Talk:Beehive Forum

Computing: Software / Free and open-source software Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.
	This article is supported by Free and open-source software (assessed as Low-importance).

Marked as biased[edit]

I have marked this article as biased, as it does not appear to have a neutral point of view. This article has insufficient sources to support the claim "Beehive is one of the most secure Open Source forums." due to the fact that the reference merely has a list of known and fixed vulnerability reports, and that it is at least 2 years old. Mraldo (talk) 05:22, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Found a Citation[edit]

According to the article, a citation is needed for "Beehive is used by the popular UK technology website The Inquirer." I looked around and the forum in question is apparently Hermit's Cave. Looking for site:www.theinquirer.net "hermit's cave" on Google gives lots of hits but from year ago. This article on The Inquirer website starts with "HERMIT'S CAVE, which you can nearly always find here, is the discussion forum where consumers of The INQ digest." It seems that it is not used by The Inquirer itself, but that consumers of their website use(d) it. --82.171.70.54 (talk) 21:40, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Citations added[edit]

I have added citations for Hermits Cave and The Inquirer, but I'm unclear as to why the phrase "The current release version of Beehive Forum does not have any known security vulnerabilities" would need a citation? If a statement were released by the Beehive Forum development team it would probably be flagged as biased. I don't see how this can otherwise be resolved other than to remove it. HeyRatFans (talk) 15:15, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Beehive Forum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090307050501/http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?forum_id=759274 to http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?forum_id=759274

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:55, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]