Talk:Damnatus

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Warhammer 40,000, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Warhammer 40,000Wikipedia:WikiProject Warhammer 40,000Template:WikiProject Warhammer 40,000Warhammer 40,000 articles

Board and table games Low‑importance

	Games portal This article is part of WikiProject Board and table games, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to board games and tabletop games. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Board and table gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Board and table gamesTemplate:WikiProject Board and table gamesboard and table game articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

Funny thing is, copyright even in Germany doesn't work like that. He'd only own his additions to the franchise. They had already published their material in germany, protecting their interests. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.95.176.241 (talk) 06:43, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I edited the article slightly:

Copyright law everywhere in the world (where it exists) gives copyright to the creator of the work by default. The german specialty is that the copyright is unalienable and cannot be traded to anyone else through a contract. Otherwise GW would have made the creators sign a contract giving themselves the copyright.

GW only claims that they would lose copyright on the whole WH40k IP. Even the BBC article already linked in the article quotes a law professor who states that the legal situation is unclear.

From personal experience (I studied copyright law at a german university), the claim by GW is completely without substance, otherwise no derivative work would be possible at all in germany, and that is definitely not the case. The creator of the movie gains copyrights on the movie, not on anything that is used as a base for the movie. If that were the case, everyone that creates an advertisement would get a copyright on the product in the clip, which is of course completely ridiculous. I won't put anything on that in the article since it would be original research, and I can't find any court decisions on a similar case either, so for now I just have to let this claim stand. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 170.252.248.203 (talk) 14:07, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]