Talk:Debate regarding child pornography laws

Purpose of this page[edit]

The purpose of this page is to be a reposity for all suggested changes to child pornography laws. At the moment the page is lacking in views advocating strengthening such laws with longer prison sentences and the creation of internet firewalls such those proposed in Australia and already implemented in China. It would be great if someone could add that information. —Rehoboam (talk) 01:41, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I thought Wikipedia represents a NEUTRAL point of view. What you are saying is, this page is just a stage for promotion of very specific political views, in particular, YOURS. This is unacceptable. Nomad (talk) 17:37, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

More information[edit]

The article should be edited to give information about the life-destroying effects of paedophilia. For example, the victims of paedophilia are six times more likely to commit suicide and are eight times more likely to repeatedly attempt suicide throughout their lives. The victims of abuse in childhood are three times more likely to suffer from depression or to commit suicide with the victims of paedophila being the most affected with a 40% higher number of them suffering from depression than the victims of all the other types of abuse. This is important information and will give the reader a much greater understanding of the issue, including the damaging effects mentioned above.Link to Proof of Life-Destroying Effects of Child Pornography

Thank You--86.44.252.83 (talk) 22:31, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Would you please stop spamming this request to all articles loosely related to child abuse? — Arthur Rubin (talk) 22:50, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Debate regarding child pornography laws. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:29, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]