Talk:1992 Democratic Party presidential primaries

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

United States: Presidential elections Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. presidential elections (assessed as Low-importance).

Politics: American Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled

The map is flat-out wrong; Tsongas, not Clinton, won Wasgington and Utah. Who made up this map??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.9.78.241 (talk) 22:48, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong to imply Tasongas won Washington when it was in fact Clinton who won Washington.[1]Speakfor23 (talk) 00:27, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The convention section is entirely about Casey, which makes little sense since this is an article about the primaries and Casey didn't participate in any of them. And the link to the assertion that DNC officials 'allegedly sent a camera crew with Taylor to seek out Casey and "humiliate him" on live television' goes to a less-than-neutral source. Even if it's true, why have 3 paragraphs on a sideshow about a non-candidate who didn't talk at the convention, and zero about the actual nominee or what the platform was? The whole section should be cut, or re-written to actually address the nomination.

I'm also 99% certain that the original "Seven Dwarfs" comment is related to the 1988 campaign, where Hunter S. Thompson made the crack 'Gary Hart and the Seven Dwarfs' to describe the field, but I don't have the patience to look it up.

69.109.106.134 02:32, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I completely agree: the bit on the convention sucks, perhaps the worst wiki entry I have ever seen, looks like it was added by some right wing hack. Who were the main speakers?? What were the main themes? Etc.. He was a minority plank for a reason: the summary should focus on the main thrust of the convention. Piece of crap. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.111.251.229 (talk) 18:52, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You are right that this was in reference to 1988. I don't know that Hunter S. Thompson deserves credit for the term, but the origin was 1988. I've removed it from this article. Still A Student 01:01, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge?

For I think having it all in one place is a good thing Gang14 23:45, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Al Gore?

My dad thinks that Al Gore ran. I cannot find any non-Wikipedia information on this subject. Even when he saw all of the pages related to the subject, he still did not believe me. He does not completely trust Wikipedia. Could someone leave a message on my talk page with an external link to evidence that he did/did not run and then delete this section?Bigblawbenjr (talk) 05:27, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Here, from the New York Times (search for "did not run"): [2]. --Allen (talk) 03:02, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

He didn't. He was considering it, but his son was hit by a car (not sure if the driver was drunk or not) While leaving a baseball game. Gore was too swept up in this, that he decided to spend more time with his family rather than run for President. (Gore mentions it in "An Inconvenient Truth" --Bigvinu (talk) 14:15, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

map vs. text?

The map says Clinton won Utah, the text says Tsongas. Who was it? Was there some weird complication? --Allen (talk) 02:59, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The map is wrong on several accounts. Tsongas did, in fact, win Utah 34.7% to Brown's 29.2%; Clinton received only 18.8%. Additionally, Alaska was won by Uncommitted narrowly over Brown, and Washington's caucus was won narrowly by Uncommitted over Tsongas, though Clinton did win the primary. Maine was also won by Jerry Brown, though only after several days of counting was it determined that he beat out Tsongas. Nevada was won by Jerry Brown with 35.6% to Clinton's 26.3%, thanks to Washoe and Clark counties. North Dakota's primary was won by Perot, though Clinton took the caucus. One last note is that Harkin actually won both the Idaho and Minnesota caucuses, while Clinton won both of their primaries. Rarohla (talk) 20:01, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notable Endorsements

I believe this list is incomplete, but cannot find a greater list. Any knowledgeable person care to impart his/r information? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.168.62.197 (talk) 03:31, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Page format: HORRIBLE

Please somebody reformat this page. Somebody should not be required to have a browser window stretched wider than 1200 pixels in order for all the images not to collide and overlap. For shame: Wikipedia is supposed to be accessible. 76.200.153.78 (talk) 01:36, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I stopgapped this by clearing the gallery under the infobox. DO NOT REVERT THIS unless you want people with a browser window width of less than 1200px to be screwed out of seeing half the images. If you can come up with a better way to fix (re-format) it, please do. I think the gallery is a bad choice here. If there were a way to allow each candidate to run inline so that none of them are forced to overlap the infobox, that would be better. Another better way would be to have each candidate on a row of his/her own, so that the row width can scale naturally. The gallery forces a specific number of images per row - you can never pick the optimal number that will work for all window widths, not if you're going to have a gigantic infobox on the other side. I DON'T WANT TO HEAR ANY CRAP LIKE "GET A BIGGER SCREEN N00b". That is not the point. The point is accessibility. 76.200.153.78 (talk) 03:49, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:RobertPatrickCasey.jpg

The image Image:RobertPatrickCasey.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --22:06, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tennessee

The map indicates Clinton won Tennessee but the table of results doesn't include the Volunteer State's March 10 result.--Danthemankhan 03:36, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Two maps needed?

I saw that another user has recently noted the difference between the non-binding primaries and the caucuses for Idaho and Minnesota. I would suggest we take a page from the 2020 primaries article and have two maps. One for popular vote and one for delegate allocation, which is what actually mattered given that the delegates select the nominee. Any thoughts? Michelangelo1992 (talk) 09:27, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Bill clinton 1987.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:37, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Jerry-Brown-1992-Cropped.png

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:23, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please fix the election map, which inaccurately suggests Paul Tsongas won Oregon

Oregon was in fact won by Clinton.[3][4]Speakfor23 (talk) 00:25, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]