Talk:BRDM-1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

FUG[edit]

The FUG was an original hungarian design (Rába chassis, Csepel engine & suspension), not a copy (AND the layout similar to brdm-2 not to brdm-1! EG rear engine) source: Varga A. József ; Bárdos András [et al.] 2008. Magyar autógyárak katonai járművei. – Budapest, Maróti Könyvkereskedés és Könyvkiadó Kft, 493 p. ISBN 963 9005 95 9 GaborV — Preceding unsigned comment added by 160.114.153.173 (talk) 18:49, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

BRDM obr. 1957 ... BRDM obr. 1958[edit]

"obr" stands for образец, sample, model, template, make, perhaps same as Britisih "mark" in tanks.

I guess it is to be translated rather than just sonverted from cyrillics to latin letters. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.140.21.188 (talk) 20:33, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I talked with specialist on Soviet AFVs a few months ago and we decided it would be better to leave it like this. Regards. - SuperTank17 (talk) 20:49, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's common in English-language writing to use terminology like BRDM model 1958 for Soviet AFVs, for example, in T-34#Model designations. Obr. is almost never used verbatim, even in specialist publications, because it has no meaning to English readers, all the more so in a general source like Wikipedia.

Which specialist did you talk to, Supertank? —Michael Z. 2008-08-24 21:23 z

I was talking with Dendirrek. He/she has a vast knowledge about Soviet AFVs and as far as I know has access to many sources about the subject. If you want you can ask him/her yourself at his/her talk page. Regards. - SuperTank17 (talk) 21:28, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, I see he also told you to beware of false information in the JED site. I've found problems with it too. —Michael Z. 2008-08-24 21:49 z
Some of the information there is false, yes, but some of it is still true. Regards. - SuperTank17 (talk) 22:06, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tone Tag[edit]

I have added a tag asking for editing to improve style/tone. The article is pretty much breathless, with too many run-on sentences and a style that makes it a bit hard to read. I would go about a rewrite, but I simply don't know enough about the article topic to proceed. Dpenn89 (talk) 07:01, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on BRDM-1. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:22, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on BRDM-1. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:50, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Number used by SSSR[edit]

I don't understand how in the list of operators it is said, that SSSR operated 10 000 units of BRDM-1. I belive that 10 000 units were produced total, can author possibly correct this number or explain it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Just The Chuck (talk • contribs) 17:58, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:BRDM-1&oldid=1206422227"