Talk:Cambridge Energy Research Associates

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Business

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Energy

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Rigor[edit]

Let's bump this article up out of stub class. First, we need to support the claims made by WP about CERA. There are many predictions made, and many of them did not pan out.

Second, we need to maintain a good encyclopedic writing style, so "sell his soul" type comments need to be couched in terms that can be verified by other sources. Skyemoor 14:08, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sources[edit]

I'll start the ball rolling. Here's one source (and more pages at the same site); http://www.energybulletin.net/18111.html --Skyemoor 14:30, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

best wikipedia table ever![edit]

hahaha love it. maybe wrong should be capitalized though.