Talk:Battle of Chamkaur

India: History Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was last assessed in May 2012.

Military history: Asian / South Asia

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	South Asian military history task force

Pritzker Military Library Low‑importance

	This article is related to the Pritzker Military Museum & Library WikiProject. Please copy assessments of the article from the most major WikiProject template to this one as needed.Pritzker Military LibraryWikipedia:GLAM/PritzkerTemplate:WikiProject Pritzker-GLAMPritzker Military Library-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Archives

Index

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

Semi-protected edit request on 4 January 2023[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Sikhs won battle of chamkaur. Because Guru Gobind singh ji wrote Jafarnamah after war to Aurangzeb. Zafar mean victory in persian and nama mean letter. Its means letter of victory. So please correct it. Only one war has been fought in Chamkaur sahib SHERSIDHU (talk) 03:39, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sikhs won battle of chamkaur SHERSIDHU (talk) 03:41, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: as you have not cited reliable sources to back up your request, without which no information should be added to, or changed in, any article. - Arjayay (talk) 11:00, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 25 August 2023[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

122.182.154.51 (talk) 12:40, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Guru Gobind Singh Ji won the battle. Wazir khan all the army people died in this battle which that's why Guru Gobind Singh Ji won.

Not done Guru Gobind Singh Ji ran away - the rest of the Sikhs were killed - Arjayay (talk) 13:06, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Some fact about chamkur[edit]

Few points reg Battle of Chamkaur:

(1) Merely 700 mughals soldiers not millions obviously.

(2) It was a mud house and not a qila (fort).

(3) No battle took place only siege.

(4) Siege lasted just a few hours because in the same night Guru Govind Singh escaped from the house.

.According to contemporary Mughal sources there were 700 Mughal soldiers at Siege of Chamkaur. And, it was a siege, never came to a field battle. After one day siege of the house in which Sikhs were besieged, Guru Govind Singh had to escape in night with a couple of followers.

Correct your knowledge false people false religion false history. 2404:3100:180B:E7D5:1:0:1E0C:1968 (talk) 10:10, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

1,000,000[edit]

In the info-box it says Guru Gobind Singh metaphorically puts the opponents force at 1,000,000, but all the sources cited for it are just a translation of the text and make no mention of anything being metaphorical or literal or anything else. Does anyone have any more sources on this otherwise I will just remove it from the info-box. CanadianSingh1469 (talk) 15:30, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 20 January 2024[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please replace killed word with Martyr Also there was no victory of mughals as their target were Guru Gobind Singh ji And on The above please also mention the number of army Gurkirats533 (talk) 16:55, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: as you have not requested a specific change in the form "Please replace XXX with YYY" or "Please add ZZZ between PPP and QQQ".
More importantly, you have not cited reliable sources to back up your request, without which no information should be added to, or changed in, any article. - Arjayay (talk) 17:06, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]