTOR OR HEALTHWORKER HAS DECLARED HIM AS ONE. ACCORDING TO HIM, HE NEVER IDENTIFIED AND CONSIDERED HIMSELF AS ONE. AT THE SAME TIME, ACCORDING TO THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ITS GUIDELINES, ONLY A DOCTOR OR HEALTHWORKER COULD DECLARE A PERSON AS A PERSON UNDER MONITORING OR INVESTIGATION:Attycao (talk) 13:32, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[1][reply]

Pimentel had interacted with a resource person during a Senate session last March 5 who tested positive for the virus, which prompted other senators to also undergo testing and self-quarantine; Zubiri and Sonny Angara also tested positive.[36] At the time Pimentel confirmed his diagnosis, he had visited the Makati Medical Center to accompany his wife who was in labor. The Makati Medical Center issued a press release criticizing Pimentel for violating the hospital's home quarantine protocol, which required "patients under monitoring" (the official designation by the Philippine Department of Health) to self-isolate in order to avoid exposing health professionals and other patients to possible infection.[37] Attycao (talk) 13:32, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Before starting, I'd like to remind you to please stay WP:POLITE when making requests. Even though you may be distraught, please observe proper capitalization as much as possible.
Now with that out of the way, I wanted to say that I have reworded the paragraph and added extra citations to make it correct. The entire paragraph did not warrant deletion, since it had adequate sources. I simply reworded it and added more sources to make it much more factual.
I edited the paragraph such that there is a clearer timeline of events, and revised the part stating that Pimentel had been in the session on March 5, since I could not find any source that backed that claim up. As for the comment about being a PUM or a PUI, I kept that in (although added citations) since Pimentel had fit the classification tool provided by DOH. Additionally, Department of Interior and Local Government Secretary Eduardo Año, a part of the Inter-Agency Task Force for the Management of Emerging Infectious Diseases (IATF-EID), stated that a requirement of taking the COVID-19 test was to be a PUI, which meant that prior to testing, Pimentel had already been classified as a person under investigation. Even if he were not publicly classified as a PUM or a PUI by himself or a doctor, we can assume that the Research Institute for Tropical Medicine had already classified him as one, otherwise he would have never been allowed to take the test.
 Reworded. Thanks for bringing the error to light, and welcome to Wikipedia! Chlod (say hi!) 14:27, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ https://news.abs-cbn.com/news/03/26/20/koko-pimentel-denies-violating-coronavirus-quarantine-covid-19
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Koko_Pimentel&oldid=1209760344"