Talk:Battle of Fort Davidson

Battle of Fort Davidson has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: November 24, 2020. (Reviewed version).

Military history: North America / United States / American Civil War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	American Civil War task force

Missouri Mid‑importance

	Missouri portal This article is part of WikiProject Missouri, a WikiProject related to the U.S. state of Missouri. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MissouriWikipedia:WikiProject MissouriTemplate:WikiProject MissouriMissouri articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Other talk page banners

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Battle of Glasgow, Missouri was copied or moved into Battle of Fort Davidson with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Fort Davidson was copied or moved into Battle of Fort Davidson with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Who won?[edit]

When I went to edit this article, I noticed that the infobox listed this as a Union victory. While the Union garrison certainly won the actual engagement itself (the fighting), they were forced to abandon the fort that night, leaving it to the Confederates. Thus this really should be listed as a Confederate victory, not a Union one (at least in my opinion), even though Price lost in every other way--especially strategically--as a result of this engagment. Thoughts, anyone? - Ecjmartin (talk) 15:46, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Union Victory[edit]

This battle has been listed as a Union victory by the American Battlefield Protection Program and the National Park Service.

Good enough for me!-Ecjmartin (talk) 03:41, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Despite the listing by the American Battlefield Protection Program, I still must argue the fact that Pilot Knob is still listed as a union victory. As Ejc mentioned, the field was left in the control of the Conderate Army of Missouri, which is normally accepted as an admission of defeat. Look at the number of other victories given to the Union or Confederates despite losses or strategical impact, given because one army or the other retained control of the battlefield when all was said and done. I live in this very area, and had family that fought in the 5th Missouri CSA Cavalry, and I would like to see more discussion on this matter, as we've never considered Pilot Knob a defeat in our family annals of war.

174.125.22.213 (talk) 23:47, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Battle of Pilot Knob at Fort Davidson was clearly a Union victory, as the outcome is what kept General Price from continuing on to St Louis. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dhammack70 (talk • contribs) 08:49, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bravo6ep (talk) 12:02, 27 May 2018 (UTC)== External links modified ==[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Battle of Fort Davidson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050909214229/http://www.cr.nps.gov:80/hps/abpp/battles/mo021.htm to http://www.cr.nps.gov/hps/abpp/battles/mo021.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:10, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I was surprised to note that the book Pilot Knob, the Thermopylae of the West. by Peterson, Cyrus Asbury, was not included as a reference. This book contains critical details about the battle as well as the running skirmishes that ensued as the Confederates followed the retreating Union forces that are not identified here. I have not edited before and set up an account to bring forward this information so that those who are experienced may move forward. A link on this book is: https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/000775950. Thanks,