Talk:Doc Gynéco

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Will add photos, and more if the article is not deleted.--DragonFly31 01:17, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see any reason why it would be, so go ahead (as long as the photos aren't copyrighted). - ulayiti (talk) 05:52, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Will add non-copyrighted photos, or photos copyrighted but with consent, and links ASAP.--DragonFly31 08:00, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't like the tone and content of the 'politics' section that keeps being added by some mysterious person keen on imposing a favourable viewpoint on Sarkozy. I've consequently made a few changes; it is even worth wondering if this politics section really is necessary--DragonFly31

Politics[edit]

The article states "The support Doc gives to Sarkozy is the more surprising since his lifestyle seems to be in direct contradiction with the politician's ideas." What in particular about this person's lifestyle is in direct contradiction with Sarkozy's ideals? If this artist's support is surprising then this is important information.

Thank you, Rjan

The artist's support can be considered in direct contradiction to the politician's ideas because of his drugs lifestyle, alledged 'sell out' in his terrible last album (musically - sales were awful, and he was dropped from his label), and his general history of malevolant behaviour. Furthermore, he comes from poor parisian suburbs, where Sarkozy is a figure reviled, due partly to some of his comments, both about immigrants and the suburbs in question.

This exaplains why Doc was booed off the stage in Geneva.--DragonFly31 13:15, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • If, and this is a big if, the artist has come out and made a political endorsement it is certainly noteworthy. But, I think we need to find sources for this or cull it. Rotovia (talk) 23:13, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On Women[edit]

  • Because a comment like "demeaning ... women" is potentially defamatory, it needs to either be proven or removed. I will tag it for a citation, and if no-one can find one, I'll remove the the line. Rotovia (talk) 23:17, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Doc Gynéco. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:45, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Doc Gynéco. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:09, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Doc_Gynéco&oldid=1198329821"