Talk:Bredon Hill

	Worcestershire portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Worcestershire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Worcestershire-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WorcestershireWikipedia:WikiProject WorcestershireTemplate:WikiProject WorcestershireWorcestershire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Fortifications / British / European / Roman & Byzantine

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Fortifications task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	Roman and Byzantine military history task force

Fred Archer (writer)[edit]

In the process of creating a disambig page for all the Fred Archers out there, I created a proper article- albeit a stub- for the one associated with Bredon Hill. (Someone had inadvertantly linked to an article about the jockey Fred Archer, but that's all sorted now). Someone interested in the subject matter may wish to expand it... but be good boys and girls and remember to include your references. (^_^) Fourohfour 16:12, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bredon Hill. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:39, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Roman and prehistoric remains?[edit]

The text states; There are also Roman earthworks and a number of ancient standing stones on the hill. Are there any references for either of these statements? I'm unaware of either Roman remains or (prehistoric) standing stones in the area but if they are present, it would be good to add referenced detail. Geopersona (talk) 09:35, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]