Talk:Comstock-Cheney Hall

Connecticut Low‑importance

	Connecticut portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Connecticut, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Connecticut on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConnecticutWikipedia:WikiProject ConnecticutTemplate:WikiProject ConnecticutConnecticut articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

development[edit]

This article could use more attention, perhaps including use of sources that might be found online. Please help! :) Try Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL and Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL Try, for National Park Service material: Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL Or develop from the sources already included in the article! Thanks. --Doncram (talk) 13:32, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Renaming objection[edit]

(discussion moved from WP:TEAHOUSE)

Anachronist I strongly disagree with your renaming an article that has existed as Ivoryton Playhouse since 2007, and is far better known as a well-known theater than as a historic building. I recommend you revert your name change and restore content about the theater, albeit without the laudatory phrases. David notMD (talk) 20:24, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@David notMD: @Blue Water: The sources are all about the building. The theatre is mentioned as an alternate name in the sources. The content I removed seemed to have been copied and pasted from one of the sources. I am not inclined to put it back, but I would like clarification on how the place is commonly known. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:30, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comstock-Cheney Hall is the first listed name in the register of historic places, also. -- asilvering (talk) 23:50, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I also revised the article because it followed the exact recommended format of various "get your business on Wikipedia" youtube videos, which basically say "write about the building" to make the article notable, and that provides the opportunity for the occupant of the building to promote themselves. That is exactly what was done here. Sorry, no. The fact that it's been like this since 2007 is irrelevant. There are millions of Wikipedia articles and the comparatively tiny fraction of active editors cannot monitor them all. ~Anachronist (talk) 02:18, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]