Talk:Ave Satani

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Horror

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

No Idea[edit]

"... and came up with ideas while talking with the London choir-master of the orchestra that was helping him." I have no real idea what this means. There is no such thing as a choir-master of an orchestra. Is it the choir-master of the choir which usually works with that particular orchestra? Also, I don't think Goldsmith was composing the MAIN TITLE of the picture just on the fly while recording the soundtrack. Really, the MAIN TITLE? He would have written this quite some time before the recording session. Maybe that's not what is being implied, though. Essentially, the story of the composition of this piece has apparently been misunderstood and is distorted. A little research and a rewrite is needed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gingermint (talk • contribs) 22:00, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Da Vinci Code?[edit]

The song has been described as "hair-raising"[4] although one journalist reviewing the soundtrack of the Da Vinci code considered "Ave Satani" to be "nonsense" in comparison to that more restrained soundtrack.[5]

I fail to see exactly how the Da Vinci Code soundtrack could be considered a pertinent point of comparison, in any respect. Moreover, the quote's purpose seems itself ambiguous as presented... From what I gather, Ave Satani isn't part of that soundtrack and while some tracks may stylistically borrow from the same influences as Ave Satani (though I have no reason to believe so at this time), the second part of that sentence (after reference 4) should be removed as it brings nothing of note to the article and implies an unsubstantiated link between the two works. --69.70.144.146 (talk) 18:50, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, can you edit it? Some of the style in this article and related articles (like those that link to this one) could be improved, also - to bring it more in line with an objective encyclopedia article. For example, you may be interested to see how "Ave Satani" is discussed in the Hail Satan article.Jimhoward72 (talk) 09:46, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"correct" latin.[edit]

ave and corpus edimus are EXACTLY THE SAME in both "versions". why put themKRISHANKO (talk) 23:32, 7 May 2014 (UTC)?[reply]

Removed WP Horror Tag[edit]

Main Project page states that horror oriented songs are not covered by the project ("This project's scope does not include musicians or songs that could be constituted as horror-oriented",Wikipedia:WikiProject Horror) --KWWight (talk) 07:21, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Ave Satani. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081004174957/http://www.nypost.com:80/entertainment/movies/news/n13719.htm to http://www.nypost.com/entertainment/movies/news/n13719.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:39, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]