Talk:Code Co-op

Notability[edit]

Wondering how this meets WP:SOFTWARE? Ghits reveal a bunch of download links but no independent writeups that I can find, only sources cited in the article are from the developer. Maybe a merge to version control and/or peer-to-peer might be more appropriate? Seraphimblade 20:43, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting stuff, thanks for the links. Seraphimblade 22:14, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I added a few links to reviews, but I'm not sure what you expect from an article about a commercial product. Do you have the same objections to BitKeeper or Source Safe? What makes them notable? The size of the company, or the size of their marketing department?

Code Co-op is a very innovative product. It was the first distributed version control system--before BeetKeeper. It's the first system to use emai. It's the first system to implement peer-to-peer wiki and wiki database. And Reliable Software is a company that not only makes Code Co-op, but also publishes free C++ book, tutorials, souce code, a Windows API library, a Windows API wiki encyclopedia, and so on.

--Bartosz 22:18, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The main objection I had was that the links were all from primary sources. Given the evident amount of secondary material now cited, it would seem this does meet notability. You'll also notice I withdrew the primary sources and notability templates as the concerns were addressed. Seraphimblade 22:20, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Code Co-op. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:40, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]