Talk:Climate of Delhi

This article was nominated for deletion on 28 September 2021. The result of the discussion was keep.

India: Delhi Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Delhi (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article was last assessed in March 2012.

Weather: Climate Low‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Climate task force (assessed as Low-importance).

WP:INDIA Banner/Delhi Addition[edit]

Note: {{WP India}} Project Banner with Delhi workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under Category:Delhi or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag ^TALK2ME 03:50, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Need to put a superscript message[edit]

I need to put a superscript message "expert content on phenomenon needed" or other like message (the same way as we have the "citation needed" message) at the place where there currently is a template error showing in Red (just in case someone has already reverted that template-error edit, here's where the message is to be put: Winter section, on top-right of the word 'phenomenon' in the line ending with 'Anti-Siberian cyclone-like phenomenon'). Mods. kindly help!--therash09 (talk) 17:23, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Could not find such a superscript. There is a Template:Expert-subject, but that is not a superscript. For now, added verification needed superscript.--Dwaipayan (talk) 19:01, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Thanks for responding! Actually, rather than verification, it is elaboration that I wish to seek. The content is right though not explained. I put up this content but am not aware of the details of the phenomenon. So I thought of putting up a message asking learned users to elaborate on the phenomenon. Therefore, if you could rephrase it, I'd be grateful! With the current message, it urges readers to 'verify' the line, as in check if it is right or wrong, whereas what I'm seeking is elaboration; quite far apart, aren't they? :) --therash09 (talk) 20:12, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps message like "which phenomenon?" or those seeking some description of the phenomenon. --therash09 (talk) 20:16, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm, I think what you are really looking for is Template:Clarify. You are hoping to explain how does that Siberian High cause dry winter or prevent snow, right?--Dwaipayan (talk) 01:55, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

For the template part, EXACTLY!!! I think this should suit that line the most.

As for the "hoping to explain" part, well not exactly... :-/ I know what effect the Siberian High has during winters on surrounding regions, but I actually doubt if has any considerable impact (or in fact any impact whatsoever) on North India, especially knowing that the mighty mountains of the Himaalay prevent winds to and from Siberia and other parts of Central and Northern Asia. However, since winters here in the Northern Plains are quite dry, and the possibility of snowfall here even at sub-zero temperatures is as good as nought, there must surely be some Siberian Anticyclone-like phenomenon playing a strong role, especially because the all-important Western Disturbance which plays the most significant role in North Indian winters is known to bring snowfall in the Himlayan states and rainfall in the Plains.

This actually means that the Western Disturbance tends to bring moisture and could cover to the Northern Plains which implies that winters here should be wet! But in reality the Plains get very little precipitation in winters, that too as rain and not snow even during sub-zero temperatures, as low as -5 or -6 degrees C (except in Plains lying at the Himalayan foothills, which do rarely witness snowfall, e.g. Pathankot), and the winters are rather dry! This obviously points towards an anti-cyclonic formation somewhere that sucks moisture away from the Plains! Is it in the Bay of Bengal? Where is it and what is it? It cannot be the Siberian High, I'm quite sure. That phenomenon makes the Chinese and Mongolian winters dry, but certainly not Indian!! This is what I wish to know... the phenomenon and slight explanation regarding that, and that's what the line is there for!

So yeah, I guess Template:Clarify will be the most suitable superscript! Thanks a lot! --therash09 (talk) 18:18, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Climate of Delhi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:42, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]