Talk:Battle of Trevilian Station

Military history: North America / United States / American Civil War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	American Civil War task force

Virginia Mid‑importance

	Virginia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Virginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirginiaWikipedia:WikiProject VirginiaTemplate:WikiProject VirginiaVirginia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Opposing forces: Confederate[edit]

Rosser's brigade was not Hampton's former command. Hampton's former Brigade consisted of the 1st and 2nd South Carolina, Cobb's Georgia Legion, Phillips Georgia Legion and the Jeff Davis Legion. What source says that Rosser's brigade was Hampton's former command?

--Kitt1987 (talk) 15:02, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are correct and the citations do not support the statement. Thank you for pointing out the error. Hal Jespersen (talk) 18:04, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Battle of Trevilian Station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:49, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

“Winners and losers”[edit]

The idea that Wikipedia can announce a winner and a loser to an isolated battle is misguided. This maneuver was merely a part of a larger strategy by Grant which succeeded in quickly defeating the Confederacy. Fielding99 (talk) 03:12, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]