Talk:Clarendon Shopping Centre/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: TenPoundHammer (talk · contribs) 22:12, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

I'm interested in shopping malls but have seldom had the time to explore content on ones in other countries. This article was a fascinating look into how they differ in the UK. I think you've hit on all the major points and given a clear encyclopedic picture on the mall and its notability.

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Again, good work. I made a couple tweaks, such as a removal of the word "recent" and the addition of the owner and developer to the infobox. There was very little to modify here, hence the short review. Good work.