Talk:Dollhouse

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 24 February 2020 and 31 March 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Villageofplenty.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:40, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

3/4" scale?[edit]

Someone should recheck the math on the statements made about the three-quarter inch scale. If 3/4" = 1 scale foot, then 1 inch should equal 16 scale inches, making it 1:16 scale, not 1:18. One or more of the given statements are incorrect. — Joe Webster 12:26, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

By this reckoning, 1:18 scale should be the same as two-thirds inch scale. — Joe Webster 02:10, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, I really wonder about the fact that this problem seems to occur almost everywhere. I stumbled upon it because 1,5" or 1/8th scale is very popular among miniature railways builders. As a consequence half the size, or 3/4" would mean 1/16th - an officially defined scale by MOROP. 1/18th is a very common scale for model cars. I don't want to judge an "ideal" scale. I'm just interested in how this story of 3/4 equals 1/18th became so popular. --Peter Walt A. 23:56, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

1:18 is also the scale for the smaller Hasbro GI [Li'l] Joes, M & C Toys' Power Team figures and, I think, 21st Century's Ultimate Soldier figures and accessories. — Joe Webster 03:20, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Self promotion[edit]

Wikipedia is not a platform for advertising your home website, your miniature shop or to gain attention to your goods and services. Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, please do not add promotional material to articles. Advertising, and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox", is strongly discouraged. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Wikipedia is encyclopedic in nature and should be used for information not as a selling tool Mystar 01:38, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation[edit]

Given that "Dollhouse" refers to several different things, and people searching for it are more likely to be looking for the TV Series rather than the miniature replica, I believe that "Dollhouse" should lead directly to the disambiguation page. --Poh Tay Toez (talk) 23:54, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree EuroSong talk 12:35, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Since the hatnote is already here, it wouldn't make a difference, users would still have to click one more time on the disambiguation page to reach Dollhouse (TV series). Also, compare with Firefly and Firefly (disambiguation). Siawase (talk) 16:27, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notable dollhouses[edit]

Material keeps being re-added that is problematic and goes against the core policies of Wikipedia. All material must be verifiable by reliable sources. This generally means magazines and newspapers, not blogs or websites of unknown origin (and no mirrors of Wikipedia itself.) You cannot espouse your own theories or conclusion either, that goes against Wikipedia's policy against original research. Also material has to be presented in a neutral manner, you cannot make it seem like some dollhouses are uniquely special compared to others when there are no sources to support that assertion. And don't use puffery and empty fluff words to make some dollhouses seem more special either, no "palatial" "museum quality" and so on, just give the readers the facts. And keep in mind that this article is an overview article that only needs summaries of the most basic, barebones details of each notable dollhouse. If you want to go more in depth, do so on the individual articles for each dollhouse. If any of this seems unclear, I highly recommend reading through the Core content policies. If you have any questions, I'd be happy to reply here or on my talk page. Siawase (talk) 14:26, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dollhouse. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:41, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Dollhouse. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:19, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]