Talk:Circaseptan

Physiology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysiologyWikipedia:WikiProject PhysiologyTemplate:WikiProject PhysiologyPhysiology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article has not yet been associated with a particular area.

Biology Low‑importance

	Biology portal Circaseptan is part of the WikiProject Biology, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to biology on Wikipedia. Leave messages on the WikiProject talk page.BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject BiologyTemplate:WikiProject BiologyBiology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Evidence[edit]

Wow: so it looks like the choice of the seven-day week was actually a pretty good idea in hindsight! Double sharp (talk) 08:42, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This seems like a Wikitionary entry more than an encyclopedia article. Its only citations are also a dictionary and an encyclopedia with a focus on time definitions. The text claims that 7 days is important in biology but cites no relevant source to back up that claim. There is a list of uncited sources but they are primary. —Paleo Neonate – 15:59, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]