Talk:Nigorobuna

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Carassius auratus grandoculis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:31, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Taxonomy Section[edit]

I am confused by the taxonomy section of this article: it says that Nigorobuna is commonly regarded as Carassius Auratus Grandoculis. It then says that FishBase recognizes this as a separate species, and cites this link http://www.fishbase.se/summary/Carassius-cuvieri.html which is talking about Carassius cuvieri or the Japanese white crucian carp, a widely acknowledged species distinct from the common goldfish (Carassius Auratus). e.g. WoRMS recognizes Carassius cuvieri http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1021969. Why is a source about C. cuvieri used to suggest that fishbase recognizes C. Grandoculis as a separate species? Or is it intended to say that C. Grandoculis is really a variety of C. Cuiveri? Sorry for my confusion, its just I can't find any mention of "Grandoculis" or "Nigorobuna" or "Funas" at that link at all. --HighFlyingFish (talk) 08:50, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@HighFlyingFish: Yes this was a clerical error, I probably lifted the syntax from the C. cuvieri page and forgot to modify this to {{FishBase|Carassius|Auratus}} to make it link correctly to the auratus page.[1].
The point I was trying to make was that FishBase failed to mention "grandoculis" or "nigoro-buna", and thus apparently did not endorse it as a subspecies. Therefore, you were actually expected NOT to find ""Grandoculis" or "Nigorobuna" or "Funas" at that link at all"
I should probably add that although there is no mention given in FishBase's current auratus page, something about "nigoro-buna" or "grandoculis" must have been mentioned in a species or subspecies page in the past (the 2009 version viewed 2010-12-03, to be more precise. Page not specified however [2]). It seems this possibility is something that has eluded you. --Kiyoweap (talk) 12:26, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]