This is not my usual hang-out, but I just wanted to note, as I have addressed on the talk page, that the infobox does not conform to project standards for formatting of reviews. I have pointed out the difference at the article talk page. --Moonriddengirl(talk) 16:16, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
There should be a Reception section.
Can a Production section be added/expanded in the article?
Break up General and Specific references in the " References" section with subheadings using ;General formatting.
"See also" section goes before "References" per WP:LAYOUT.
Use en dashes for date ranges, like in the infobox, per WP:DASH.
Because there has been no discussion from the article's editors here and some of the issues remain unresolved, and in addition, 7 days have passed, this article has failed. GaryKing (talk) 21:57, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
