Talk:Cemetery Junction (film)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the British cinema task force.

Berkshire

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Berkshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Berkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BerkshireWikipedia:WikiProject BerkshireTemplate:WikiProject BerkshireBerkshire articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Doolan[edit]

Wow! They reincarnated Jack Doolan! I'd double check those links... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.80.178.162 (talk) 10:15, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Removed copyrighted content[edit]

I removed the Sony official synopsis - I do not believe that this can be justified under the non-free criterion of "no free equivalent"; a paraphrase would do the same encyclopedic job. If you believe insertion is justified, please discuss on the talk page first. --MegaSloth (talk) 11:39, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reviews largely favourable?[edit]

I just checked rotten tommatoes which is a big critics site if some of you dont know and they say the reviews are average to pretty good, it got 64% I think which is hardly largely favourable. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.182.46.127 (talk) 01:26, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Total Film reliably quoted?[edit]

Reception section - Is this a reliable quote? For one thing they appear to have written "debut" - they didn't get to see The Invention of Lying then?

If this was out-of-context then perhaps that should be explained? Chaosdruid (talk) 09:37, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cemetery Junction (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100429182916/http://ok.co.uk/movies/view/20650/Review-Cemetery-Junction to http://ok.co.uk/movies/view/20650/Review-Cemetery-Junction/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:34, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]