This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
The section, as it had stood, cribbed a summary from Colin Temple’s blog, attributed it to Leibniz, and then explained it very poorly. I have replaced this by a quotation of the actual section of the Monadology that Colin referenced, and more detailed explanations. Thiagovscoelho (talk) 04:00, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
All of the content of that section was either irrelevant to the "best of all possible worlds" theory, or already stated in my updated first section. It may have been interesting stuff to the Leibniz student, but it did not belong here. Thiagovscoelho (talk) 05:41, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
